Measuring Creativity in the Age of Generative AI: Distinguishing Human and AI-Generated Creative Performance in Hiring and Talent Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19799v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:49:17 GMT
• Title: Measuring Creativity in the Age of Generative AI: Distinguishing Human and AI-Generated Creative Performance in Hiring and Talent Systems
• Abstract summary: This paper reconceptualizes creativity as a distributional and process-based property that emerges under shared constraints and competitive incentives.<n>We introduce a quantitative framework for measuring creativity as novelty in synthesis, operationalized through idea generation and idea transformation within embedding space.<n>The findings suggest that in the age of generative AI, distinctiveness rather than fluency becomes the primary signal of human creative capability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI is rapidly transforming how organizations create value and evaluate talent. While large language models enhance baseline output quality, they simultaneously introduce ambiguity in assessing human creativity, as observable artifacts may be partially or fully AI-generated. This paper reconceptualizes creativity as a distributional and process-based property that emerges under shared constraints and competitive incentives. We introduce a quantitative framework for measuring creativity as novelty in synthesis, operationalized through idea generation and idea transformation within embedding space. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that the proposed metrics align with intuitive judgments of creativity while capturing distinctions that surface-level quality assessments miss. We further identify a structural shift toward bimodal distributions of creative output in AI-mediated environments, with implications for hiring, leadership, and competitive strategy. The findings suggest that in the age of generative AI, distinctiveness rather than fluency becomes the primary signal of human creative capability.

Related papers

• On the Creativity of AI Agents [5.734448042909701]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated human- and even superhuman-level performance across multiple domains.<n>In this paper, we analyse creativity along two complementary macro-level perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T19:19:59Z)
• CreativeBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Machine Creativity via Self-Evolving Challenges [69.3795501613098]
  We introduce CreativeBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine creativity in code generation.<n>CreativeBench objectively distinguishes creativity from hallucination via a unified metric defined as the product of quality and novelty.<n>We propose EvoRePE, a plug-and-play inference-time steering strategy that internalizes evolutionary search patterns to consistently enhance machine creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T12:36:56Z)
• Creativity in AI as Emergence from Domain-Limited Generative Models [0.0]
  evaluative frameworks largely treat creativity as a property to be assessed rather than as a phenomenon to be explicitly modeled.<n>This paper proposes a generative perspective on creativity in AI, framing it as an emergent property of domain-limited generative models embedded within bounded informational environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T09:52:14Z)
• CreativityPrism: A Holistic Benchmark for Large Language Model Creativity [64.18257552903151]
  Creativity is often seen as a hallmark of human intelligence.<n>There is still no holistic framework to evaluate their creativity across diverse scenarios.<n>We propose CreativityPrism, an evaluation analysis framework that decomposes creativity into three dimensions: quality, novelty, and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T00:22:10Z)
• What Shapes a Creative Machine Mind? Comprehensively Benchmarking Creativity in Foundation Models [16.81217474424392]
  We introduce C2-Eval, a holistic benchmark for unified assessment of creativity in foundation models (FMs)<n>C2-Eval distinguishes between two complementary forms of creativity: convergent creativity, where tasks admit constrained solutions, and divergent creativity, where tasks are open-ended.<n>Our results show that C2-Eval is an effective lens for examining the evolving landscape of creative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T03:00:50Z)
• Combinatorial Creativity: A New Frontier in Generalization Abilities [14.121904952399975]
  We study the scaling behavior of creativity for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that for fixed compute budgets, there exist optimal model depths and widths for creative ability.<n>We find that the ideation-execution gap, whereby LLMs excel at generating novel scientific ideas but struggle to ensure their practical feasibility, may be explained by a fundamental novelty-utility tradeoff characteristic of creativity algorithms in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T11:48:37Z)
• Extended Creativity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Human-AI Creative Relations [0.6031721946649193]
  We identify three fundamental modes by which AI can support and shape creative processes.<n>Support, where AI acts as a tool; Synergy, where AI and humans collaborate in complementary ways; and Symbiosis, where human and AI cognition become so integrated that they form a unified creative system.<n>We examine how each configuration influences different levels of creativity from everyday problem solving to paradigm shifting innovation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T00:16:52Z)
• Creativity in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: A Survey [56.25583236738877]
  Large language model (LLM)-driven multi-agent systems (MAS) are transforming how humans and AIs collaboratively generate ideas and artifacts.<n>This is the first survey dedicated to creativity in MAS.<n>We focus on text and image generation tasks, and present: (1) a taxonomy of agent proactivity and persona design; (2) an overview of generation techniques, including divergent exploration, iterative refinement, and collaborative synthesis, as well as relevant datasets and evaluation metrics; and (3) a discussion of key challenges, such as inconsistent evaluation standards, insufficient bias mitigation, coordination conflicts, and the lack of unified benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T12:36:14Z)
• Probing and Inducing Combinational Creativity in Vision-Language Models [52.76981145923602]
  Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have sparked debate about whether their outputs reflect combinational creativity.<n>We propose the Identification-Explanation-Implication (IEI) framework, which decomposes creative processes into three levels.<n>To validate this framework, we curate CreativeMashup, a high-quality dataset of 666 artist-generated visual mashups annotated according to the IEI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:38:18Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Towards Creativity Characterization of Generative Models via Group-based Subset Scanning [64.6217849133164]
  We propose group-based subset scanning to identify, quantify, and characterize creative processes. We find that creative samples generate larger subsets of anomalies than normal or non-creative samples across datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T15:07:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.