Expressing Social Emotions: Misalignment Between LLMs and Human Cultural Emotion Norms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16757v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:17:34 GMT
• Title: Expressing Social Emotions: Misalignment Between LLMs and Human Cultural Emotion Norms
• Abstract summary: We present a psychologically informed evaluation framework of cross-cultural social emotion expression in LLMs.<n>Using a human study comparing European American and Latin American participants' expression of engaging and disengaging emotions, we evaluate six frontier LLMs.<n>All models express engaging emotions more than disengaging ones, with particularly stark differences observed for the generally well-represented European American persona.<n>Our ablation analyses reveal that these patterns are robust to sampling temperatures, partially sensitive to prompt language, and dependent on the response elicitation format.
• Score: 4.123547796999231
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The expression of emotions that serve social purposes, such as asserting independence or fostering interdependence, is central to human interactions and varies systematically across cultures. As LLMs are increasingly used to simulate human behavior in culturally nuanced interactions, it is important to understand whether they faithfully capture human patterns of social emotion expression. When LLM responses are not culturally aligned, their utility is compromised -- particularly when users assume they are interacting with a culturally attuned interlocutor, and may act on advice that proves inappropriate in their cultural context. We present a psychologically informed evaluation framework of cross-cultural social emotion expression in LLMs. Using a human study comparing European American and Latin American participants' expression of engaging and disengaging emotions, we evaluate six frontier LLMs on their ability to reflect culturally differentiated patterns for expressing social emotions. We find systematic misalignment between model and human behavior: all models express engaging emotions more than disengaging ones, with particularly stark differences observed for the generally well-represented European American persona. We further highlight that LLM responses are highly concentrated and deterministic, failing to capture the diversity of human responses in expressing social emotions. Our ablation analyses reveal that these patterns are robust to sampling temperatures, partially sensitive to prompt language, and dependent on the response elicitation format. Together, our findings highlight limitations in how current LLMs represent the interaction of cultural and emotional axes, particularly when expressing social emotions, with direct implications for their deployment in cross-cultural affective contexts.

Related papers

• Dual Perspectives in Emotion Attribution: A Generator-Interpreter Framework for Cross-Cultural Analysis of Emotion in LLMs [23.408766732887912]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in cross-cultural systems to understand and adapt to human emotions.<n>We propose a Generator-Interpreter framework that captures dual perspectives of emotion attribution by considering both expression and interpretation.<n>Our analysis reveals that performance variations depend on the emotion type and cultural context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T23:32:17Z)
• EMO-R3: Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [62.3977734456669]
  We propose Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning (EMO-R3), a framework designed to enhance the emotional reasoning ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We introduce Structured Emotional Thinking to guide the model to perform step-by-step emotional reasoning in a structured and interpretable manner, and design a Reflective Emotional Reward that enables the model to re-evaluate its reasoning based on visual-text consistency and emotional coherence.<n>EMO-R3 significantly improves both the interpretability and emotional intelligence of MLLMs, achieving superior performance across multiple visual emotional understanding benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:42:52Z)
• A Unified Spoken Language Model with Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking for Human-like Interaction [50.05919688888947]
  This paper presents a unified spoken language model for emotional intelligence, enhanced by a novel data construction strategy termed Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking (IEAT)<n>IEAT incorporates user emotional states and their underlying causes into the model's internal reasoning process, enabling emotion-aware reasoning to be internalized rather than treated as explicit supervision.<n> Experiments on the Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems Challenge (HumDial) Emotional Intelligence benchmark demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves top-ranked performance across emotional trajectory modeling, emotional reasoning, and empathetic response generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T14:07:30Z)
• Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion [61.358959720048354]
  We introduce a systematic framework for analyzing large language models' behavior in social simulation.<n>Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T06:08:41Z)
• Fluent but Unfeeling: The Emotional Blind Spots of Language Models [1.248728117157669]
  A critical gap remains in evaluating whether Large Language Models (LLMs) align with human emotions at a fine-grained level.<n>We introduce Express, a benchmark dataset curated from Reddit communities featuring 251 fine-grained, self-disclosed emotion labels.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation framework examines predicted emotion terms and decomposes them into eight basic emotions using established emotion theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T16:31:13Z)
• From Anger to Joy: How Nationality Personas Shape Emotion Attribution in Large Language Models [4.362338454684645]
  We investigate how different countries are represented in pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) through emotion attributions.<n>Our analysis reveals significant nationality-based differences, with emotions such as shame, fear, and joy being disproportionately assigned across regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T04:35:51Z)
• SocialEval: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Large Language Models [70.90981021629021]
  Social Intelligence (SI) equips humans with interpersonal abilities to behave wisely in navigating social interactions to achieve social goals.<n>This presents an operational evaluation paradigm: outcome-oriented goal achievement evaluation and process-oriented interpersonal ability evaluation.<n>We propose SocialEval, a script-based bilingual SI benchmark, integrating outcome- and process-oriented evaluation by manually crafting narrative scripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T08:36:51Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• Disentangle Identity, Cooperate Emotion: Correlation-Aware Emotional Talking Portrait Generation [63.94836524433559]
  DICE-Talk is a framework for disentangling identity with emotion and cooperating emotions with similar characteristics.<n>We develop a disentangled emotion embedder that jointly models audio-visual emotional cues through cross-modal attention.<n>Second, we introduce a correlation-enhanced emotion conditioning module with learnable Emotion Banks.<n>Third, we design an emotion discrimination objective that enforces affective consistency during the diffusion process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T05:28:21Z)
• CULEMO: Cultural Lenses on Emotion -- Benchmarking LLMs for Cross-Cultural Emotion Understanding [7.308914305652415]
  We introduce Cultural Lenses on Emotion (CuLEmo), the first benchmark designed to evaluate culture-aware emotion prediction across six languages.<n>CuLEmo comprises 400 crafted questions per language, each requiring nuanced cultural reasoning and understanding.<n>We use this benchmark to evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs on culture-aware emotion prediction and sentiment analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T01:01:30Z)
• Analyzing Cultural Representations of Emotions in LLMs through Mixed Emotion Survey [2.9213203896291766]
  This study focuses on analyzing the cultural representations of emotions in Large Language Models (LLMs) Our methodology is based on the studies of Miyamoto et al. (2010), which identified distinctive emotional indicators in Japanese and American human responses. We find that models have limited alignment with the evidence in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-04T20:56:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.