Behavioral Transfer in AI Agents: Evidence and Privacy Implications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19925v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 19:11:01 GMT
• Title: Behavioral Transfer in AI Agents: Evidence and Privacy Implications
• Abstract summary: We study whether AI agents systematically reflect the behavioral characteristics of their human owners.<n>We find systematic transfer between agents and their specific owners.<n>Agents with stronger behavioral transfer are more likely to disclose owner-related personal information in public discourse.
• Score: 1.108292291257035
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI agents powered by large language models are increasingly acting on behalf of humans in social and economic environments. Prior research has focused on their task performance and effects on human outcomes, but less is known about the relationship between agents and the specific individuals who deploy them. We ask whether agents systematically reflect the behavioral characteristics of their human owners, functioning as behavioral extensions rather than producing generic outputs. We study this question using 10,659 matched human-agent pairs from Moltbook, a social media platform where each autonomous agent is publicly linked to its owner's Twitter/X account. By comparing agents' posts on Moltbook with their owners' Twitter/X activity across features spanning topics, values, affect, and linguistic style, we find systematic transfer between agents and their specific owners. This transfer persists among agents without explicit configuration, and pairs that align on one behavioral dimension tend to align on others. These patterns are consistent with transfer emerging through accumulated interaction between owners (or owners' computer environments) and their agents in everyday use. We further show that agents with stronger behavioral transfer are more likely to disclose owner-related personal information in public discourse, suggesting that the same owner-specific context that drives behavioral transfer may also create privacy risk during ordinary use. Taken together, our results indicate that AI agents do not simply generate content, but reflect owner-related context in ways that can propagate human behavioral heterogeneity into digital environments, with implications for privacy, platform design, and the governance of agentic systems.

Related papers

• AgentSociety: Incentivizing Agentic Social Intelligence [0.0]
  We show that $mathttAgentSociety$ provides an environment for agents to make autonomous decisions utilizing their local context.<n>Our mechanism incentivizes agents to selectively disclose information to their neighbor agents when doing so aligns with their self-interest, so as to influence.<n>We compare and benchmark strategy profiles adopted by open and proprietary state-of-the-art language models deployed in $mathttAgentSociety$ against best response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T17:59:59Z)
• Behavioral Determinants of Deployed AI Agents in Social Networks: A Multi-Factor Study of Personality, Model, and Guardrail Specification [0.441177788642143]
  Personality specification is the dominant behavioral lever.<n>Model backbone and operational rules drive more moderate but still meaningful effects on rhetorical style and topic engagement breadth.<n>Our findings contribute empirical evidence to the emerging literature on deployed multi-agent social systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T20:28:19Z)
• AgentSocialBench: Evaluating Privacy Risks in Human-Centered Agentic Social Networks [2.291770711277359]
  Privacy in agentic social networks is fundamentally harder than in single-agent settings.<n>cross-domain and cross-user coordination creates persistent leakage pressure.<n>Privacy instructions that teach agents how to abstract sensitive information paradoxically cause them to discuss it more.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T23:43:23Z)
• Behind the Prompt: The Agent-User Problem in Information Retrieval [4.563318916484434]
  User models in information retrieval rest on a foundational assumption that observed behavior reveals intent.<n>For any action an agent takes, a hidden instruction could have produced identical output - making intent non-identifiable at the individual level.<n>We investigate the agent-user problem through a large-scale corpus from an agent-native social platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T01:42:14Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• Spontaneous Emergence of Agent Individuality through Social Interactions in LLM-Based Communities [0.0]
  We study the emergence of agency from scratch by using Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents. By analyzing this multi-agent simulation, we report valuable new insights into how social norms, cooperation, and personality traits can emerge spontaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T16:49:33Z)
• Knowledge Boundary and Persona Dynamic Shape A Better Social Media Agent [69.12885360755408]
  We construct a social media agent based on personalized knowledge and dynamic persona information. For personalized knowledge, we add external knowledge sources and match them with the persona information of agents, thereby giving the agent personalized world knowledge. For dynamic persona information, we use current action information to internally retrieve the persona information of the agent, thereby reducing the interference of diverse persona information on the current action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T10:01:23Z)
• AgentCF: Collaborative Learning with Autonomous Language Agents for Recommender Systems [112.76941157194544]
  We propose AgentCF for simulating user-item interactions in recommender systems through agent-based collaborative filtering. We creatively consider not only users but also items as agents, and develop a collaborative learning approach that optimize both kinds of agents together. Overall, the optimized agents exhibit diverse interaction behaviors within our framework, including user-item, user-user, item-item, and collective interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T16:37:14Z)
• Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior [86.1026716646289]
  We introduce generative agents--computational software agents that simulate believable human behavior. We describe an architecture that extends a large language model to store a complete record of the agent's experiences. We instantiate generative agents to populate an interactive sandbox environment inspired by The Sims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T01:55:19Z)
• Diversifying Agent's Behaviors in Interactive Decision Models [11.125175635860169]
  Modelling other agents' behaviors plays an important role in decision models for interactions among multiple agents. In this article, we investigate into diversifying behaviors of other agents in the subject agent's decision model prior to their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T23:05:00Z)
• Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interaction [65.44092264843538]
  We propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for learning latent representations of an agent's policy. We show that our approach outperforms the alternatives and learns to influence the other agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T19:04:26Z)
• Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents [73.03133692589532]
  We show how to equip RL agents with the ability to give rewards directly to other agents, using a learned incentive function. Such agents significantly outperform standard RL and opponent-shaping agents in challenging general-sum Markov games. Our work points toward more opportunities and challenges along the path to ensure the common good in a multi-agent future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:12:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.