Governing the Agentic Enterprise: A Governance Maturity Model for Managing AI Agent Sprawl in Business Operations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16338v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:35:14 GMT
• Title: Governing the Agentic Enterprise: A Governance Maturity Model for Managing AI Agent Sprawl in Business Operations
• Abstract summary: Organizations face uncontrolled agent sprawl: the proliferation of redundant, ungoverned, and conflicting AI agents.<n>Despite growing acknowledgment of this challenge, academic literature lacks a formal, empirically validated governance maturity model.<n>This paper introduces the Agentic AI Governance Maturity Model (AAGMM), a five-level framework spanning 12 governance domains.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid adoption of agentic AI in enterprise business operations--autonomous systems capable of planning, reasoning, and executing multi-step workflows--has created an urgent governance crisis. Organizations face uncontrolled agent sprawl: the proliferation of redundant, ungoverned, and conflicting AI agents across business functions. Industry surveys report that only 21% of enterprises have mature governance models for autonomous agents, while 40% of agentic AI projects are projected to fail by 2027 due to inadequate governance and risk controls. Despite growing acknowledgment of this challenge, academic literature lacks a formal, empirically validated governance maturity model connecting governance capability to measurable business outcomes. This paper introduces the Agentic AI Governance Maturity Model (AAGMM), a five-level framework spanning 12 governance domains, grounded in NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 standards. We additionally propose a novel taxonomy of agent sprawl patterns--functional duplication, shadow agents, orphaned agents, permission creep, and unmonitored delegation chains--each linked to quantifiable business cost models. The framework is validated through 750 simulation runs across five enterprise scenarios and five governance maturity levels, measuring business outcomes including cost containment, risk incident rates, operational efficiency, and decision quality. Results demonstrate statistically significant differences (p < 0.001, large effect sizes d > 2.0) between all governance maturity levels, with Level 4-5 organizations achieving 94.3% lower sprawl indices, 96.4% fewer risk incidents, and 32.6% higher effective task completion rates compared to Level 1. The AAGMM provides practitioners with an actionable roadmap for governing autonomous AI agents while maximizing business returns.

Related papers

• The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI [0.0]
  We argue that agentic AI governance is four problems, not one, each with a mature governing science.<n>We formalize each layer, derive cross-layer coupling conditions, and trace twenty-plus enterprise controls to their classical constructs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T19:10:31Z)
• From Single Chatbots to Governed Agent Ecosystems: An Agentic AI Pattern Catalogue and Orchestration Framework for Mission-Critical Hospital Information Management Systems [0.18899300124593646]
  This research proposes a compliance-first Agentic AI pattern catalogue and orchestration framework.<n>The framework extends by adding (i) a taxonomy of Agentic roles, (ii) a formal risk-stratification model that maps each pattern to risk tiers, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and governance hooks, and (iii) a unified orchestration capable of coordinating multi-agent orchestration across EHR/HIMS landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T10:57:30Z)
• Plan First, Judge Later, Run Better: A DMAIC-Inspired Agentic System for Industrial Anomaly Detection [51.90293101535452]
  We propose DMAIC-IAD (DMAIC-inspired Agentic Industrial Anomaly Detection), a "Plan First, Judge Later" multi-agent system.<n>We show DMAIC-IAD improves average detection performance over applicable agentic baselines by 37.76%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T08:38:14Z)
• OccuBench: Evaluating AI Agents on Real-World Professional Tasks via Language Environment Simulation [57.505743202759646]
  OccuBench is a benchmark covering 100 real-world professional task scenarios across 10 industry categories and 65 specialized domains.<n>Our multi-agent synthesis pipeline automatically produces evaluation instances with guaranteed solvability, calibrated difficulty, and document-grounded diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T00:27:32Z)
• AI TIPS 2.0: A Comprehensive Framework for Operationalizing AI Governance [0.0]
  Organizations struggle with inadequate risk assessment at the use case level.<n>Existing frameworks like ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF remain at high conceptual levels.<n>No systematic approach to embed AI practices throughout the development lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T20:57:22Z)
• Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
  We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z)
• Towards Outcome-Oriented, Task-Agnostic Evaluation of AI Agents [1.0305173936249623]
  This white paper proposes a novel framework of eleven outcome-based, task-agnostic performance metrics for AI agents.<n>We introduce metrics such as Goal Completion Rate (GCR), Autonomy Index (AIx), Multi-Step Task Resilience (MTR), and Business Impact Efficiency (BIE)<n>Our results reveal significant performance trade-offs between different agent designs, highlighting the Hybrid Agent as the most consistently high-performing model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T13:40:46Z)
• LIMI: Less is More for Agency [49.63355240818081]
  LIMI (Less Is More for Intelligent Agency) demonstrates that agency follows radically different development principles.<n>We show that sophisticated agentic intelligence can emerge from minimal but strategically curated demonstrations of autonomous behavior.<n>Our findings establish the Agency Efficiency Principle: machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T10:59:32Z)
• OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
  We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z)
• Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition [101.86739402748995]
  We run the largest public red-teaming competition to date, targeting 22 frontier AI agents across 44 realistic deployment scenarios.<n>We build the Agent Red Teaming benchmark and evaluate it across 19 state-of-the-art models.<n>Our findings highlight critical and persistent vulnerabilities in today's AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T05:13:04Z)
• Agentic Business Process Management: Practitioner Perspectives on Agent Governance in Business Processes [0.7270112855088837]
  With the rise of generative AI, industry interest in software agents is growing.<n>This paper investigates how organizations can effectively govern AI agents.<n>It outlines six key recommendations for the responsible adoption of AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T20:15:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.