The Brazilian Vaccination Debate on YouTube: Topics, Perspectives, and Engagement Dynamics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17502v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:28:04 GMT
• Title: The Brazilian Vaccination Debate on YouTube: Topics, Perspectives, and Engagement Dynamics
• Abstract summary: COVID-19 intensified disputes over scientific authority, institutional trust, and political identity.<n>We conduct a multilevel computational text analysis based on language models applied to 1.27 million Brazilian YouTube comments from 2018 to 2024.<n>Results show that COVID-19 dominates biomedical and informational themes in titles, whereas comments span personal health reports, vaccine effects, information credibility, conspiracy narratives, and political disputes.
• Score: 34.26153039054568
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Vaccination debates are central to online public health communication, as COVID-19 intensified disputes over scientific authority, institutional trust, and political identity. Yet studies often isolate semantic structure, stance, misinformation, and engagement, leaving their interplay over time poorly understood. We conduct a multilevel computational text analysis based on language models applied to 1.27 million Brazilian YouTube comments from 2018 to 2024, using what is, to our knowledge, the largest dataset of Brazilian vaccine discourse on the Web. We contrast producer framing in titles with audience discourse in comments, integrating Topic-derived themes with engagement metadata, conversational timing, stance-derived vaccine positions, and pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods. Results show that COVID-19 dominates biomedical and informational themes in titles, whereas comments span personal health reports, vaccine effects, information credibility, conspiracy narratives, and political disputes. Health-related macro-topics dominate in scale and persistence, while conspiratorial and political themes are associated with faster interactions and a greater concentration of vaccine-opposing engagement. Post-pandemic activity remains centered on health experiences, vaccine effects, and information credibility, indicating no return to the pre-pandemic thematic configuration. By integrating semantic, interactional, stance, and temporal dimensions, this study shows how audiences reframe producer-framed health content and how vaccine controversies persist beyond the acute pandemic period.

Related papers

• Information Pathways in Online Science Communication: The Role of Platform Actors and News Media [43.77337899227973]
  Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we analyze 1.24M tweets and 211k news articles that reference pandemic-related scientific papers.<n>We find that the most influential Twitter accounts in this discourse are predominantly individuals with medical or research credentials.<n>We also identify a coordinated network that disproportionately amplifies a small set of prominent credentialed experts who advance contrarian, anti-consensus positions on vaccines, lockdowns, and related topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T01:08:20Z)
• Who Shapes Brazil's Vaccine Debate? Semi-Supervised Modeling of Stance and Polarization in YouTube's Media Ecosystem [0.6649753747542209]
  We present the largest longitudinal study of Brazil's vaccine discourse on YouTube.<n>We map how pro- and anti-vaccine narratives evolve and circulate within a hybrid media ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T19:21:01Z)
• The Shifting Landscape of Vaccine Discourse: Insights From a Decade of Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Vaccine Posts on Social Media [61.575555311964706]
  We analyze how English speakers talk about vaccines on social media to understand the evolving narrative around vaccines in social media posts.<n>We first introduce a novel dataset comprising 18.7 million curated posts on vaccine discourse from 2013 to 2022.<n>Our analysis shows that the COVID-19 pandemic led to complex shifts in X users' sentiment and discourse around vaccines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T22:28:59Z)
• Public Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Computational Analysis of the Relationship between Public Concerns and Policies [3.203095675418499]
  With the rollout of vaccination campaigns, German-speaking regions exhibited much lower vaccination uptake than other European regions. We show that skepticism regarding the severity of the COVID-19 virus and towards efficacy and safety of vaccines were among the prevalent topics in the discourse on Twitter. During later phases of the pandemic, when implemented policies restricted the freedom of unvaccinated citizens, increased vaccination uptake could be observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T15:31:13Z)
• Dynamics and triggers of misinformation on vaccines [0.552480439325792]
  We analyze 6 years of Italian vaccine debate across diverse social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube) We first use the symbolic transfer entropy analysis of news production time-series to determine which category of sources, questionable or reliable, causally drives the agenda on vaccines. We then leverage deep learning models capable to accurately classify vaccine-related content based on the conveyed stance and discussed topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T15:35:48Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• COVID-19 and Big Data: Multi-faceted Analysis for Spatio-temporal Understanding of the Pandemic with Social Media Conversations [4.07452542897703]
  Social media platforms have served as a vehicle for the global conversation about COVID-19. We present a framework for analysis, mining, and tracking the critical content and characteristics of social media conversations around the pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T00:45:50Z)
• Health, Psychosocial, and Social issues emanating from COVID-19 pandemic based on Social Media Comments using Natural Language Processing [8.150081210763567]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global health crisis that affects many aspects of human lives. Social media data can reveal public perceptions toward how governments and health agencies are handling the pandemic. This paper aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people globally using social media data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T17:19:50Z)
• Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
  The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world. We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research. Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.