Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18943v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:40:47 GMT
• Title: Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences
• Abstract summary: Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings.<n>Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized benchmarks that rank models according to individual needs.<n>We compute personalized model rankings using ELO ratings and Bradley-Terry coefficients for 115 active Arena users.
• Score: 16.446687355628566
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the rise in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their deployment in real-world tasks, evaluating LLM alignment with human preferences has become an important challenge. Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings, overlooking individual user preferences when establishing model rankings. Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized LLM benchmarks that rank models according to individual needs. We compute personalized model rankings using ELO ratings and Bradley-Terry coefficients for 115 active Chatbot Arena users and analyze how user query characteristics (topics and writing style) relate to LLM ranking variations. We demonstrate that individual rankings of LLM models diverge dramatically from aggregate LLM rankings, with Bradley-Terry correlations averaging only $ρ= 0.04$ (57\% of users show near-zero or negative correlation) and ELO ratings showing moderate correlation ($ρ= 0.43$). Through topic modeling and style analysis, we find users exhibit substantial heterogeneity in topical interests and communication styles, influencing their model preferences. We further show that a compact combination of topic and style features provides a useful feature space for predicting user-specific model rankings. Our results provide strong quantitative evidence that aggregate benchmarks fail to capture individual preferences for most users, and highlight the importance of developing personalized benchmarks that rank LLM models according to individual user preferences.

Related papers

• Who Defines "Best"? Towards Interactive, User-Defined Evaluation of LLM Leaderboards [9.132090357588686]
  LLM leaderboards are widely used to compare models and guide deployment decisions.<n>However, leaderboard rankings are shaped by evaluation priorities set by benchmark designers.<n>A single aggregate score often obscures how models behave across different prompt types and compositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T15:28:32Z)
• Towards Realistic Personalization: Evaluating Long-Horizon Preference Following in Personalized User-LLM Interactions [50.70965714314064]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users share complex and diverse preferences over extended interactions.<n>This work proposes RealPref, a benchmark for evaluating realistic preference-following in personalized user-LLM interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T15:42:43Z)
• One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment [55.86333374784959]
  We argue that addressing these constraints requires a paradigm shift from fitting data to learn user preferences to learn the process of preference adaptation.<n>We propose Meta Reward Modeling (MRM), which reformulates personalized reward modeling as a meta-learning problem.<n>We show that MRM enhances few-shot personalization, improves user robustness, and consistently outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T17:55:52Z)
• Investigating Thematic Patterns and User Preferences in LLM Interactions using BERTopic [4.087884819027264]
  This study applies BERTopic to the lmsys-chat-1m dataset, a multilingual conversational corpus built from head-to-head evaluations of large language models (LLMs)<n>The main objective is uncovering thematic patterns in these conversations and examining their relation to user preferences.<n>We analysed relationships between topics and model preferences to identify trends in model-topic alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T21:13:44Z)
• A Personalized Conversational Benchmark: Towards Simulating Personalized Conversations [112.81207927088117]
  PersonaConvBench is a benchmark for evaluating personalized reasoning and generation in multi-turn conversations with large language models (LLMs)<n>We benchmark several commercial and open-source LLMs under a unified prompting setup and observe that incorporating personalized history yields substantial performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T09:13:22Z)
• HyPerAlign: Interpretable Personalized LLM Alignment via Hypothesis Generation [24.67727411391369]
  HyPerAlign is an interpretable and sample-efficient hypothesis-driven personalization approach for large language models.<n>We conduct experiments on two different personalization tasks, namely authorship attribution and deliberative alignment.<n>Results demonstrate the superiority of hypothesis-driven personalization compared to preference-based fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T18:01:46Z)
• Measuring What Makes You Unique: Difference-Aware User Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalization [68.79814761867314]
  We propose Difference-aware Personalization Learning (DPL) to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) personalization.<n>DPL strategically selects representative users for comparison and establishes a structured standard to extract task-relevant differences.<n>Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that DPL significantly enhances LLM personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T09:53:26Z)
• FSPO: Few-Shot Preference Optimization of Synthetic Preference Data in LLMs Elicits Effective Personalization to Real Users [111.56469697145519]
  We propose Few-Shot Preference Optimization, which reframes reward modeling as a meta-learning problem.<n>Under this framework, an LLM learns to quickly adapt to a user via a few labeled preferences from that user, constructing a personalized reward function for them.<n>We generate over 1M synthetic personalized preferences using publicly available LLMs.<n>We evaluate FSPO on personalized open-ended generation for up to 1,500 synthetic users across three domains: movie reviews, pedagogical adaptation based on educational background, and general question answering, along with a controlled human study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T17:08:46Z)
• ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization [122.54846260663922]
  ComPO is a method to personalize preference optimization in language models. We collect and release ComPRed, a question answering dataset with community-level preferences from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T14:02:40Z)
• PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences [11.717169516971856]
  We present a public benchmark, PersonalLLM, focusing on adapting LLMs to provide maximal benefits for a particular user.<n>We curate open-ended prompts paired with many high-quality answers over which users would be expected to display heterogeneous latent preferences.<n>Our dataset and generated personalities offer an innovative testbed for developing personalization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T13:55:42Z)
• LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMs [41.60364110693824]
  Personalization plays a critical role in numerous language tasks and applications, since users with the same requirements may prefer diverse outputs based on their individual interests. This has led to the development of various personalized approaches aimed at adapting large language models (LLMs) to generate customized outputs aligned with user preferences. We propose a novel personalized LLM model, ours. It constructs a user-specific embedding for each individual by modeling all her historical contexts through a lightweight plug-in user embedder module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T11:54:45Z)
• On the steerability of large language models toward data-driven personas [98.9138902560793]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate biased responses where the opinions of certain groups and populations are underrepresented. Here, we present a novel approach to achieve controllable generation of specific viewpoints using LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T19:01:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.