AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16004v1
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:27:36 GMT
- Title: AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier
- Abstract summary: Verifiers have been demonstrated to enhance LLM reasoning via test-time scaling (TTS)<n>We propose Agentic Verifier, a framework that transforms reward modeling into a multi-turn, tool-augmented deliberative process.<n>We show that Agentic Verifier yields consistent performance gains under both parallel and sequential TTS.
- Score: 63.55502685076245
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Verifiers have been demonstrated to enhance LLM reasoning via test-time scaling (TTS). Yet, they face significant challenges in complex domains. Error propagation from incorrect intermediate reasoning can lead to false positives for seemingly plausible solutions, while lacking external grounding makes verifiers unreliable on computation or knowledge-intensive tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Agentic Verifier, a framework that transforms reward modeling into a multi-turn, tool-augmented deliberative process. We introduce complementary forward and backward agents: one traces solutions from premises to conclusions, while the other re-checks conclusions against their underlying premises. This bidirectional process enables a comprehensive, reliable, and interpretable assessment of solutions. To facilitate practical deployment, we propose AgentV-RL. Through proactive exploration and reinforcement learning, the verifier autonomously interleaves tool-use with internal reasoning. Extensive experiments show that Agentic Verifier yields consistent performance gains under both parallel and sequential TTS. Notably, our 4B variant surpasses state-of-the-art ORMs by 25.2%, positioning it as a promising paradigm for agentic reward modeling.
Related papers
- DiffuseAgent-MI: Distributionally-Grounded,Tool-Integrated Self-Evolving Agents for Faithful Visual Reasoning [24.745715007832953]
DiffuseAgent-MI improves accuracy by up to 5.1 points over prior self-evolving agents.<n>On GeoQA, SciVis, VQA-v2 and an in-house multimodal reasoning set, DiffuseAgent-MI improves accuracy by up to 5.1 points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-01T08:54:44Z) - RetroAgent: From Solving to Evolving via Retrospective Dual Intrinsic Feedback [54.39884046754265]
RetroAgent is an online RL framework that enables agents to master complex interactive environments.<n>Our experiments show that RetroAgent achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T16:23:33Z) - Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration [49.9937230730202]
We propose Search-R2, a novel Actor-Refiner collaboration framework that enhances reasoning through targeted intervention.<n>Our approach decomposes the generation process into an Actor, which produces initial reasoning trajectories.<n>We show that Search-R2 consistently outperforms strong RAG and RL-based baselines across model scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T15:32:09Z) - Veri-Sure: A Contract-Aware Multi-Agent Framework with Temporal Tracing and Formal Verification for Correct RTL Code Generation [4.723302382132762]
silicon-grade correctness remains bottlenecked by: (i) limited test coverage and reliability of simulation-centric evaluation, (ii) regressions and repair hallucinations, and (iii) semantic drift as intent is reinterpreted across agent handoffs.<n>We propose Veri-Sure, a multi-agent framework that establishes a design contract to align agents' intent and uses a patching mechanism guided by static dependency slicing to perform precise, localized repairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-27T16:10:23Z) - Adversarial Yet Cooperative: Multi-Perspective Reasoning in Retrieved-Augmented Language Models [72.4149653187766]
We propose a Reasoner-Verifier framework named Adrialversa Reasoning RAG (ARR)<n>The Reasoner and Verifier engage in reasoning on retrieved evidence and critiquing each other's logic while being guided by process-aware advantage.<n> Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T06:57:03Z) - Multimodal Reinforcement Learning with Agentic Verifier for AI Agents [131.46008226323423]
Argos is a principled multimodal reward agent to train reasoning models for agentic tasks.<n>By leveraging our agentic verifier across both SFT data and RL training, our model achieves state-of-the-art results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-03T04:42:47Z) - Towards Self-Evolving Benchmarks: Synthesizing Agent Trajectories via Test-Time Exploration under Validate-by-Reproduce Paradigm [60.36837655498119]
We propose a Trajectory-based validated-by-Reproducing Agent-benchmark Complexity Evolution framework.<n>This framework takes an original task from an existing benchmark and encourages agents to evolve it into a new task with higher difficulty.<n>Experiments on the GAIA benchmark demonstrate that the TRACE framework consistently enhances task complexity while improving the reliability of correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T01:52:52Z) - SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agents [32.76299758137446]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have recently shown impressive capabilities in complex reasoning and tool use via multi-step interactions with their environments.<n>These trajectories contain rich feedback that can navigate agents toward the right directions for solving problems correctly.<n>Although prevailing approaches, such as Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), can effectively balance exploration and exploitation, they ignore the interdependence among various trajectories.<n>We propose SE-Agent, a Self-Evolution framework that enables Agents to optimize their reasoning processes iteratively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T05:51:55Z) - Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.