From Business Problems to AI Solutions: Where Does Transformation Support Fail

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18770v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:26:22 GMT
• Title: From Business Problems to AI Solutions: Where Does Transformation Support Fail
• Abstract summary: Translating business problems into well-specified machine learning solutions is a prerequisite for successful AI systems.<n>We conduct a structured narrative literature review of 18 approaches spanning requirements engineering (RE), machine learning (ML) project management, and automation.<n>We organize these approaches into a taxonomy of four families and compare them across six input artifact categories, six output artifact categories, and a transformation framework of seven stages.
• Score: 0.2659901499016883
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Translating business problems into well-specified machine learning solutions is a prerequisite for successful AI systems, yet this upstream translation is still one of the least supported steps in existing methodologies. We conduct a structured narrative literature review of 18 approaches spanning requirements engineering (RE), machine learning (ML) project management, and automation. We organize these approaches into a taxonomy of four families and compare them across six input artifact categories, six output artifact categories, and a transformation framework of seven stages, grounded in RE refinement theory and ML lifecycle process. Our study shows that most approaches list ML task or algorithm specification among their expected outputs, yet only four provide partial guidance for deriving it, and none provides systematic guidance. We characterize this gap as the Analytics Translation Problem (ATP) and derive five research recommendations addressing multi-formulation exploration, task derivation guidance, constraint-algorithm filtering, probabilistic traceability, and data-triggered revision.

Related papers

• A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System [56.40989626804489]
  This survey provides the first holistic analysis of Large Language Models-powered software engineering.<n>We review over 150 recent papers and propose a taxonomy along two key dimensions: (1) Solutions, categorized into prompt-based, fine-tuning-based, and agent-based paradigms, and (2) Benchmarks, including tasks such as code generation, translation, and repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T06:56:50Z)
• Large Language Models in Operations Research: Methods, Applications, and Challenges [9.208082097215314]
  Operations research (OR) supports complex system decision-making, with broad applications in transportation, supply chain management, and production scheduling.<n>Traditional approaches that rely on expert-driven modeling and manual parameter tuning often struggle with large-scale, dynamic, and multi-constraint problems.<n>This paper systematically reviews progress in applying large language models (LLMs) to OR, categorizing existing methods into three pathways: automatic modeling, auxiliary optimization, and direct solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T01:52:19Z)
• A Taxonomy of Prompt Defects in LLM Systems [13.177777446130712]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become key components of modern software.<n>Small mistakes can cascade into unreliable, insecure, or inefficient behavior.<n>This paper presents the first systematic survey and taxonomy of prompt defects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T20:11:22Z)
• An experimental survey and Perspective View on Meta-Learning for Automated Algorithms Selection and Parametrization [0.0]
  We provide an overview of the state of the art in this continuously evolving field.<n>AutoML makes machine learning techniques accessible to domain scientists who are interested in applying advanced analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T16:51:22Z)
• Learning Task Representations from In-Context Learning [67.66042137487287]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in in-context learning (ICL)<n>We introduce an automated formulation for encoding task information in ICL prompts as a function of attention heads.<n>The proposed method successfully extracts task-specific information from in-context demonstrations and excels in both text and regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T00:16:44Z)
• Automated Refactoring of Non-Idiomatic Python Code: A Differentiated Replication with LLMs [54.309127753635366]
  We present the results of a replication study in which we investigate GPT-4 effectiveness in recommending and suggesting idiomatic actions.<n>Our findings underscore the potential of LLMs to achieve tasks where, in the past, implementing recommenders based on complex code analyses was required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T15:41:54Z)
• Benchmarking GPT-4 on Algorithmic Problems: A Systematic Evaluation of Prompting Strategies [47.129504708849446]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Processing. LLMs lack systematic generalization, which allows to extrapolate the learned statistical regularities outside the training distribution. In this work, we offer a systematic benchmarking of GPT-4, one of the most advanced LLMs available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T10:44:52Z)
• Classification, Challenges, and Automated Approaches to Handle Non-Functional Requirements in ML-Enabled Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [10.09767622002672]
  We propose a systematic literature review targeting two key aspects: the classification of the non-functional requirements investigated so far, and the challenges to be faced when developing models in ML-enabled systems. We report that current research identified 30 different non-functional requirements, which can be grouped into six main classes. We also compiled a catalog of more than 23 software engineering challenges, based on which further research should consider the nonfunctional requirements of machine learning-enabled systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T09:45:41Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)
• TSDAE: Using Transformer-based Sequential Denoising Auto-Encoder for Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Learning [53.32740707197856]
  We present a new state-of-the-art unsupervised method based on pre-trained Transformers and Sequential Denoising Auto-Encoder (TSDAE) It can achieve up to 93.1% of the performance of in-domain supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T17:02:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.