A Dual Perspective on Synthetic Trajectory Generators: Utility Framework and Privacy Vulnerabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19653v2
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:20:46 GMT
• Title: A Dual Perspective on Synthetic Trajectory Generators: Utility Framework and Privacy Vulnerabilities
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a new framework for utility evaluation.<n>We provide evidence that privacy evaluation remains a great challenge to consider.<n>We propose a new membership inference attack against a subcategory of generative models.
• Score: 0.43165068185800287
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human mobility data are used in numerous applications, ranging from public health to urban planning. Human mobility is inherently sensitive, as it can contain information such as religious beliefs and political affiliations. Historically, it has been proposed to modify the information using techniques such as aggregation, obfuscation, or noise addition, to adequately protect privacy and eliminate concerns. As these methods come at a great cost in utility, new methods leveraging development in generative models, were introduced. The extent to which such methods answer the privacy-utility trade-off remains an open problem. In this paper, we introduced a first step towards solving it, by the introduction and application of a new framework for utility evaluation. Furthermore, we provide evidence that privacy evaluation remains a great challenge to consider and that it should be tackled through adversarial evaluation in accordance with the current EU regulation. We propose a new membership inference attack against a subcategory of generative models, even though this subcategory was deemed private due to its resistance over the trajectory user-linking problem.

Related papers

• IP Protection in the Era of Visual Generative AI: A Survey [70.06761647752164]
  This survey presents a two-dimensional taxonomy for IP protection in visual generative models.<n>The primary axis is a Control Logic View, which classifies methods into Information Exposure Control, Generative Behavior Constraint, and Attribution & Accountability.<n>The secondary axis distinguishes Data IP from Model IP as cross-cutting asset dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T00:26:41Z)
• Privacy Evaluation of Generative Models for Trajectory Generation [0.3998450019209938]
  Traversay data is fundamental to modern urban intelligence, yet its sensitivity raises privacy concerns.<n>We investigate intersection of generative trajectory modeling and privacy evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T10:57:34Z)
• Neural Gate: Mitigating Privacy Risks in LVLMs via Neuron-Level Gradient Gating [71.55435880263238]
  We introduce Neural Gate, a novel method for mitigating privacy risks through neuron-level model editing.<n>Our method improves a model's privacy safeguards by increasing its rate of refusal for privacy-related questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T03:03:20Z)
• Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Models [28.389198065125314]
  selective forgetting (also known as machine unlearning) has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>Despite its promise, selective forgetting raises significant privacy concerns.<n>We present the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating privacy vulnerabilities in selective forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T20:04:06Z)
• Adaptive Backtracking for Privacy Protection in Large Language Models [22.340767807000212]
  This paper introduces a novel objective: enterprise-oriented privacy concerns.<n>Existing methods such as data sanitization severely degrade model performance.<n>We propose ABack, a training-free mechanism that leverages a Hidden State Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T07:29:33Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• Technical Report for the Forgotten-by-Design Project: Targeted Obfuscation for Machine Learning [0.03749861135832072]
  This paper explores the concept of the Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) within AI systems, contrasting it with traditional data erasure methods.<n>We introduce Forgotten by Design, a proactive approach to privacy preservation that integrates instance-specific obfuscation techniques.<n>Our experiments on the CIFAR-10 dataset demonstrate that our techniques reduce privacy risks by at least an order of magnitude while maintaining model accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T15:07:59Z)
• Targeted Unlearning with Single Layer Unlearning Gradient [15.374381635334897]
  Machine unlearning methods aim to remove sensitive or unwanted content from trained models.<n>We propose Single Layer Unlearning Gradient computation (SLUG) as an efficient method to unlearn targeted information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T15:52:36Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained Models [112.48136829374741]
  In this paper, we unveil a new vulnerability: the privacy backdoor attack. When a victim fine-tunes a backdoored model, their training data will be leaked at a significantly higher rate than if they had fine-tuned a typical model. Our findings highlight a critical privacy concern within the machine learning community and call for a reevaluation of safety protocols in the use of open-source pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Enabling Trade-offs in Privacy and Utility in Genomic Data Beacons and Summary Statistics [26.99521354120141]
  We introduce optimization-based approaches to explicitly trade off the utility of summary data or Beacon responses and privacy. In the first, an attacker applies a likelihood-ratio test to make membership-inference claims. In the second, an attacker uses a threshold that accounts for the effect of the data release on the separation in scores between individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T19:16:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.