NL2SQLBench: A Modular Benchmarking Framework for LLM-Enabled NL2SQL Solutions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16493v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 18:00:05 GMT
• Title: NL2SQLBench: A Modular Benchmarking Framework for LLM-Enabled NL2SQL Solutions
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have greatly improved NL2 algorithms, but their rapid development outpaces systematic evaluation.<n>We present NL2Bench, the first modular evaluation and benchmarking framework for unified-enabled NL2 approaches.<n>Our evaluation reveals significant gaps in existing NL2 methods, highlighting not only substantial room for accuracy improvements but also the significant computational inefficiency.
• Score: 16.53346245559808
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Natural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) technology empowers non-expert users to query relational databases without requiring SQL expertise. While large language models (LLMs) have greatly improved NL2SQL algorithms, their rapid development outpaces systematic evaluation, leaving a critical gap in understanding their effectiveness, efficiency, and limitations. To this end, we present NL2SQLBench, the first modular evaluation and benchmarking framework for LLM-enabled NL2SQL approaches. Specifically, we dissect NL2SQL systems into three core modules: Schema Selection, Candidate Generation, and Query Revision. For each module, we comprehensively review existing strategies and propose novel fine-grained metrics that systematically quantify module-level effectiveness and efficiency. We further implement these metrics in a flexible multi-agent framework, allowing configurable benchmarking across diverse NL2SQL approaches. Leveraging NL2SQLBench, we rigorously evaluate ten representative open-source methods on two datasets, the BIRD development set and the ScienceBenchmark development set, using two LLMs, DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-4o mini. We systematically assess each approach across the three core modules and evaluate multiple critical performance dimensions. Our evaluation reveals significant gaps in existing NL2SQL methods, highlighting not only substantial room for accuracy improvements but also the significant computational inefficiency, which severely hampers real-world adoption. Furthermore, our analysis identifies critical shortcomings in current benchmark datasets and evaluation rules, emphasizing issues such as inaccurate gold SQL annotations and limitations in existing evaluation rules. By synthesizing these insights into a unified benchmarking, our study establishes a clear reference point for fair comparison and serves as essential guidance for future targeted innovation in NL2SQL technology.

Related papers

• Reflect-SQL: A Self-Reflection Based Framework for Text-to-SQL [3.052889399420755]
  Democratizing data access through natural language is a crucial goal for modern enterprises.<n>The practical adoption of Text-to-effective is critically hindered by real-world complexities.<n>We introduce Reflect-, a novel framework for Text tosql, grounded in multi-stage self-reflection approach.<n>Our framework achieves an execution accuracy of 72.03%, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T07:46:27Z)
• SQuaD-SQL: Efficient Text-to-SQL with Small Language Models via LLM-Guided Knowledge Distillation [10.706234312157278]
  Small language models (SLMs) can approach the performance of large language models (LLMs) on the Text-to-Small task while significantly improving efficiency through knowledge distillation and synthetic data generation.<n>Experiments on the Wiki dataset demonstrate that SQuaD-Small achieves an execution accuracy of 86.9% on the test set while offering faster inference and lower memory usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-09T06:56:20Z)
• OpenCompass: A Universal Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models [62.59671563145442]
  General-purpose large language models (LLMs) have become a critical link in advancing technological development.<n>Mainstream benchmark datasets face challenges such as the diversity of task types, inconsistent evaluation criteria, and fragmentation of data and processing.<n>This paper proposes and open-source Open LLMs, a one-stop, scalable, and high-concurrency general-purpose evaluation platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T02:50:11Z)
• AgentNLQ: A General-Purpose Agent for Natural Language to SQL [2.224371215696068]
  This study presents a new multi-agent method for NL2 that achieves 78.1% semantic accuracy on the BIg Bench for LaRge-scale Database benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T18:33:15Z)
• Structured Prompting Enables More Robust Evaluation of Language Models [38.53918044830268]
  We present a DSPy+HELM framework that introduces structured prompting methods which elicit reasoning.<n>We find that without structured prompting, HELM underestimates LM performance (by 4% average) and performance estimates vary more across benchmarks.<n>This is the first benchmarking study to systematically integrate structured prompting into an established evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T20:37:59Z)
• Rethinking Agentic Workflows: Evaluating Inference-Based Test-Time Scaling Strategies in Text2SQL Tasks [21.891522433628893]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly powering Text-to- (Text2) systems, enabling non-expert users to query industrial databases using natural language.<n>While test-time scaling strategies have shown promise in LLM-based solutions, their effectiveness in real-world applications, especially with the latest reasoning models, remains uncertain.<n>This work sheds light on the practical trade-offs between accuracy, efficiency, and complexity when deploying Text2 systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T01:29:54Z)
• HES-SQL: Hybrid Reasoning for Efficient Text-to-SQL with Structural Skeleton Guidance [6.653834890554154]
  We present HES-, a novel hybrid training framework that advances Text-to-latency generation through the integration of thinking-mode-fused supervised fine-tuning.<n>This framework enables switch between reasoning and non-reasoning modes while improving query accuracy and execution efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T01:15:57Z)
• LLM-Driven Data Generation and a Novel Soft Metric for Evaluating Text-to-SQL in Aviation MRO [0.6374763930914525]
  We introduce a novel F1-score-based'soft' metric that quantifies the informational overlap between generated and ground-truth results.<n>We demonstrate our contributions through an empirical evaluation on an authentic MRO database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T04:04:13Z)
• Effectiveness of Prompt Optimization in NL2SQL Systems [11.173297717087713]
  We argue that production scenarios demand high-precision, high-performance NL2 systems.<n>In such scenarios, the careful selection of a static set of exemplars-capturing the intricacies of the query log, target database, and execution latencies-plays a more crucial role than exemplar selection based solely on similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T23:54:36Z)
• ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage? [86.79310356779108]
  ACEBench is a comprehensive benchmark for assessing tool usage in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>It categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent.<n>It provides a more granular examination of error causes across different data types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T12:59:08Z)
• Learning from Imperfect Data: Towards Efficient Knowledge Distillation of Autoregressive Language Models for Text-to-SQL [83.99974309930072]
  Knowledge distillation (KD) is a common approach, which aims to distill the larger teacher model into a smaller student model. We propose to improve the KD with Imperfect Data, namely KID, which effectively boosts the performance without introducing much training budget. KID can not only achieve consistent and significant performance gains across all model types and sizes, but also effectively improve the training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T07:51:00Z)
• From Natural Language to SQL: Review of LLM-based Text-to-SQL Systems [1.1060425537315088]
  This survey provides a comprehensive study of the evolution of LLM-based text-to- systems.<n>We discuss benchmarks, evaluation methods, and evaluation metrics.<n>We highlight key challenges such as computational efficiency, model robustness, and data privacy toward improvements of LLM-based text-to- systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T20:46:25Z)
• Relational Database Augmented Large Language Model [59.38841050766026]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. They can only incorporate new knowledge through training or supervised fine-tuning processes. This precise, up-to-date, and private information is typically stored in relational databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T06:19:10Z)
• Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation [76.76046657162306]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for Text-to- task. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for Text-to- task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T14:59:54Z)
• SQL-PaLM: Improved Large Language Model Adaptation for Text-to-SQL (extended) [53.95151604061761]
  This paper introduces the framework for enhancing Text-to- filtering using large language models (LLMs) With few-shot prompting, we explore the effectiveness of consistency decoding with execution-based error analyses. With instruction fine-tuning, we delve deep in understanding the critical paradigms that influence the performance of tuned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T21:39:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.