Safe Control using Learned Safety Filters and Adaptive Conformal Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18482v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:34:49 GMT
• Title: Safe Control using Learned Safety Filters and Adaptive Conformal Inference
• Abstract summary: Safety filters have been shown to be effective tools to ensure the safety of control systems with unsafe nominal policies.<n>This paper presents Adaptive Conformal Filtering (ACoFi), a method that combines learned Hamilton-Jacobi reachability-based safety filters with adaptive conformal inference.<n>We show that ACoFi guarantees that the rate of incorrectly quantifying uncertainty in the predicted safety of the nominal policy is upperally bounded by a user-defined parameter.
• Score: 0.8921166277011348
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Safety filters have been shown to be effective tools to ensure the safety of control systems with unsafe nominal policies. To address scalability challenges in traditional synthesis methods, learning-based approaches have been proposed for designing safety filters for systems with high-dimensional state and control spaces. However, the inevitable errors in the decisions of these models raise concerns about their reliability and the safety guarantees they offer. This paper presents Adaptive Conformal Filtering (ACoFi), a method that combines learned Hamilton-Jacobi reachability-based safety filters with adaptive conformal inference. Under ACoFi, the filter dynamically adjusts its switching criteria based on the observed errors in its predictions of the safety of actions. The range of possible safety values of the nominal policy's output is used to quantify uncertainty in safety assessment. The filter switches from the nominal policy to the learned safe one when that range suggests it might be unsafe. We show that ACoFi guarantees that the rate of incorrectly quantifying uncertainty in the predicted safety of the nominal policy is asymptotically upper bounded by a user-defined parameter. This gives a soft safety guarantee rather than a hard safety guarantee. We evaluate ACoFi in a Dubins car simulation and a Safety Gymnasium environment, empirically demonstrating that it significantly outperforms the baseline method that uses a fixed switching threshold by achieving higher learned safety values and fewer safety violations, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.

Related papers

• Selective Safety Steering via Value-Filtered Decoding [54.87935112120107]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained to align with human values, but their generations may still violate safety constraints.<n>Existing decoding-time steering methods often intervene unnecessarily, modifying generations that would have been safe under the base model.<n>We propose a new test-time steering method designed to reduce such unnecessary interventions while improving the safety of unsafe responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T12:13:08Z)
• Statistically Assuring Safety of Control Systems using Ensembles of Safety Filters and Conformal Prediction [1.5335713879217925]
  Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability analysis is a fundamental method for formally verifying safety and generating safe controllers.<n>We introduce a conformal prediction-based (CP) framework that bounds such uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T06:54:16Z)
• Provably Optimal Reinforcement Learning under Safety Filtering [6.197103843323546]
  We show that enforcing safety with a permissive safety filter does not degrade inherent performance.<n>We formalize safety with a safety-critical decision process (SC-MDP), which requires categorical, rather than high-probability, avoidance of catastrophic failure states.<n>Our main theorem establishes that (i) learning in the filtered MDP is safe categorically, (ii) standard RL convergence carries over to the filtered MDP, and (iii) any policy that is optimal in the filtered MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T20:20:10Z)
• Rethinking Safety in LLM Fine-tuning: An Optimization Perspective [56.31306558218838]
  We show that poor optimization choices, rather than inherent trade-offs, often cause safety problems, measured as harmful responses to adversarial prompts.<n>We propose a simple exponential moving average (EMA) momentum technique in parameter space that preserves safety performance.<n>Our experiments on the Llama families across multiple datasets demonstrate that safety problems can largely be avoided without specialized interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T23:46:36Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Non-Markovian Safety Constraints [15.904640266226023]
  We design a safety model that performs credit assignment to assess contributions of partial state-action trajectories on safety. We derive an effective algorithm for optimizing a safe policy using the learned safety model. We devise a method to dynamically adapt the tradeoff coefficient between safety reward and safety compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T17:27:22Z)
• Multi-Step Model Predictive Safety Filters: Reducing Chattering by Increasing the Prediction Horizon [7.55113002732746]
  Safety, the satisfaction of state and input constraints, can be guaranteed by augmenting the learned control policy with a safety filter. Model predictive safety filters (MPSFs) are a common safety filtering approach based on model predictive control (MPC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T16:35:29Z)
• Meta-Learning Priors for Safe Bayesian Optimization [72.8349503901712]
  We build on a meta-learning algorithm, F-PACOH, capable of providing reliable uncertainty quantification in settings of data scarcity. As core contribution, we develop a novel framework for choosing safety-compliant priors in a data-riven manner. On benchmark functions and a high-precision motion system, we demonstrate that our meta-learned priors accelerate the convergence of safe BO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T08:38:38Z)
• Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environments [84.3830478851369]
  We propose a safe reinforcement learning approach that can jointly learn the environment and optimize the control policy. Our approach can effectively enforce hard safety constraints and significantly outperform CMDP-based baseline methods in system safe rate measured via simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T20:49:25Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
  We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Confidence-Based Filters [78.39359694273575]
  We develop a control-theoretic approach for certifying state safety constraints for nominal policies learned via standard reinforcement learning techniques. We provide formal safety guarantees, and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T11:43:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.