Global Web, Local Privacy? An International Review of Web Tracking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18633v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:12:47 GMT
• Title: Global Web, Local Privacy? An International Review of Web Tracking
• Abstract summary: We evaluate websites' tracker connections for ten countries for two sets of sites.<n>Australia and the US (California) have the highest level of web tracking.<n>We find that the Common Top 525 sites have 50.5% fewer average tracker connections when accessed from EU countries.
• Score: 0.254890465057467
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Web tracking by ad networks, social networks, and other third parties is privacy-invasive. To protect users' privacy an increasing number of countries are adopting new privacy laws. However, a major reason why their application on the web is so challenging is that privacy laws are local while the web is global. To that end, we evaluate websites' tracker connections for ten countries for two sets of sites -- the global Common Top 525 and the Country-specific Top 525 sites. We find that Australia and the US (California) -- two of the three opt-out jurisdictions in our study -- have the highest level of web tracking while opt-in jurisdictions generally have lower levels. We also find that the Common Top 525 sites have 50.5\% fewer average tracker connections when accessed from EU countries compared to non-EU countries. Further, simply not interacting with cookie banners decreases trackers by 48.5\% for Germany, as measured for a sample of 36 Common Top 525 sites. These results suggest that the General Data Protection Regulation and the ePrivacy Directive have a tangible effect in reducing tracking. As 28\% of Common Top 525 sites show cookie banners in all ten countries, our results suggest a moderate Brussels effect. However, against the backdrop of global US ad tech practices, EU law primarily acts as a Brussels shield. Generally, we think that strong enforcement of privacy laws is key to increase user privacy on the web.

Related papers

• RegTrack: Uncovering Global Disparities in Third-party Advertising and Tracking [2.625007842420751]
  Third party advertising and tracking (A&T) are pervasive across the web, yet user exposure varies significantly with browser choice, browsing location, and hosting jurisdiction.<n>Our analysis reveals that browser choice, user location, and hosting jurisdiction each shape tracking exposure in distinct ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T07:21:15Z)
• Using Salient Object Detection to Identify Manipulative Cookie Banners that Circumvent GDPR [5.595574586977254]
  We study how often cookie banners comply with General Data Protection Regulation.<n>We also evaluate how frequently the banners comply with recommendations of national protection authorities.<n>Although 45% of relevant websites have fully compliant banners, we found aesthetic manipulation on 38% of compliant banners.<n>We find that 13.9% of EU websites change their banner design when the user is from the US, and EU websites are roughly 48.3% more likely to use aesthetic manipulation than non-EU websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T19:50:13Z)
• Every Keystroke You Make: A Tech-Law Measurement and Analysis of Event Listeners for Wiretapping [15.823783000812158]
  Despite the growing body of research documenting widespread lack of compliance with new privacy laws, there is a lack of robust enforcement.<n>We focus on a particularly invasive tracking technique: the use of JavaScript event listeners by third-party trackers for real-time keystroke interception on websites.<n>We find evidence that 38.52% websites installed third-party event listeners to intercept keystrokes, and that at least 3.18% websites transmitted intercepted information to a third-party server.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T12:20:52Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.<n>We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.<n>State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons [74.68176012363253]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems are built on massive swathes of public web data. We conduct the first, large-scale, longitudinal audit of the consent protocols for the web domains underlying AI training corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T16:50:18Z)
• Cultural Differences in Students' Privacy Concerns in Learning Analytics across Germany, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United States [47.11163387909141]
  Students' privacy concerns vary across national and cultural dimensions. German and Swedish students stood out as the most trusting and least concerned. Culture measured at the individual level affected the antecedents and outcomes of privacy concerns more than country-level culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:10:20Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• Analysis of Longitudinal Changes in Privacy Behavior of Android Applications [79.71330613821037]
  In this paper, we examine the trends in how Android apps have changed over time with respect to privacy. We examine the adoption of HTTPS, whether apps scan the device for other installed apps, the use of permissions for privacy-sensitive data, and the use of unique identifiers. We find that privacy-related behavior has improved with time as apps continue to receive updates, and that the third-party libraries used by apps are responsible for more issues with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T16:21:31Z)
• The Impact of User Location on Cookie Notices (Inside and Outside of the European Union) [3.719580143660037]
  We crawl 1,500 European, American, and Canadian websites from each of 18 countries. Using a series of regression models, we find that the website's Top Level Domain explains a substantial portion of the variance in cookie notice metrics. There is one exception to this finding: cookie notices differ when accessing.com domains from inside versus outside of the EU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T10:42:39Z)
• Differential Tracking Across Topical Webpages of Indian News Media [3.721918008485747]
  We propose a novel method for automatic extraction and categorization of Indian news topical subpages based on the details in their URLs. We find differential user tracking among subpages, and between subpages and homepages. embedded third-parties tend to track specific subpages simultaneously, revealing possible user profiling in action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T20:20:47Z)
• PGLP: Customizable and Rigorous Location Privacy through Policy Graph [68.3736286350014]
  We propose a new location privacy notion called PGLP, which provides a rich interface to release private locations with customizable and rigorous privacy guarantee. Specifically, we formalize a user's location privacy requirements using a textitlocation policy graph, which is expressive and customizable. Third, we design a private location trace release framework that pipelines the detection of location exposure, policy graph repair, and private trajectory release with customizable and rigorous location privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T04:25:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.