Uncertainty Quantification in PINNs for Turbulent Flows: Bayesian Inference and Repulsive Ensembles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17156v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 22:02:54 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Quantification in PINNs for Turbulent Flows: Bayesian Inference and Repulsive Ensembles
• Abstract summary: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising framework for solving inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs)<n>We develop and evaluate a set of probabilistic extensions of PINNs for uncertainty quantification in turbulence modeling.<n>The proposed framework combines (i) Bayesian PINNs with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling and a tempered multi-component likelihood, (ii) Monte Carlo dropout, and (iii) repulsive deep ensembles that enforce diversity in function space.
• Score: 3.758814046658822
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising framework for solving inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), including the reconstruction of turbulent flow fields from sparse data. However, most existing PINN formulations are deterministic and do not provide reliable quantification of epistemic uncertainty, which is critical for ill-posed problems such as data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling. In this work, we develop and systematically evaluate a set of probabilistic extensions of PINNs for uncertainty quantification in turbulence modeling. The proposed framework combines (i) Bayesian PINNs with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling and a tempered multi-component likelihood, (ii) Monte Carlo dropout, and (iii) repulsive deep ensembles that enforce diversity in function space. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of ensemble diversity and likelihood tempering in improving uncertainty calibration for PDE-constrained inverse problems. The methods are assessed on a hierarchy of test cases, including the Van der Pol oscillator and turbulent flow past a circular cylinder at Reynolds numbers Re=3,900 (direct numerical simulation data) and Re = 10,000 (experimental particle image velocimetry data). The results demonstrate that Bayesian PINNs provide the most consistent uncertainty estimates across all inferred quantities, while function-space repulsive ensembles offer a computationally efficient approximation with competitive accuracy for primary flow variables. These findings provide quantitative insight into the trade-offs between accuracy, computational cost, and uncertainty calibration in physics-informed learning, and offer practical guidance for uncertainty quantification in data-driven turbulence modeling.

Related papers

• Distributionally Faithful Imputation via Positive Semi-Definite Kernel Density Estimation [55.47411235954028]
  We recast imputation under missing completely at random as density estimation from masked observations.<n>We obtain a convex empirical risk problem with closed form marginals, solvable by a Newton interior point method.<n>The resulting PSD Impute model yields both single and multiple imputations from the same fitted density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T15:51:05Z)
• Structure-Aware Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operator PDE Surrogates [10.39662017167378]
  Uncertainty quantification (UQ) must be both computationally efficient and spatially faithful.<n>We propose a structure-aware UQ scheme that exploits the modular anatomy common to modern NOs.<n> Experiments on challenging PDE benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed structure-aware design yields more reliable coverage, tighter bands, and improved residual-uncertainty alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T10:17:24Z)
• Equivariant Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials [55.6997213490859]
  Uncertainty quantification is critical for assessing the reliability of machine learning interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations.<n>Existing UQ approaches for MLIPs are often limited by high computational cost or suboptimal performance.<n>We propose textitEquivariant Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials ($texte2$IP), a backbone-agnostic framework that models atomic forces and their uncertainty jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T02:00:25Z)
• A Conformal Prediction Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networks [0.9613011825024471]
  PINNs have emerged as a powerful framework for solving PDEs.<n>Existing uncertainty quantification approaches for PINNs generally lack rigorous statistical guarantees.<n>We introduce a distribution-free conformal prediction framework for UQ in PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T06:12:48Z)
• A Simple Approximate Bayesian Inference Neural Surrogate for Stochastic Petri Net Models [0.0]
  We introduce a neural-network-based approximation of the posterior distribution framework.<n>Our model employs a lightweight 1D Convolutional Residual Network trained end-to-end on Gillespie-simulated SPN realizations.<n>On synthetic SPNs with 20% missing events, our surrogate recovers rate-function coefficients with an RMSE = 0.108 and substantially runs faster than traditional Bayesian approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T18:31:19Z)
• Repulsive Ensembles for Bayesian Inference in Physics-informed Neural Networks [10.075911116030621]
  We consider the inverse problem and employ repulsive ensembles of PINNs for obtaining uncertainty estimates.<n>The repulsive ensemble produces significantly more accurate uncertainty estimates and exhibits higher sample diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T21:58:40Z)
• Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification approaches for Neural PDEs in scientific applications [0.0]
  This work evaluates various Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) approaches for both Forward and Inverse Problems in scientific applications. Specifically, we investigate the effectiveness of Bayesian methods, such as Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and Monte-Carlo Dropout (MCD) Our results indicate that Neural PDEs can effectively reconstruct flow systems and predict the associated unknown parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T04:52:20Z)
• Monte Carlo Neural PDE Solver for Learning PDEs via Probabilistic Representation [59.45669299295436]
  We propose a Monte Carlo PDE solver for training unsupervised neural solvers.<n>We use the PDEs' probabilistic representation, which regards macroscopic phenomena as ensembles of random particles.<n>Our experiments on convection-diffusion, Allen-Cahn, and Navier-Stokes equations demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T08:05:19Z)
• Importance sampling for stochastic quantum simulations [68.8204255655161]
  We introduce the qDrift protocol, which builds random product formulas by sampling from the Hamiltonian according to the coefficients. We show that the simulation cost can be reduced while achieving the same accuracy, by considering the individual simulation cost during the sampling stage. Results are confirmed by numerical simulations performed on a lattice nuclear effective field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T15:06:32Z)
• BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion [52.184885680729224]
  We study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. We introduce a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T10:14:18Z)
• Leveraging Global Parameters for Flow-based Neural Posterior Estimation [90.21090932619695]
  Inferring the parameters of a model based on experimental observations is central to the scientific method. A particularly challenging setting is when the model is strongly indeterminate, i.e., when distinct sets of parameters yield identical observations. We present a method for cracking such indeterminacy by exploiting additional information conveyed by an auxiliary set of observations sharing global parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T12:23:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.