Hidden Reliability Risks in Large Language Models: Systematic Identification of Precision-Induced Output Disagreements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19790v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 03:38:47 GMT
• Title: Hidden Reliability Risks in Large Language Models: Systematic Identification of Precision-Induced Output Disagreements
• Abstract summary: PrecisionDiff is an automated differential testing framework for detecting precision-induced behavioral disagreements in large language models.<n>Our work enables automated precision-sensitive test generation, facilitating effective pre-deployment evaluation and improving precision robustness during training.
• Score: 41.15158202095155
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed under diverse numerical precision configurations, including standard floating-point formats (e.g., bfloat16 and float16) and quantized integer formats (e.g., int16 and int8), to meet efficiency and resource constraints. However, minor inconsistencies between LLMs of different precisions are difficult to detect and are often overlooked by existing evaluation methods. In this paper, we present PrecisionDiff, an automated differential testing framework for systematically detecting precision-induced behavioral disagreements in LLMs. PrecisionDiff generates precision-sensitive test inputs and performs cross-precision comparative analysis to uncover subtle divergences that remain hidden under conventional testing strategies. To demonstrate its practical significance, we instantiate PrecisionDiff on the alignment verification task, where precision-induced disagreements manifest as jailbreak divergence-inputs that are rejected under one precision may produce harmful responses under another. Experimental results show that such behavioral disagreements are widespread across multiple open-source aligned LLMs and precision settings, and that PrecisionDiff significantly outperforms vanilla testing methods in detecting these issues. Our work enables automated precision-sensitive test generation, facilitating effective pre-deployment evaluation and improving precision robustness during training.

Related papers

• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection [105.14032334647932]
  Machine-generated texts (MGTs) pose risks such as disinformation and phishing, highlighting the need for reliable detection.<n> Metric-based methods, which extract statistically distinguishable features of MGTs, are often more practical than complex model-based methods that are prone to overfitting.<n>We propose a Markov-informed score calibration strategy that models two relationships of context detection scores that may aid calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T16:06:12Z)
• Reasoning's Razor: Reasoning Improves Accuracy but Can Hurt Recall at Critical Operating Points in Safety and Hallucination Detection [21.190105743961798]
  Reasoning has become a central paradigm for large language models (LLMs)<n>We present the first systematic study of reasoning for classification tasks under strict low false positive rate regimes.<n>Our results reveal a clear trade-off: Think On (reasoning-augmented) generation improves overall accuracy, but underperforms at the low-FPR thresholds essential for practical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T23:23:36Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Numerical Sources of Nondeterminism in LLM Inference [31.2331188304598]
  Changing system configuration, such as evaluation batch size, GPU count, and GPU version, can introduce significant differences in the generated responses.<n>We trace the root cause of this variability to the non-associative nature of floating-point arithmetic under limited numerical precision.<n>Inspired by this, we develop a lightweight inference pipeline, dubbed LayerCast, that stores weights in 16-bit precision but performs all computations in FP32.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T08:23:53Z)
• Conformal Segmentation in Industrial Surface Defect Detection with Statistical Guarantees [2.0257616108612373]
  In industrial settings, surface defects on steel can significantly compromise its service life and elevate potential safety risks.<n>Traditional defect detection methods predominantly rely on manual inspection, which suffers from low efficiency and high costs.<n>We develop a statistically rigorous threshold based on a user-defined risk level to identify high-probability defective pixels in test images.<n>We demonstrate robust and efficient control over the expected test set error rate across varying calibration-to-test ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T16:33:56Z)
• Threshold-Consistent Margin Loss for Open-World Deep Metric Learning [42.03620337000911]
  Existing losses used in deep metric learning (DML) for image retrieval often lead to highly non-uniform intra-class and inter-class representation structures. Inconsistency often complicates the threshold selection process when deploying commercial image retrieval systems. We propose a novel variance-based metric called Operating-Point-Inconsistency-Score (OPIS) that quantifies the variance in the operating characteristics across classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T21:16:41Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• Detecting Errors and Estimating Accuracy on Unlabeled Data with Self-training Ensembles [38.23896575179384]
  We propose a principled and practically effective framework that simultaneously addresses the two tasks. One instantiation reduces the estimation error for unsupervised accuracy estimation by at least 70% and improves the F1 score for error detection by at least 4.7%. On iWildCam, one instantiation reduces the estimation error for unsupervised accuracy estimation by at least 70% and improves the F1 score for error detection by at least 4.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T21:32:51Z)
• NADS: Neural Architecture Distribution Search for Uncertainty Awareness [79.18710225716791]
  Machine learning (ML) systems often encounter Out-of-Distribution (OoD) errors when dealing with testing data coming from a distribution different from training data. Existing OoD detection approaches are prone to errors and even sometimes assign higher likelihoods to OoD samples. We propose Neural Architecture Distribution Search (NADS) to identify common building blocks among all uncertainty-aware architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:39:07Z)
• Combining Deep Learning and Verification for Precise Object Instance Detection [13.810783248835186]
  We develop a set of verification tests which a proposed detection must pass to be accepted. We show that these tests can improve the overall accuracy of a base detector and that accepted examples are highly likely to be correct. This allows the detector to operate in a high precision regime and can thus be used for robotic perception systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T18:11:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.