Mira-Embeddings-V1: Domain-Adapted Semantic Reranking for Recruitment via LLM-Synthesized Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17738v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 02:51:12 GMT
- Title: Mira-Embeddings-V1: Domain-Adapted Semantic Reranking for Recruitment via LLM-Synthesized Data
- Abstract summary: We present mira-embeddings-v1, a semantic reranking system for the recruitment domain.<n>Starting from real JDs, we build a five-stage prompt pipeline to generate diverse positive and hard negative samples.<n>We then apply a two-round LoRA adaptation: JD--JD contrastive training followed by JD--CV triplet alignment on a heterogeneous text dataset.
- Score: 12.621394200451613
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Candidate sourcing for recruiters is best viewed as a two-stage retrieval and reranking pipeline with recall as the primary objective under a limited review budget. An upstream production retriever first returns a candidate shortlist for each job description (JD), and our goal is to rerank that shortlist so that qualified candidates appear as high as possible. We present mira-embeddings-v1, a semantic reranking system for the recruitment domain that reshapes the embedding space with LLM-synthesized training data and corrects boundary confusions with a lightweight reranking head. Starting from real JDs, we build a five-stage prompt pipeline to generate diverse positive and hard negative samples that sculpt the semantic space from multiple angles. We then apply a two-round LoRA adaptation: JD--JD contrastive training followed by JD--CV triplet alignment on a heterogeneous text dataset. Importantly, these gains require no large-scale manually labeled industrial training pairs: a modest set of real JDs is expanded into supervision through LLM synthesis. Finally, a BoundaryHead MLP reranks the Top-K results to distinguish between roles that share the same title but differ in scope. On a local pool of 300 real JDs with candidates from an upstream production retriever, mira-embeddings-v1 improves Recall@50 from 68.89% (baseline) to 77.55% while lifting Precision@10 from 35.77% to 39.62%. On a supportive global pool over 44,138 candidates judged by a Qwen3-32B rubric, it achieves Recall@200 of 0.7047 versus 0.5969 for the baseline. These results show that LLM-synthesized supervision with boundary-aware reranking yields robust gains without a heavy cross-encoder.
Related papers
- Retrieval, Scoring, and Decoding Shape Performance and Stability in LLM-based Conversational Recommendation [0.7874708385247353]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as rerankers in recommender systems.<n>We compare proprietary, open-weight, and fine-tuned LLM rerankers with collaborative-filtering and sequential baselines.<n>For the strongest proprietary rerankers, switching from semantic to collaborative-filtering candidates raises NDCG@10 by more than 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-31T10:54:20Z) - A-SR: Self-Evolving Agentic LLMs for Symbolic Regression via Hierarchical Coordination [51.06539604709775]
We propose A-SR, a self-evolving agentic framework that shifts the control unit from expression edits to role-conditioned evidence views.<n>A-SR coordinates formula discovery through routing among coordination protocols, an online evaluator-reward role policy, and state-routed process memory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T14:01:10Z) - DS@GT-ARC at eRisk 2026 Task 3: Sparse, Semantic, and LLM Reranking for ADHD Symptom Sentences [0.0]
This paper describes our submissions to eRisk 2026 Task 3, ADHD Symptom Sentence Ranking.<n>The task requires systems to rank candidate Reddit sentences according to their relevance to each of the 18 symptoms in the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1).<n>Our systems combine sparse BM25 retrieval, evidence-aware rescoring for self-referential symptom reports, embedding-based reranking, query-prototype expansion, and LLM-based reranking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-04T16:19:22Z) - NOWJ@COLIEE 2026: Adaptive Pipelines for Legal Retrieval and Reasoning [1.2884266282263097]
This paper presents the methodologies and results of the NOWJ team's participation across all five tasks of the COLIEE 2026 competition.<n>For Task 1 (Legal Case Retrieval), we propose a four-stage candidate filtering, dense retrieval with complementary embedding models, cross-encoder reranking via fine-tuned generative rerankers.<n>For Task 2 (Legal Case Entailment), we combine BM25-based reranking, attention-based reranking, and consensus ensemble verification.<n>For Task 3 (Statute Law Retrieval and Entailment), we adopt a retrieval-aug
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-18T02:46:06Z) - ConFit v3: Improving Resume-Job Matching with LLM-based Re-Ranking [25.204351022437923]
We train ConFit v3 with Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-32B on real-world person-job fit datasets.<n>We find significant improvements over existing best person-job fit systems as well as strong LLMs such as GPT-5 and Claude Opus-4.5.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T21:10:41Z) - RefineBench: Evaluating Refinement Capability of Language Models via Checklists [71.02281792867531]
We evaluate two refinement modes: guided refinement and self-refinement.<n>In guided refinement, both proprietary LMs and large open-weight LMs can leverage targeted feedback to refine responses to near-perfect levels within five turns.<n>These findings suggest that frontier LMs require breakthroughs to self-refine their incorrect responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T07:20:52Z) - Rank-GRPO: Training LLM-based Conversational Recommender Systems with Reinforcement Learning [70.6126069527741]
ConvRec-R1 is a two-stage framework for end-to-end training of conversational recommender systems.<n>In Stage 1, we construct a behavioral-cloning dataset with a Remap-Reflect-Adjust pipeline.<n>In Stage 2, we propose Rank-GRPO, a principled extension of group relative policy optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-23T02:56:00Z) - VAULT: Vigilant Adversarial Updates via LLM-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation for NLI [15.320553375828045]
VAULT is a fully automated adversarial RAG pipeline that uncovers and remedies weaknesses in NLI models.<n>VAULT consistently outperforms prior in-context adversarial methods by up to 2.0% across datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T14:22:54Z) - Deep Retrieval at CheckThat! 2025: Identifying Scientific Papers from Implicit Social Media Mentions via Hybrid Retrieval and Re-Ranking [4.275139302875217]
We present the methodology and results of the Deep Retrieval team for subtask 4b of the CLEF CheckThat! 2025 competition.<n>We propose a hybrid retrieval pipeline that combines lexical precision, semantic generalization, and deep contextual re-ranking.<n>Our approach achieves a mean reciprocal rank at 5 (MRR@5) of 76.46% on the development set and 66.43% on the hidden test set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T08:55:39Z) - Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning [76.50690734636477]
We introduce Rank-R1, a novel LLM-based reranker that performs reasoning over both the user query and candidate documents before performing the ranking task.<n>Our experiments on the TREC DL and BRIGHT datasets show that Rank-R1 is highly effective, especially for complex queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T03:14:26Z) - FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding [56.727761901751194]
First, we introduce FIRST, a novel listwise LLM reranking approach leveraging the output logits of the first generated identifier to directly obtain a ranked ordering of the candidates.
Empirical results demonstrate that FIRST accelerates inference by 50% while maintaining a robust ranking performance with gains across the BEIR benchmark.
Our results show that LLM rerankers can provide a stronger distillation signal compared to cross-encoders, yielding substantial improvements in retriever recall after relevance feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T21:27:50Z) - Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting [65.00288634420812]
Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) is a technique to significantly reduce the burden on Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our results are the first in the literature to achieve state-of-the-art ranking performance on standard benchmarks using moderate-sized open-sourced LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-30T11:32:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.