Relational AI in Education: Reciprocity, Participatory Design, and Indigenous Worldviews
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19099v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:25:11 GMT
- Title: Relational AI in Education: Reciprocity, Participatory Design, and Indigenous Worldviews
- Abstract summary: We re-centre education as relational and frame learner-AI interactions as context-specific relationships.<n>We argue that meaningful educational AI should support learning with others rather than replace them.
- Score: 0.6825805890534121
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Education is not merely the transmission of information or the optimisation of individual performance; it is a fundamentally social, constructive, and relational practice. However, recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) increasingly emphasise efficiency, automation, and individualised assistance, risking the weakening of relational learning processes. Despite growing adoption, AI in education (AIED) research has yet to fully articulate how AI can be designed in ways that sustain the social and ecological relationships through which learning occurs. In this paper, we re-centre education as relational and frame learner-AI interactions as context-specific relationships with clearly defined purposes and boundaries, rather than positioning them as substitutes for, or replacements of, human interaction. Grounded in participatory design practices and inspired by Indigenous worldviews (including Aboriginal Australian, Native American, and Mesoamerican traditions) that foreground reciprocity and relational accountability, we argue that meaningful educational AI should support learning with others rather than replace them. We advance this perspective by: i) conceptualising AIED as a relational design problem grounded in reciprocity; ii) articulating key tensions introduced by GenAI in education; and iii) outlining design directions that expand the AIED design space toward reciprocity, including when not to use AI, how to define pedagogical boundaries, and how to support responsible uses of AIED innovations that sustain communities and natural environments.
Related papers
- Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment in Education for Trustworthy Learning Environments [7.0064528229443]
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, offering unprecedented opportunities to personalize learning, enhance assessment, and support educators.<n>Yet these opportunities also introduce risks related to equity, privacy, and student autonomy.<n>This chapter develops the concept of bidirectional human-AI alignment in education, emphasizing that trustworthy learning environments arise not only from embedding human values into AI systems but also from equipping teachers, students, and institutions with the skills to interpret, critique, and guide these technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-25T07:50:56Z) - Integrating Generative AI into LMS: Reshaping Learning and Instructional Design [1.2489632787815885]
We propose two guiding principles for integrating generative AI into Learning Management Systems.<n>First, From Content Delivery to Fostering Higher-Order Thinking, emphasizing AI's role in supporting inquiry, collaboration, and reflective knowledge building.<n>Second, Toward Meaningful Interaction with AI, highlighting the design of learning environments that nurture critical, intentional, and socially mediated engagement with AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T18:58:47Z) - Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z) - A Conceptual Exploration of Generative AI-Induced Cognitive Dissonance and its Emergence in University-Level Academic Writing [0.0]
This work explores how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) serves as both a trigger and amplifier of cognitive dissonance (CD)<n>We introduce a hypothetical construct of GenAI-induced CD, illustrating the tension between AI-driven efficiency and the principles of originality, effort, and intellectual ownership.<n>We discuss strategies to mitigate this dissonance, including reflective pedagogy, AI literacy programs, transparency in GenAI use, and discipline-specific task redesigns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T21:31:04Z) - Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z) - Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment [109.57781720848669]
We argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI.<n>We introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z) - From Algorithm Worship to the Art of Human Learning: Insights from 50-year journey of AI in Education [0.0]
Current discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) oscillates between hope and apprehension.
This paper delves into the complexities of AI's role in Education, addressing the mixed messages that have both enthused and alarmed educators.
It explores the promises that AI holds for enhancing learning through personalisation at scale, against the backdrop of concerns about ethical implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T16:12:14Z) - Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other.
This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z) - Towards social generative AI for education: theory, practices and ethics [0.0]
Building social generative AI for education will require development of powerful AI systems that can converse with each other as well as humans.
We need to consider how to design and constrain social generative AI for education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-14T17:30:48Z) - AGI: Artificial General Intelligence for Education [41.45039606933712]
This position paper reviews artificial general intelligence (AGI)'s key concepts, capabilities, scope, and potential within future education.
It highlights that AGI can significantly improve intelligent tutoring systems, educational assessment, and evaluation procedures.
The paper emphasizes that AGI's capabilities extend to understanding human emotions and social interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-24T22:31:59Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.