Augmenting unit test suites from integration tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17508v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 15:58:55 GMT
• Title: Augmenting unit test suites from integration tests
• Abstract summary: We propose a method that employs static and dynamic analysis for augmenting a test suite with automatically generated unit tests.<n>The method is most suitable for test suites where the stratification of unit, integration and system tests does not conform to the recommended test pyramid structure.<n>We showcase and empirically evaluate the proposed method in the Node.js platform, although it can be ported and adapted to other languages and platforms.
• Score: 0.3437656066916039
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We propose a method that employs static and dynamic analysis for augmenting a test suite with automatically generated unit tests. The method is most suitable for test suites where the stratification of unit, integration and system tests does not conform to the recommended test pyramid structure: numerous unit tests providing high code coverage and forming the base, fewer integration tests in the middle that verify component collaboration, and far fewer system or UI tests at the top that exercise acceptance or other scenarios of use. Instead, integration and system tests represent the majority of test cases, resulting in coarse-grained tests with limited fault localization and longer execution times. The method leverages integration tests, exercising a component and its dependencies, to generate unit tests that verify component dependencies in isolation. We showcase and empirically evaluate the proposed method in the Node.js platform, although it can be ported and adapted to other languages and platforms. The evaluation is based on a research prototype implemented as a Node.js tool and is conducted in the context of twelve open source JS applications (benchmark projects). Evaluation results support the effectiveness and practicality of our approach.

Related papers

• Sakura: An Approach for Generating Complex Tests from Natural Language Test Descriptions [46.562528718959506]
  Sakura is a framework for generating tests from natural language (NL) descriptions of developer intent.<n>Sakura decomposes NL descriptions into structured blocks and processes them using a multi-agent system.<n>Sakura significantly outperforms off-the-truth agentic tools such as Gemini CLI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T04:49:10Z)
• LLMs for Automated Unit Test Generation and Assessment in Java: The AgoneTest Framework [2.501198441875755]
  AgoneTest is an evaluation framework for Large Language Model-generated unit tests in Java.<n>For the subset of tests that compile, LLM-generated tests can match or exceed human-written tests in terms of coverage and defect detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T15:33:00Z)
• Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol [83.83217247686402]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved from simple text generators into complex software systems that integrate retrieval augmentation, tool invocation, and multi-turn interactions.<n>Their inherent non-determinism, dynamism, and context dependence pose fundamental challenges for quality assurance.<n>This paper decomposes LLM applications into a three-layer architecture: textbftextitSystem Shell Layer, textbftextitPrompt Orchestration Layer, and textbftextitLLM Inference Core.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T13:00:28Z)
• Alignment with Fill-In-the-Middle for Enhancing Code Generation [56.791415642365415]
  We propose a novel approach that splits code snippets into smaller, granular blocks, creating more diverse DPO pairs from the same test cases.<n>Our approach demonstrates significant improvements in code generation tasks, as validated by experiments on benchmark datasets such as HumanEval (+), MBPP (+), APPS, LiveCodeBench, and BigCodeBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T03:15:53Z)
• TestForge: Feedback-Driven, Agentic Test Suite Generation [7.288137795439405]
  TestForge is an agentic unit testing framework designed to cost-effectively generate high-quality test suites for real-world code.<n>TestForge produces more natural and understandable tests compared to state-of-the-art search-based techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T20:21:44Z)
• LlamaRestTest: Effective REST API Testing with Small Language Models [50.058600784556816]
  We present LlamaRestTest, a novel approach that employs two custom Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate realistic test inputs.<n>We evaluate it against several state-of-the-art REST API testing tools, including RESTGPT, a GPT-powered specification-enhancement tool.<n>Our study shows that small language models can perform as well as, or better than, large language models in REST API testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T05:51:20Z)
• Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch [77.38414688148006]
  Commit0 is a benchmark that challenges AI agents to write libraries from scratch.<n>Agents are provided with a specification document outlining the library's API as well as a suite of interactive unit tests.<n> Commit0 also offers an interactive environment where models receive static analysis and execution feedback on the code they generate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T18:11:30Z)
• A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites [1.4563527353943984]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development. We present AgoneTest: an automated system for generating test suites for Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T23:02:16Z)
• Revisiting and Improving Retrieval-Augmented Deep Assertion Generation [13.373681113601982]
  Unit testing has become an essential activity in software development process. Yu et al. proposed an integrated approach (integration for short) to generate assertions for a unit test. Despite promising, there is still a knowledge gap as to why or where integration works or does not work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T02:39:02Z)
• Improved Compositional Generalization by Generating Demonstrations for Meta-Learning [53.818234285773165]
  We show substantially improved performance on a previously unsolved compositional behaviour split without a loss of performance on other splits. In this case, searching for relevant demonstrations even with an oracle function is not sufficient to attain good performance when using meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T14:58:54Z)
• Automated Support for Unit Test Generation: A Tutorial Book Chapter [21.716667622896193]
  Unit testing is a stage of testing where the smallest segment of code that can be tested in isolation from the rest of the system is tested. Unit tests are typically written as executable code, often in a format provided by a unit testing framework such as pytest for Python. This chapter introduces the concept of search-based unit test generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T11:13:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.