Beyond One Output: Visualizing and Comparing Distributions of Language Model Generations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18724v2
• Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:21:57 GMT
• Title: Beyond One Output: Visualizing and Comparing Distributions of Language Model Generations
• Abstract summary: GROVE is an interactive visualization that represents multiple generations as overlapping paths through a text graph.<n>We evaluate three crowdsourced user studies targeting complementary distributional tasks.
• Score: 41.44731948887627
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Users typically interact with and evaluate language models via single outputs, but each output is just one sample from a broad distribution of possible completions. This interaction hides distributional structure such as modes, uncommon edge cases, and sensitivity to small prompt changes, leading users to over-generalize from anecdotes when iterating on prompts for open-ended tasks. Informed by a formative study with researchers who use LMs (n=13) examining when stochasticity matters in practice, how they reason about distributions over language, and where current workflows break down, we introduce GROVE. GROVE is an interactive visualization that represents multiple LM generations as overlapping paths through a text graph, revealing shared structure, branching points, and clusters while preserving access to raw outputs. We evaluate across three crowdsourced user studies (N=47, 44, and 40 participants) targeting complementary distributional tasks. Our results support a hybrid workflow: graph summaries improve structural judgments such as assessing diversity, while direct output inspection remains stronger for detail-oriented questions.

Related papers

• Exposing the Unsaid: Visualizing Hidden LLM Bias through Stochastic Path Aggregation [16.63373250752545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit representational and syntactic biases that are difficult to evaluate due to the marginalization of text generation.<n>This paper introduces TreeTracer, a visual analytics tool designed to evaluate bias through aggregated comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T13:37:51Z)
• On the Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs for Simple Visual Planning Tasks [56.98385132295952]
  We evaluate how well chain-of-thought approaches generalize on a simple planning task.<n>We find that reasoning traces which combine multiple text formats yield the best (and non-trivial) OOD generalization.<n> purely text-based models consistently outperform those utilizing image-based inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T09:51:40Z)
• Contextualize-then-Aggregate: Circuits for In-Context Learning in Gemma-2 2B [51.74607395697567]
  In-Context Learning (ICL) is an intriguing ability of large language models (LLMs)<n>We use causal interventions to identify information flow in Gemma-2 2B for five naturalistic ICL tasks.<n>We find that the model infers task information using a two-step strategy we call contextualize-then-aggregate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T18:33:55Z)
• Instance-Aware Graph Prompt Learning [71.26108600288308]
  We introduce Instance-Aware Graph Prompt Learning (IA-GPL) in this paper. The process involves generating intermediate prompts for each instance using a lightweight architecture. Experiments conducted on multiple datasets and settings showcase the superior performance of IA-GPL compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T18:38:38Z)
• generAItor: Tree-in-the-Loop Text Generation for Language Model Explainability and Adaptation [28.715001906405362]
  Large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed in various downstream tasks, e.g., auto-completion, aided writing, or chat-based text generation. We tackle this shortcoming by proposing a tree-in-the-loop approach, where a visual representation of the beam search tree is the central component for analyzing, explaining, and adapting the generated outputs. We present generAItor, a visual analytics technique, augmenting the central beam search tree with various task-specific widgets, providing targeted visualizations and interaction possibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T13:09:15Z)
• On Context Utilization in Summarization with Large Language Models [83.84459732796302]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel in abstractive summarization tasks, delivering fluent and pertinent summaries. Recent advancements have extended their capabilities to handle long-input contexts, exceeding 100k tokens. We conduct the first comprehensive study on context utilization and position bias in summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T16:45:12Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• Visual Auditor: Interactive Visualization for Detection and Summarization of Model Biases [18.434430375939755]
  As machine learning (ML) systems become increasingly widespread, it is necessary to audit these systems for biases prior to their deployment. Recent research has developed algorithms for effectively identifying intersectional bias in the form of interpretable, underperforming subsets (or slices) of the data. We propose Visual Auditor, an interactive visualization tool for auditing and summarizing model biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-25T02:48:27Z)
• Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
  We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics. We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data. Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.