SelfHeal: Empirical Fix Pattern Analysis and Bug Repair in LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17699v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:28:15 GMT
• Title: SelfHeal: Empirical Fix Pattern Analysis and Bug Repair in LLM Agents
• Abstract summary: We study buggy posts and code snippets from Stack Overflow, GitHub, and HuggingFace forums.<n>We introduce AgentDefect, the first benchmark dataset for bugs in LLM agents.<n>We present SelfHeal, a multi-agent system designed to fix bugs in LLM agents.
• Score: 3.8743350688734988
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed software development and AI applications. While LLMs are designed for text processing, LLM agents extend this capability by enabling autonomous actions, tool use, and multi-step task completion. As this field grows, developers face new challenges in debugging these complex systems. To address this challenge, we present the first empirical study on bug fix patterns in LLM agents. We study buggy posts and code snippets from three platforms: Stack Overflow, GitHub, and HuggingFace Forums. We examine their fix patterns, the components where fixes are applied, and the programming languages and frameworks involved. Furthermore, we introduce AgentDefect, the first benchmark dataset for bugs in LLM agents. The dataset contains 37 runtime buggy instances along with fixed code and test files. Finally, we present SelfHeal, a multi-agent system designed to fix bugs in LLM agents. The system leverages two independent ReAct agents: the fix agent and the critic agent. These agents use tools that provide both internal knowledge (fix rules) and external knowledge (web search) to propose and validate fixes. Our evaluation shows that SelfHeal with Gemini 3 Pro as the backbone LLM outperforms both baseline and state-of-the-art approaches by a significant margin.

Related papers

• Understanding Agent-Reactive Bugs at the Model-Harness Boundary: An Empirical Study of LLM Agent Issue Reports [9.560342483305371]
  This study is the first empirical study focused on agent-reactive (AR) bugs.<n>Our findings show that many AR bugs manifest as silent errors without well-defined test oracles.<n>These findings point to the need for mechanisms that help users and developers understand the root causes and resolutions of AR bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T06:53:31Z)
• When Agents Fail: A Comprehensive Study of Bugs in LLM Agents with Automated Labeling [3.0882445204950013]
  We present the first comprehensive study of bug types, root causes, and effects in LLM agent-based software.<n>We collected and analyzed 1,187 bug-related posts and code snippets from Stack Overflow, GitHub, and Hugging Face forums.<n>We built a ReAct agent named BugReAct, equipped with adequate external tools to determine whether it can detect and annotate the bugs in our dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T18:13:10Z)
• DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [48.971606069204825]
  DoVer is an intervention-driven debug framework for large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems.<n>It augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions.<n>DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:23:48Z)
• InspectCoder: Dynamic Analysis-Enabled Self Repair through interactive LLM-Debugger Collaboration [71.18377595277018]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently generate buggy code with complex logic errors that are challenging to diagnose.<n>We present InspectCoder, the first agentic program repair system that empowers LLMs to actively conduct dynamic analysis via interactive debugger control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T06:26:29Z)
• Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures [62.196870049524364]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in solving complex, multi-step tasks.<n>They amplify vulnerability to cascading failures, where a single root-cause error propagates through subsequent decisions.<n>Current systems lack a framework that can comprehensively understand agent error in a modular and systemic way.<n>We introduce the AgentErrorTaxonomy, a modular classification of failure modes spanning memory, reflection, planning, action, and system-level operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:20:27Z)
• Do AI models help produce verified bug fixes? [62.985237003585674]
  Large Language Models are used to produce corrections to software bugs.<n>This paper investigates how programmers use Large Language Models to complement their own skills.<n>The results are a first step towards a proper role for AI and LLMs in providing guaranteed-correct fixes to program bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:16Z)
• Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems [50.29939179830491]
  Failure attribution in LLM multi-agent systems remains underexplored and labor-intensive.<n>We develop and evaluate three automated failure attribution methods, summarizing their corresponding pros and cons.<n>The best method achieves 53.5% accuracy in identifying failure-responsible agents but only 14.2% in pinpointing failure steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T23:09:44Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Advancements and Techniques in Automated Program Repair and Code Generation [0.0]
  27 recent papers have been reviewed and split into two groups. The first group consists of new methods for bug detection and repair, which include locating semantic errors. The second group dwells on code generation, providing an overview of both general-purpose LLMs fine-tuned for programming and task-specific models. It also presents methods to improve code generation, such as identifier-aware training, fine-tuning at the instruction level, and incorporating semantic code structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T06:47:54Z)
• A Unified Debugging Approach via LLM-Based Multi-Agent Synergy [39.11825182386288]
  FixAgent is an end-to-end framework for unified debug through multi-agent synergy. It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art repair methods, fixing 1.25$times$ to 2.56$times$ bugs on the repo-level benchmark, Defects4J.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T04:55:35Z)
• Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Models [56.00992369295851]
  Open-sourced Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved great success in various NLP tasks, however, they are still far inferior to API-based models when acting as agents. This paper delivers three key observations: (1) the current agent training corpus is entangled with both formats following and agent reasoning, which significantly shifts from the distribution of its pre-training data; (2) LLMs exhibit different learning speeds on the capabilities required by agent tasks; and (3) current approaches have side-effects when improving agent abilities by introducing hallucinations. We propose Agent-FLAN to effectively Fine-tune LANguage models for Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T16:26:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.