Brain Score Tracks Shared Properties of Languages: Evidence from Many Natural Languages and Structured Sequences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15503v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:25:10 GMT
• Title: Brain Score Tracks Shared Properties of Languages: Evidence from Many Natural Languages and Structured Sequences
• Abstract summary: We use a framework called Brain Score (BS) to argue for a high degree of similarity.<n>We conduct experiments by training LMs on various types of input data and evaluate them on BS.<n>We find that models trained on various natural languages from many different language families have very similar BS performance.
• Score: 3.802965738657408
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in language models (LMs) using neural networks have raised the question: how similar are these models' processing to human language processing? Results using a framework called Brain Score (BS) -- predicting fMRI activations during reading from LM activations -- have been used to argue for a high degree of similarity. To understand this similarity, we conduct experiments by training LMs on various types of input data and evaluate them on BS. We find that models trained on various natural languages from many different language families have very similar BS performance. LMs trained on other structured data -- the human genome, Python, and pure hierarchical structure (nested parentheses) -- also perform reasonably well and close to natural languages in some cases. These findings suggest that BS can highlight language models' ability to extract common structure across natural languages, but that the metric may not be sensitive enough to allow us to infer human-like processing from a high BS score alone.

Related papers

• Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Models [52.92279412466086]
  We show that $m$local entropy are difficult for Transformer and LSTM LMs to learn languages.<n>These results suggest that neurals are highly sensitive to the statistical structure of a language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T15:21:05Z)
• Can Language Models Learn Typologically Implausible Languages? [62.823015163987996]
  Grammatical features across human languages show intriguing correlations often attributed to learning biases in humans.<n>We discuss how language models (LMs) allow us to better determine the role of domain-general learning biases in language universals.<n>We test LMs on an array of highly naturalistic but counterfactual versions of the English (head-initial) and Japanese (head-final) languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T20:40:01Z)
• Searching for Structure: Investigating Emergent Communication with Large Language Models [0.10923877073891446]
  We simulate a classical referential game in which Large Language Models learn and use artificial languages.<n>Our results show that initially unstructured holistic languages are indeed shaped to have some structural properties that allow two LLM agents to communicate successfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T16:32:19Z)
• Training Neural Networks as Recognizers of Formal Languages [87.06906286950438]
  We train and evaluate neural networks directly as binary classifiers of strings.<n>We provide results on a variety of languages across the Chomsky hierarchy for three neural architectures.<n>Our contributions will facilitate theoretically sound empirical testing of language recognition claims in future work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T16:33:25Z)
• What Languages are Easy to Language-Model? A Perspective from Learning Probabilistic Regular Languages [78.1866280652834]
  Large language models (LM) are distributions over strings.<n>We investigate the learnability of regular LMs (RLMs) by RNN and Transformer LMs.<n>We find that the complexity of the RLM rank is strong and significant predictors of learnability for both RNNs and Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:34:24Z)
• Is neural language acquisition similar to natural? A chronological probing study [0.0515648410037406]
  We present the chronological probing study of transformer English models such as MultiBERT and T5. We compare the information about the language learned by the models in the process of training on corpora. The results show that 1) linguistic information is acquired in the early stages of training 2) both language models demonstrate capabilities to capture various features from various levels of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T17:24:11Z)
• Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Models [84.86942006830772]
  We conjecture that multilingual pre-trained models can derive language-universal abstractions about grammar. We conduct the first large-scale empirical study over 43 languages and 14 morphosyntactic categories with a state-of-the-art neuron-level probe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T12:22:31Z)
• Linguistic Typology Features from Text: Inferring the Sparse Features of World Atlas of Language Structures [73.06435180872293]
  We construct a recurrent neural network predictor based on byte embeddings and convolutional layers. We show that some features from various linguistic types can be predicted reliably.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T21:00:53Z)
• Learning Music Helps You Read: Using Transfer to Study Linguistic Structure in Language Models [27.91397366776451]
  Training LSTMs on latent structure (MIDI music or Java code) improves test performance on natural language. Experiments on transfer between natural languages controlling for vocabulary overlap show that zero-shot performance on a test language is highly correlated with typological similarity to the training language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T06:24:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.