Who Shapes Brazil's Vaccine Debate? Semi-Supervised Modeling of Stance and Polarization in YouTube's Media Ecosystem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18586v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 19:21:01 GMT
• Title: Who Shapes Brazil's Vaccine Debate? Semi-Supervised Modeling of Stance and Polarization in YouTube's Media Ecosystem
• Abstract summary: We present the largest longitudinal study of Brazil's vaccine discourse on YouTube.<n>We map how pro- and anti-vaccine narratives evolve and circulate within a hybrid media ecosystem.
• Score: 0.6649753747542209
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vaccination remains a cornerstone of global public health, yet the COVID-19 pandemic exposed how online misinformation, political polarization, and declining institutional trust can undermine immunization efforts. Most of the prior computational studies that analyzed vaccine discourse on social platforms focus on English-language data, specific vaccines, or short time windows, impairing our understanding of long-term dynamics in high-impact, non-English contexts like Brazil, home to one of the world's most comprehensive immunization systems. We here present the largest longitudinal study of Brazil's vaccine discourse on YouTube, leveraging a semi-supervised stance detection framework that combines self-labeling and self-training to classify nearly 1.4 million comments. By integrating stance with temporal patterns, engagement metrics, and channel taxonomy (legacy media, science communicators, digital-native outlets), we map how pro- and anti-vaccine narratives evolve and circulate within a hybrid media ecosystem. Our results show that semi-supervised learning substantially improves stance classification robustness, enabling fine-grained tracking of public attitudes across Brazil's full immunization schedule. Polarization spikes during epidemiological crises, especially COVID-19, but becomes fragmented across vaccines and interaction patterns in the post-pandemic period. Notably, science communication and digital-native channels emerge as the primary loci of both supportive and oppositional engagement, revealing structural vulnerabilities in contemporary health communication. Thus, our work advances computational methods for large-scale stance modeling while offering actionable evidence for public health agencies, platform governance, and online information ecosystems.

Related papers

• The Brazilian Vaccination Debate on YouTube: Topics, Perspectives, and Engagement Dynamics [34.26153039054568]
  COVID-19 intensified disputes over scientific authority, institutional trust, and political identity.<n>We conduct a multilevel computational text analysis based on language models applied to 1.27 million Brazilian YouTube comments from 2018 to 2024.<n>Results show that COVID-19 dominates biomedical and informational themes in titles, whereas comments span personal health reports, vaccine effects, information credibility, conspiracy narratives, and political disputes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T08:28:04Z)
• The Shifting Landscape of Vaccine Discourse: Insights From a Decade of Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Vaccine Posts on Social Media [61.575555311964706]
  We analyze how English speakers talk about vaccines on social media to understand the evolving narrative around vaccines in social media posts.<n>We first introduce a novel dataset comprising 18.7 million curated posts on vaccine discourse from 2013 to 2022.<n>Our analysis shows that the COVID-19 pandemic led to complex shifts in X users' sentiment and discourse around vaccines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T22:28:59Z)
• SPEED++: A Multilingual Event Extraction Framework for Epidemic Prediction and Preparedness [73.73883111570458]
  We introduce the first multilingual Event Extraction framework for extracting epidemic event information for a wide range of diseases and languages. Annotating data in every language is infeasible; thus we develop zero-shot cross-lingual cross-disease models. Our framework can provide epidemic warnings for COVID-19 in its earliest stages in Dec 2019 from Chinese Weibo posts without any training in Chinese.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T03:03:54Z)
• Public Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Computational Analysis of the Relationship between Public Concerns and Policies [3.203095675418499]
  With the rollout of vaccination campaigns, German-speaking regions exhibited much lower vaccination uptake than other European regions. We show that skepticism regarding the severity of the COVID-19 virus and towards efficacy and safety of vaccines were among the prevalent topics in the discourse on Twitter. During later phases of the pandemic, when implemented policies restricted the freedom of unvaccinated citizens, increased vaccination uptake could be observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T15:31:13Z)
• Dynamics and triggers of misinformation on vaccines [0.552480439325792]
  We analyze 6 years of Italian vaccine debate across diverse social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube) We first use the symbolic transfer entropy analysis of news production time-series to determine which category of sources, questionable or reliable, causally drives the agenda on vaccines. We then leverage deep learning models capable to accurately classify vaccine-related content based on the conveyed stance and discussed topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T15:35:48Z)
• "Double vaccinated, 5G boosted!": Learning Attitudes towards COVID-19 Vaccination from Social Media [4.178929174617172]
  We leverage the textual posts on social media to extract and track users' vaccination stances in near real time. We integrate the recent posts of a user's social network neighbours to help detect the user's genuine attitude. Based on our annotated dataset from Twitter, the models instantiated from our framework can increase the performance of attitude extraction by up to 23%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T17:04:56Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Mining Trends of COVID-19 Vaccine Beliefs on Twitter with Lexical Embeddings [0.8808021343665321]
  We extracted a corpus of Twitter posts related to COVID-19 vaccination. We created two classes of lexical categories - Emotions and Influencing factors. Negative emotions like hesitancy towards vaccines have a high correlation with health-related effects and misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-02T16:13:16Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for COVID-19 Outbreak Alignment [90.12602012910465]
  We train on Italy's early COVID-19 outbreak through Twitter and transfer to several other countries. Our experiments show strong results with up to 0.85 Spearman correlation in cross-country predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T02:04:25Z)
• Digital Ariadne: Citizen Empowerment for Epidemic Control [55.41644538483948]
  The COVID-19 crisis represents the most dangerous threat to public health since the H1N1 pandemic of 1918. Technology-assisted location and contact tracing, if broadly adopted, may help limit the spread of infectious diseases. We present a tool, called 'diAry' or 'digital Ariadne', based on voluntary location and Bluetooth tracking on personal devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T15:53:42Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.