The Open-Weight Paradox: Why Restricting Access to AI Models May Undermine the Safety It Seeks to Protect

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17413v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:38:14 GMT
• Title: The Open-Weight Paradox: Why Restricting Access to AI Models May Undermine the Safety It Seeks to Protect
• Abstract summary: The governance of open-weight artificial intelligence (AI) models has been framed as a binary choice: openness as risk, restriction as safety.<n>This paper argues that access restrictions, without governed alternatives, may displace risks rather than reduce them.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The governance of open-weight artificial intelligence (AI) models has been framed as a binary choice: openness as risk, restriction as safety. This paper challenges that framing, arguing that access restrictions, without governed alternatives, may displace risks rather than reduce them. The global concentration of compute infrastructure makes open-weight models one of the most viable pathways to sovereign AI capacity in the Global South; restricting such access deepens asymmetries while driving proliferation into unsupervised settings. This analysis proposes that hardware-layer governance, including chip-level attestation mechanisms such as FlexHEG, trusted execution environments, confidential computing, and complementary software-layer safeguards, offers a defense-in-depth alternative to the current binary. A threat model taxonomy mapping misuse vectors to hardware, software, institutional, and liability layers illustrates why no single governance mechanism suffices. To operationalize this approach, the paper argues that effective AI governance as a dual-use technology will likely require a multilateral institutional architecture functionally analogous, though not identical, to the role performed by the IAEA in the nuclear domain, with explicit safeguards against the co-option of hardware controls for domestic repression. The relevant policy question is how to make openness safer through technical and institutional design while addressing the transition realities of legacy hardware, attestation at scale, and civil liberties protection.

Related papers

• Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems [0.7919969809015938]
  The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligent (AI) powered autonomous agents has fundamentally changed the existing forms of software governance.<n>Current solutions fail to protect unbound state space agentic architecture from serious threats such as alignment, security concerns, and unauthorized deployment of shadow AI systems.<n>A solution is proposed for overcoming the discussed challenges in form of a coherent multi-level AI governance stack Traccia built on the top of OpenTelemetry infrastructure platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T19:14:21Z)
• MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized Expertise [55.297863000560596]
  MESA (MoE Safety Alignment) is a targeted alignment framework for MoE-based Large Language Models.<n>It strategically decentralizes safety responsibility to maximize coverage while minimizing interference with utility.<n>MESA achieves robust defensive performance against varied harmful benchmarks while preserving helpfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T09:54:38Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Regulatory Compliance and Treaty Verification [0.0]
  This paper bridges the gap between AI governance and computer engineering by proposing a taxonomy of 20 hardware-level governance mechanisms.<n>For each mechanism, we provide a technical description, a feasibility rating, and an identification of adversarial vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T14:26:14Z)
• Chain-of-Authorization: Internalizing Authorization into Large Language Models via Reasoning Trajectories [21.063230721511726]
  Chain-of-Authorization (CoA) framework internalizes authorization logic into Large Language Models' core capabilities.<n>CoA integrates policy execution with task responses, making authorization a causal prerequisite for substantive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T07:13:01Z)
• Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw [42.9467373594646]
  This report presents a comprehensive security analysis of the OpenClaw ecosystem.<n>We highlight critical vulnerabilities such as prompt injection-driven Remote Code Execution (RCE), sequential tool attack chains, context amnesia, and supply chain contamination.<n>To address these systemic architectural flaws, we introduce the Full-Lifecycle Agent Security Architecture (FASA)<n>This theoretical defense blueprint advocates for zero-trust agentic execution, dynamic intent verification, and cross-layer reasoning-action correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T04:33:05Z)
• SafeThinker: Reasoning about Risk to Deepen Safety Beyond Shallow Alignment [43.86865924673546]
  We propose SafeThinker, an adaptive framework that allocates defensive resources via a lightweight gateway classifier.<n> Experiments show that SafeThinker significantly lowers attack success rates across diverse jailbreak strategies without compromising robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T07:12:53Z)
• Governable AI: Provable Safety Under Extreme Threat Models [31.36879992618843]
  We propose a Governable AI (GAI) framework that shifts from traditional internal constraints to externally enforced structural compliance.<n>The GAI framework is composed of a simple yet reliable, fully deterministic, powerful, flexible, and general-purpose rule enforcement module (REM); governance rules; and a governable secure super-platform (GSSP) that offers end-to-end protection against compromise or subversion by AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T04:22:59Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Toward a Global Regime for Compute Governance: Building the Pause Button [0.4952055253916912]
  We propose a governance system designed to prevent AI systems from being trained by restricting access to computational resources.<n>We identify three key intervention points -- technical, traceability, and regulatory -- and organize them within a Governance--Enforcement--Verification framework.<n> Technical mechanisms include tamper-proof FLOP caps, model locking, and offline licensing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T15:18:19Z)
• Mitigating Cyber Risk in the Age of Open-Weight LLMs: Policy Gaps and Technical Realities [0.0]
  Open-weight general-purpose AI (GPAI) models offer significant benefits but also introduce substantial cybersecurity risks.<n>This paper analyzes the specific threats -- including accelerated malware development and enhanced social engineering -- magnified by open-weight AI release.<n>We propose a path forward focusing on evaluating and controlling specific high-risk capabilities rather than entire models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:35:52Z)
• Position: Mind the Gap-the Growing Disconnect Between Established Vulnerability Disclosure and AI Security [56.219994752894294]
  We argue that adapting existing processes for AI security reporting is doomed to fail due to fundamental shortcomings for the distinctive characteristics of AI systems.<n>Based on our proposal to address these shortcomings, we discuss an approach to AI security reporting and how the new AI paradigm, AI agents, will further reinforce the need for specialized AI security incident reporting advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.