x1: Learning to Think Adaptively Across Languages and Cultures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16917v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:50:51 GMT
• Title: x1: Learning to Think Adaptively Across Languages and Cultures
• Abstract summary: We introduce x1, a family of reasoning models that can adaptively reason in an advantageous language on a per-instance basis.<n>Our experiments demonstrate the benefits of adaptive multilingual reasoning across multilingual mathematical reasoning and culturally grounded tasks.<n>Our findings establish language choice as a functional component of reasoning, with implications for building more generalist and globally competent reasoning models.
• Score: 44.61124344089541
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Languages encode distinct abstractions and inductive priors, yet most large language models (LLMs) overlook this diversity by reasoning in a single dominant language. In this work, we introduce x1, a family of reasoning models that can adaptively reason in an advantageous language on a per-instance basis. To isolate the effect of reasoning-language choice, x1 is constructed without expanding the model's knowledge boundaries and is trained by contrasting linguistically distinct reasoning trajectories for the same input. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the benefits of adaptive multilingual reasoning across multilingual mathematical reasoning and culturally grounded tasks. Moreover, our results challenge a simplistic view of scaling laws: while scaling reduces cross-lingual disparities in procedural domains such as math reasoning, it does not eliminate the advantages of culture-associated languages in culturally grounded tasks, as we empirically show that such reasoning enables more efficient and accurate cultural knowledge recall. Overall, our findings establish language choice as a functional component of reasoning, with implications for building more generalist and globally competent reasoning models.

Related papers

• Building Multilingual Bridges: Data Mixing as the Pillar of Generalization for In-Language Reasoning [75.46846056993418]
  Reasoning language models primarily reason in English regardless of the language they are prompted in.<n>This is inaccessible for non-English-speaking users, risks losing the intent of the original question, and forgoes knowledge more readily expressed in the target language.<n>In this work, we advance L2 reasoning, the ability of a model to reason consistently in the language of the user's prompt, thus building an in-language bridge between the prompt and the answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T16:56:25Z)
• LANG: Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Reasoning with Language-Adaptive Hint Guidance [77.58408743830314]
  Reinforcement learning has proven effective for enhancing multi-step reasoning in large language models.<n>But its benefits have not fully translated to multilingual contexts.<n>We develop a novel framework that leverages language-conditioned hints to guide exploration in non-English reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T14:47:52Z)
• What Makes Good Multilingual Reasoning? Disentangling Reasoning Traces with Measurable Features [32.31269959716733]
  This work asks what actually characterizes effective reasoning in multilingual settings.<n>We first define a suite of measurable reasoning features spanning multilingual alignment, reasoning step, and reasoning flow aspects of reasoning traces.<n>We then train sparse autoencoders over multilingual traces to automatically discover latent reasoning concepts that instantiate or extend these features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T14:40:50Z)
• Align to the Pivot: Dual Alignment with Self-Feedback for Multilingual Math Reasoning [71.4175109189942]
  We present Pivot-Aligned Self-Feedback Multilingual Reasoning (PASMR)<n>This approach designates the model's primary language as the pivot language.<n>It establishes a cross-lingual self-feedback mechanism without relying on external correct answers or reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T03:20:00Z)
• Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models? [59.970391602080205]
  Despite multilingual training, LRMs tend to default to reasoning in high-resource languages at test time.<n>Cultural reasoning degrades performance on reasoning tasks but benefits cultural tasks, while safety evaluations exhibit language-specific behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T02:46:18Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• Language Specific Knowledge: Do Models Know Better in X than in English? [9.923619418000488]
  Code-switching is a common phenomenon of alternating between different languages in the same utterance, thought, or conversation.<n>We coin the term Language Specific Knowledge (LSK) to represent this phenomenon.<n>We find that language models can perform better when using chain-of-thought reasoning in some languages other than English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T00:31:13Z)
• On the Thinking-Language Modeling Gap in Large Language Models [68.83670974539108]
  We show that there is a significant gap between the modeling of languages and thoughts.<n>We propose a new prompt technique termed Language-of-Thoughts (LoT) to demonstrate and alleviate this gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T09:31:52Z)
• Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scaling [51.55526326294275]
  We find that scaling up inference compute for English-centric reasoning language models (RLMs) improves multilingual mathematical reasoning across many languages.<n>While English-centric RLM's CoTs are naturally predominantly English, they consistently follow a quote-and-think pattern to reason about quoted non-English inputs.<n>We observe poor out-of-domain reasoning generalization, in particular from STEM to cultural commonsense knowledge, even for English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T16:50:06Z)
• Large Language Models Are Cross-Lingual Knowledge-Free Reasoners [43.99097308487008]
  We decompose the process of reasoning tasks into two separated components: knowledge retrieval and knowledge-free reasoning.<n>We show that the knowledge-free reasoning capability can be nearly perfectly transferred across various source-target language directions.<n>We hypothesize that knowledge-free reasoning shares similar neurons in different languages for reasoning, while knowledge is stored separately in different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T14:03:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.