ESGLens: An LLM-Based RAG Framework for Interactive ESG Report Analysis and Score Prediction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19779v1
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:46:03 GMT
- Title: ESGLens: An LLM-Based RAG Framework for Interactive ESG Report Analysis and Score Prediction
- Abstract summary: ESGLens is a report-processing module segments heterogeneous PDF content into typed chunks.<n>A GRI-guided extraction module retrieves and synthesizes information aligned with specific standards.<n>A scoring module embeds extracted summaries and feeds them to a regression model trained against London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) reference scores.
- Score: 0.42970700836450487
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reports are central to investment decision-making, yet their length, heterogeneous content, and lack of standardized structure make manual analysis costly and inconsistent. We present ESGLens, a proof-of-concept framework combining retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with prompt-engineered extraction to automate three tasks: (1)~structured information extraction guided by Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, (2)~interactive question-answering with source traceability, and (3)~ESG score prediction via regression on LLM-generated embeddings. ESGLens is purpose-built for the domain: a report-processing module segments heterogeneous PDF content into typed chunks (text, tables, charts); a GRI-guided extraction module retrieves and synthesizes information aligned with specific standards; and a scoring module embeds extracted summaries and feeds them to a regression model trained against London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) reference scores. We evaluate the framework on approximately 300 reports from companies in the QQQ, S\&P~500, and Russell~1000 indices (fiscal year 2022). Among three embedding methods (ChatGPT, BERT, RoBERTa) and two regressors (Neural Network, LightGBM), ChatGPT embeddings with a Neural Network achieve a Pearson correlation of 0.48 ($R^{2} \approx 0.23$) against LSEG ground-truth scores -- a modest but statistically meaningful signal given the ${\sim}300$-report training set and restriction to the environmental pillar. A traceability audit shows that 8 of 10 extracted claims verify against the source document, with two failures attributable to few-shot example leakage. We discuss limitations including dataset size and restriction to environmental indicators, and release the code to support reproducibility.
Related papers
- From Detection to Response: A Deep Learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Network Intrusion Mitigation [0.7136933021609079]
This paper presents a unified, end-to-end framework that closes the gap between threat detection and actionable response.<n>The system operates in two tightly coupled stages. First, an ensemble of three independently trained binary Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) classifies network traffic flows as Benign, Denial of Service (DoS) or Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)<n>Second, a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline constructs explanation-aware prompts from the top-5 anomalous features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T07:17:55Z) - ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
$textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z) - Performance Evaluation of LLMs in Automated RDF Knowledge Graph Generation [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising approach to automate RDF knowledge graph generation.<n>We evaluate multiple LLMs and prompting strategies for automated RDF extraction using a controlled framework.<n>Our analysis shows that Few-Shot learning is the most effective strategy, with Llama achieving a 99.35% F1 score and 100% valid RDF output.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T06:30:35Z) - An Empirical Framework for Evaluating Semantic Preservation Using Hugging Face [2.8203629958608722]
We define semantic preservation in LESS as the property that optimizations of intelligent components do not alter the system's overall functional behavior.<n>This paper introduces an empirical framework to evaluate semantic preservation in LESS by mining model evolution data from HuggingFace.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-08T19:14:21Z) - OntoMetric: An Ontology-Guided Framework for Automated ESG Knowledge Graph Construction [4.736397889087109]
OntoMetric is an ontology-guided framework that transforms ESG regulatory documents into validated, AI- and web-ready knowledge graphs.<n>OntoMetric achieves 65-90% semantic accuracy and 80-90% schema compliance, compared to 3-10% for baseline unconstrained extraction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T05:21:22Z) - RefineBench: Evaluating Refinement Capability of Language Models via Checklists [71.02281792867531]
We evaluate two refinement modes: guided refinement and self-refinement.<n>In guided refinement, both proprietary LMs and large open-weight LMs can leverage targeted feedback to refine responses to near-perfect levels within five turns.<n>These findings suggest that frontier LMs require breakthroughs to self-refine their incorrect responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T07:20:52Z) - MARAG-R1: Beyond Single Retriever via Reinforcement-Learned Multi-Tool Agentic Retrieval [50.30107119622642]
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at reasoning and generation but are inherently limited by static pretraining data.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by grounding LLMs in external knowledge.<n>MarAG-R1 is a reinforcement-learned multi-tool RAG framework that enables LLMs to dynamically coordinate multiple retrieval mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T15:51:39Z) - Towards Global Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Benchmark for Corpus-Level Reasoning [50.27838512822097]
We introduce GlobalQA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate global RAG capabilities.<n>We propose GlobalRAG, a multi-tool collaborative framework that preserves structural coherence through chunk-level retrieval.<n>On the Qwen2.5-14B model, GlobalRAG achieves 6.63 F1 compared to the strongest baseline's 1.51 F1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T07:29:14Z) - Loong: Synthesize Long Chain-of-Thoughts at Scale through Verifiers [103.4410890572479]
We introduce the Loong Project: an open-source framework for scalable synthetic data generation and verification.<n>LoongBench is a curated seed dataset containing 8,729 human-vetted examples across 12 domains.<n>LoongEnv is a modular synthetic data generation environment that supports multiple prompting strategies to produce new question-answer-code triples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-03T06:42:40Z) - Open-Source Agentic Hybrid RAG Framework for Scientific Literature Review [2.092154729589438]
We present an agentic approach that encapsulates the hybrid RAG pipeline within an autonomous agent.<n>Our pipeline ingests bibliometric open-access data from PubMed, arXiv, and Google Scholar APIs.<n>A Llama-3.3-70B agent selects GraphRAG (translating queries to Cypher for KG) or VectorRAG (combining sparse and dense retrieval with re-ranking)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T18:54:15Z) - Learning Efficient and Generalizable Graph Retriever for Knowledge-Graph Question Answering [75.12322966980003]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong inductive reasoning ability across various domains.<n>Most existing RAG pipelines rely on unstructured text, limiting interpretability and structured reasoning.<n>Recent studies have explored integrating knowledge graphs with LLMs for knowledge graph question answering.<n>We propose RAPL, a novel framework for efficient and effective graph retrieval in KGQA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-11T12:03:52Z) - LLM-BABYBENCH: Understanding and Evaluating Grounded Planning and Reasoning in LLMs [2.1164936096078515]
$textbfLLM-BabyBench$ is a benchmark suite for assessing the capacity of Large Language Models to plan and reason within the constraints of interactive environments.<n>Built upon a textual adaptation of the procedurally generated BabyAI grid world, this suite evaluates LLMs on three fundamental aspects of grounded intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T20:23:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.