On the Creativity of AI Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13242v2
• Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 17:26:42 GMT
• Title: On the Creativity of AI Agents
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated human- and even superhuman-level performance across multiple domains.<n>In this paper, we analyse creativity along two complementary macro-level perspectives.
• Score: 5.734448042909701
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs), particularly when integrated into agentic systems, have demonstrated human- and even superhuman-level performance across multiple domains. Whether these systems can truly be considered creative, however, remains a matter of debate, as conclusions heavily depend on the definitions, evaluation methods, and specific use cases employed. In this paper, we analyse creativity along two complementary macro-level perspectives. The first is a functionalist perspective, focusing on the observable characteristics of creative outputs. The second is an ontological perspective, emphasising the underlying processes, as well as the social and personal dimensions involved in creativity. We focus on LLM agents and we argue that they exhibit functionalist creativity, albeit not at its most sophisticated levels, while they continue to lack key aspects of ontological creativity. Finally, we discuss whether it is desirable for agentic systems to attain both forms of creativity, evaluating potential benefits and risks, and proposing pathways toward artificial creativity that can enhance human society.

Related papers

• Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity [55.46056199651459]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in research and innovation.<n>Here we demonstrate that multi-agent LLM teams substantially outperform human teams in creativity.<n>This advantage is driven by novelty while maintaining comparable usefulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T05:52:11Z)
• Measuring Creativity in the Age of Generative AI: Distinguishing Human and AI-Generated Creative Performance in Hiring and Talent Systems [0.0]
  This paper reconceptualizes creativity as a distributional and process-based property that emerges under shared constraints and competitive incentives.<n>We introduce a quantitative framework for measuring creativity as novelty in synthesis, operationalized through idea generation and idea transformation within embedding space.<n>The findings suggest that in the age of generative AI, distinctiveness rather than fluency becomes the primary signal of human creative capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T12:49:17Z)
• CreativeBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Machine Creativity via Self-Evolving Challenges [69.3795501613098]
  We introduce CreativeBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine creativity in code generation.<n>CreativeBench objectively distinguishes creativity from hallucination via a unified metric defined as the product of quality and novelty.<n>We propose EvoRePE, a plug-and-play inference-time steering strategy that internalizes evolutionary search patterns to consistently enhance machine creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T12:36:56Z)
• CreativityPrism: A Holistic Benchmark for Large Language Model Creativity [64.18257552903151]
  Creativity is often seen as a hallmark of human intelligence.<n>There is still no holistic framework to evaluate their creativity across diverse scenarios.<n>We propose CreativityPrism, an evaluation analysis framework that decomposes creativity into three dimensions: quality, novelty, and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T00:22:10Z)
• What Shapes a Creative Machine Mind? Comprehensively Benchmarking Creativity in Foundation Models [16.81217474424392]
  We introduce C2-Eval, a holistic benchmark for unified assessment of creativity in foundation models (FMs)<n>C2-Eval distinguishes between two complementary forms of creativity: convergent creativity, where tasks admit constrained solutions, and divergent creativity, where tasks are open-ended.<n>Our results show that C2-Eval is an effective lens for examining the evolving landscape of creative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T03:00:50Z)
• Combinatorial Creativity: A New Frontier in Generalization Abilities [14.121904952399975]
  We study the scaling behavior of creativity for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that for fixed compute budgets, there exist optimal model depths and widths for creative ability.<n>We find that the ideation-execution gap, whereby LLMs excel at generating novel scientific ideas but struggle to ensure their practical feasibility, may be explained by a fundamental novelty-utility tradeoff characteristic of creativity algorithms in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T11:48:37Z)
• Rethinking Creativity Evaluation: A Critical Analysis of Existing Creativity Evaluations [48.57816792550401]
  We examine creativity measures including the creativity index, perplexity, syntactic templates, and LLM-as-a-Judge.<n>Our analyses reveal that these metrics exhibit limited consistency, capturing different dimensions of creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T15:11:48Z)
• Probing and Inducing Combinational Creativity in Vision-Language Models [52.76981145923602]
  Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have sparked debate about whether their outputs reflect combinational creativity.<n>We propose the Identification-Explanation-Implication (IEI) framework, which decomposes creative processes into three levels.<n>To validate this framework, we curate CreativeMashup, a high-quality dataset of 666 artist-generated visual mashups annotated according to the IEI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:38:18Z)
• Creativity and Markov Decision Processes [0.20482269513546453]
  We identify formal mappings between Boden's process theory of creativity and Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) We study three out of eleven mappings in detail to understand which types of creative processes, opportunities foraberrations, and threats to creativity (uninspiration) could be observed in an MDP. We conclude by discussing quality criteria for the selection of such mappings for future work and applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T18:16:42Z)
• Divergent Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models [37.67363469600804]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to claims that they are approaching a level of creativity akin to human capabilities.<n>We leverage recent advances in computational creativity to analyze semantic divergence in both state-of-the-art LLMs and a dataset of 100,000 humans.<n>We found evidence that LLMs can surpass average human performance on the Divergent Association Task, and approach human creative writing abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T22:37:52Z)
• On the stochastics of human and artificial creativity [0.0]
  We argue that achieving human-level intelligence in computers requires also human-level creativity. We develop a statistical representation of human creativity, incorporating prior insights from theory, psychology, philosophy, neuroscience, and chaos theory. Our analysis includes modern AI algorithms such as reinforcement learning, diffusion models, and large language models, addressing to what extent they measure up to human level creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T10:38:57Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.