Disparities In Negation Understanding Across Languages In Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18942v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:32:18 GMT
• Title: Disparities In Negation Understanding Across Languages In Vision-Language Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce the first human-verified multilingual negation benchmark, spanning seven typologically diverse languages.<n>We find that standard CLIP performs at or below chance on non-Latin-script languages, while MultiCLIP achieves the highest and most uniform accuracy.<n>We also evaluate SpaceVLM, a proposed negation correction, and find that it produces substantial improvements for several languages.
• Score: 13.405368749743408
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit affirmation bias: a systematic tendency to select positive captions ("X is present") even when the correct description contains negation ("no X"). While prior work has documented this failure mode in English and proposed solutions, negation manifests differently across languages through varying morphology, word order, and cliticization patterns, raising the question of whether these solutions serve all linguistic communities equitably. We introduce the first human-verified multilingual negation benchmark, spanning seven typologically diverse languages: English, Mandarin Chinese, Arabic, Greek, Russian, Tagalog, and Spanish. Evaluating three VLMs - CLIP, SigLIP, and MultiCLIP - we find that standard CLIP performs at or below chance on non-Latin-script languages, while MultiCLIP achieves the highest and most uniform accuracy. We also evaluate SpaceVLM, a proposed negation correction, and find that it produces substantial improvements for several languages - particularly English, Greek, Spanish, and Tagalog - while showing varied effectiveness across typologically different languages. This variation reveals that linguistic properties like morphology, script, and negation structure interact with model improvements in fairness-relevant ways. As VLMs are deployed globally, multilingual benchmarks are essential for understanding not just whether solutions work, but for whom.

Related papers

• MultiLexNorm++: A Unified Benchmark and a Generative Model for Lexical Normalization for Asian Languages [35.41743483735058]
  Social media data has been of interest to Natural Language Processing (NLP) practitioners for over a decade.<n>Since language use is more informal, spontaneous, and adheres to many different sociolects, the performance of NLP models often deteriorates.<n>One solution to this problem is to transform data to a standard variant before processing it, which is also called lexical normalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T10:27:40Z)
• Adapting Language Models to Indonesian Local Languages: An Empirical Study of Language Transferability on Zero-Shot Settings [1.1556013985948772]
  We evaluate transferability of pre-trained language models to low-resource Indonesian local languages.<n>We group the target languages into three categories: seen, partially seen, and unseen.<n> Multilingual models perform best on seen languages, moderately on partially seen ones, and poorly on unseen languages.<n>We find that MAD-X significantly improves performance, especially for seen and partially seen languages, without requiring labeled data in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T12:17:55Z)
• IMPACT: Inflectional Morphology Probes Across Complex Typologies [0.0]
  IMPACT is a synthetically generated evaluation framework focused on inflectional morphology.<n>It is designed to evaluate performance across five morphologically rich languages: Arabic, Russian, Finnish, Turkish, and Hebrew.<n>We assess eight multilingual LLMs that, despite strong English performance, struggle with other languages and uncommon morphological patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:58:23Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts.<n>We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion.<n>We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• MYTE: Morphology-Driven Byte Encoding for Better and Fairer Multilingual Language Modeling [70.34758460372629]
  We introduce a new paradigm that encodes the same information with segments of consistent size across diverse languages. MYTE produces shorter encodings for all 99 analyzed languages. This, in turn, improves multilingual LM performance and diminishes the perplexity gap throughout diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T21:21:11Z)
• CLSE: Corpus of Linguistically Significant Entities [58.29901964387952]
  We release a Corpus of Linguistically Significant Entities (CLSE) annotated by experts. CLSE covers 74 different semantic types to support various applications from airline ticketing to video games. We create a linguistically representative NLG evaluation benchmark in three languages: French, Marathi, and Russian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-04T12:56:12Z)
• Multi-level Contrastive Learning for Cross-lingual Spoken Language Understanding [90.87454350016121]
  We develop novel code-switching schemes to generate hard negative examples for contrastive learning at all levels. We develop a label-aware joint model to leverage label semantics for cross-lingual knowledge transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-07T13:44:28Z)
• Discovering Representation Sprachbund For Multilingual Pre-Training [139.05668687865688]
  We generate language representation from multilingual pre-trained models and conduct linguistic analysis. We cluster all the target languages into multiple groups and name each group as a representation sprachbund. Experiments are conducted on cross-lingual benchmarks and significant improvements are achieved compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T09:32:06Z)
• Inducing Language-Agnostic Multilingual Representations [61.97381112847459]
  Cross-lingual representations have the potential to make NLP techniques available to the vast majority of languages in the world. We examine three approaches for this: (i) re-aligning the vector spaces of target languages to a pivot source language; (ii) removing language-specific means and variances, which yields better discriminativeness of embeddings as a by-product; and (iii) increasing input similarity across languages by removing morphological contractions and sentence reordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T17:58:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.