Large Language Models Exhibit Normative Conformity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19301v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:06:25 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models Exhibit Normative Conformity
• Abstract summary: This study introduces the social psychological distinction between informational conformity and normative conformity.<n>Experiments show that up to five exhibited tendencies toward not only informational conformity but also normative conformity.<n>Findings suggest that decision-making in LLM-MAS may be vulnerable to manipulation by a small number of malicious users.
• Score: 3.3132106391262934
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The conformity bias exhibited by large language models (LLMs) can pose a significant challenge to decision-making in LLM-based multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS). While many prior studies have treated "conformity" simply as a matter of opinion change, this study introduces the social psychological distinction between informational conformity and normative conformity in order to understand LLM conformity at the mechanism level. Specifically, we design new tasks to distinguish between informational conformity, in which participants in a discussion are motivated to make accurate judgments, and normative conformity, in which participants are motivated to avoid conflict or gain acceptance within a group. We then conduct experiments based on these task settings. The experimental results show that, among the six LLMs evaluated, up to five exhibited tendencies toward not only informational conformity but also normative conformity. Furthermore, intriguingly, we demonstrate that by manipulating subtle aspects of the social context, it may be possible to control the target toward which a particular LLM directs its normative conformity. These findings suggest that decision-making in LLM-MAS may be vulnerable to manipulation by a small number of malicious users. In addition, through analysis of internal vectors associated with informational and normative conformity, we suggest that although both behaviors appear externally as the same form of "conformity," they may in fact be driven by distinct internal mechanisms. Taken together, these results may serve as an initial milestone toward understanding how "norms" are implemented in LLMs and how they influence group dynamics.

Related papers

• Persuasive and Compliant Tendencies Predict Group Decision-Making in Humans and Language Models [65.21691850622413]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in group decision-making with humans.<n>We introduce DecisionQE, a questionnaire-based framework for measuring each model's persuasive and compliant tendencies.<n>We show that stronger persuasive tendency does not significantly improve group outcomes, whereas compliant-oriented models show more stable advantages in cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T15:50:56Z)
• Computational Basis of LLM's Decision Making in Social Simulation [2.0273234820549977]
  Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as human-like decision-making agents in social science and applied settings.<n>This study proposes and tests methods for probing, quantifying, and modifying an LLM's internal representations in a Dictator Game.<n>Manipulating these vectors during the model's inference can substantially alter how those variables relate to the model's decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T00:02:28Z)
• Societal Alignment Frameworks Can Improve LLM Alignment [50.97852062232431]
  We argue that improving LLM alignment requires incorporating insights from societal alignment frameworks.<n>We then investigate how uncertainty within societal alignment frameworks manifests in LLM alignment.<n>We end our discussion by offering an alternative view on LLM alignment, framing the underspecified nature of its objectives as an opportunity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T13:26:07Z)
• Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Models [46.23852835759767]
  This paper presents a study on conformity in large language models (LLMs) driven collaborative AI systems.<n>We focus on three aspects: the existence of conformity, the factors influencing conformity, and potential mitigation strategies.<n>Our analysis delves into factors influencing conformity, including interaction time and majority size, and examines how the subject agent rationalizes its conforming behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T04:50:03Z)
• Conformity in Large Language Models [26.963909402233213]
  Conformity to incorrect responses can compromise language models' effectiveness.<n>In this paper, we adapt psychological experiments to examine the extent of conformity in popular large language models.<n>We are the first to show that LLMs are more likely to conform when they are more uncertain in their own prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T10:16:34Z)
• Evaluating the Correctness of Inference Patterns Used by LLMs for Judgment [53.17596274334017]
  We evaluate the correctness of the detailed inference patterns of an LLM behind its seemingly correct outputs.<n>Experiments show that even when the language generation results appear correct, a significant portion of the inference patterns used by the LLM for the legal judgment may represent misleading or irrelevant logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T08:33:39Z)
• Decision-Making Behavior Evaluation Framework for LLMs under Uncertain Context [5.361970694197912]
  This paper proposes a framework, grounded in behavioral economics, to evaluate the decision-making behaviors of large language models (LLMs) We estimate the degree of risk preference, probability weighting, and loss aversion in a context-free setting for three commercial LLMs: ChatGPT-4.0-Turbo, Claude-3-Opus, and Gemini-1.0-pro. Our results reveal that LLMs generally exhibit patterns similar to humans, such as risk aversion and loss aversion, with a tendency to overweight small probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T02:14:19Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• A Theory of Response Sampling in LLMs: Part Descriptive and Part Prescriptive [53.08398658452411]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in autonomous decision-making.<n>We show that this sampling behavior resembles that of human decision-making.<n>We show that this deviation of a sample from the statistical norm towards a prescriptive component consistently appears in concepts across diverse real-world domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:28:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.