Applied Explainability for Large Language Models: A Comparative Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15371v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:07:29 GMT
• Title: Applied Explainability for Large Language Models: A Comparative Study
• Abstract summary: This paper presents an applied comparative study of three explainability techniques: Integrated Gradients, Attention Rollout, and SHAP.<n>The results show that gradient-based attribution provides more stable and intuitive explanations.<n>Work highlights key trade-offs between explainability methods and emphasizes their role as diagnostic tools rather than definitive explanations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across many natural language processing tasks, yet their decision processes remain difficult to interpret. This lack of transparency creates challenges for trust, debugging, and deployment in real-world systems. This paper presents an applied comparative study of three explainability techniques: Integrated Gradients, Attention Rollout, and SHAP, on a fine-tuned DistilBERT model for SST-2 sentiment classification. Rather than proposing new methods, the focus is on evaluating the practical behavior of existing approaches under a consistent and reproducible setup. The results show that gradient-based attribution provides more stable and intuitive explanations, while attention-based methods are computationally efficient but less aligned with prediction-relevant features. Model-agnostic approaches offer flexibility but introduce higher computational cost and variability. This work highlights key trade-offs between explainability methods and emphasizes their role as diagnostic tools rather than definitive explanations. The findings provide practical insights for researchers and engineers working with transformer-based NLP systems. This is a preprint and has not undergone peer review.

Related papers

• Applications of the Transformer Architecture in AI-Assisted English Reading Comprehension [7.644563519492337]
  This paper studies interpretable and fair artificial intelligence architectures for understanding English reading.<n>The model's lack of interpretability, reduction of algorithmic bias, and unreliable performance in learning environments are the current issues faced in natural language teaching.<n>The proposed method aims to ensure high prediction accuracy and fairness for different learners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T09:11:38Z)
• Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models:A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures [37.785583281358875]
  In intrinsic interpretability, which builds transparency directly into model architectures and computations, has emerged as a promising alternative.<n>This paper presents a systematic review of the recent advances in intrinsic interpretability for Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:15:46Z)
• Reasoning Palette: Modulating Reasoning via Latent Contextualization for Controllable Exploration for (V)LMs [49.66344956133349]
  Reasoning capacity shapes both inference-time performance and reinforcement learning (RL) training for large (vision-) language models.<n>This paper proposes Reasoning Palette, a novel latent-modulation framework that endows the model with a latent variable for strategic contextualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T03:32:53Z)
• Evaluating Generalization and Representation Stability in Small LMs via Prompting, Fine-Tuning and Out-of-Distribution Prompts [2.377892000761193]
  We investigate the generalization capabilities of small language models under two popular adaptation paradigms: few-shot prompting and supervised fine-tuning.<n>Our findings highlight critical differences in how small models internalize and generalize knowledge under different adaptation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T01:44:26Z)
• How to Probe: Simple Yet Effective Techniques for Improving Post-hoc Explanations [69.72654127617058]
  Post-hoc importance attribution methods are a popular tool for "explaining" Deep Neural Networks (DNNs)<n>In this work we bring forward empirical evidence that challenges this very notion.<n>We discover a strong dependency on and demonstrate that the training details of a pre-trained model's classification layer play a crucial role.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T22:25:11Z)
• Explaining the Unexplained: Revealing Hidden Correlations for Better Interpretability [1.8274323268621635]
  Real Explainer (RealExp) is an interpretability method that decouples the Shapley Value into individual feature importance and feature correlation importance.<n>RealExp enhances interpretability by precisely quantifying both individual feature contributions and their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T10:50:50Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlation [65.83104529677234]
  We study the learning process of a two-layer nonlinear convolutional neural network in the presence of spurious features. Our analysis suggests that imbalanced data groups and easily learnable spurious features can lead to the dominance of spurious features during the learning process. We propose a new training algorithm called PDE that efficiently enhances the model's robustness for a better worst-group performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T05:44:06Z)
• Explaining Language Models' Predictions with High-Impact Concepts [11.47612457613113]
  We propose a complete framework for extending concept-based interpretability methods to NLP. We optimize for features whose existence causes the output predictions to change substantially. Our method achieves superior results on predictive impact, usability, and faithfulness compared to the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T14:48:27Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.