From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20006v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:31:01 GMT
• Title: From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents
• Abstract summary: We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations.<n>The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending.<n>Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA) is a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory.
• Score: 38.52713500119118
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Personalized agents that interact with users over long periods must maintain persistent memory across sessions and update it as circumstances change. However, existing benchmarks predominantly frame long-term memory evaluation as fact retrieval from past conversations, providing limited insight into agents' ability to consolidate memory over time or handle frequent knowledge updates. We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations. The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending. To ensure data quality, we employ automated memory-grounding checks and human evaluation. We further introduce Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA), a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory when evaluating long-term memory. Evaluations of four LLMs and six memory agents reveal frequent reuse of invalid memories and failures to reconcile evolving memories. Memory agents offer marginal improvements, exposing shortcomings in long-term memory for personalized agents.

Related papers

• From Passive Retrieval to Active Memory Navigation: Learning to Use Memory as a Structured Action Space [27.456426188493094]
  NapMem organizes user history into a linked multi-granularity memory pyramid.<n>Agent is trained to select memory according to the query and intermediate evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T03:47:12Z)
• MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory [32.49512092540906]
  MemSyco-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems.<n>MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T15:30:33Z)
• MEMPROBE: Probing Long-Term Agent Memory via Hidden User-State Recovery [58.64329475683699]
  We argue that long-term memory should be evaluated as an auditable post-interaction artifact.<n>We instantiate this view in MEMPROBE, a benchmark in which a memory-equipped agent assists simulated users.<n>We find that successful assistance and recoverable memory behave as distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T13:52:46Z)
• WorldMemArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agent Memory Through Action-World Interaction [72.1620416874118]
  Multimodal large language models are increasingly deployed as long-horizon agents.<n>Existing benchmarks measure recall over static dialogue, collapse memory into a single end-of-task accuracy, and reduce visual observations to captions.<n>We formulate multimodal agent memory as an Action-World Interaction Loop with an observable four-stage lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T04:27:20Z)
• MemGuard: Preventing Memory Contamination in Long-Term Memory-Augmented Large Language Models [56.31411457917676]
  We introduce MemGuard, a type-aware memory framework that preserves functional memory boundaries during memory construction and retrieval.<n>Across hallucination and long-horizon conversation benchmarks, MemGuard improves memory reliability by up to 28.27% while retrieving up to 5.8x fewer memory tokens than prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T06:04:19Z)
• Personalize-then-Store: Benchmarking and Learning Personalized Memory for Long-horizon Agents [20.22872890297194]
  Existing large language model (LLM) based memory systems apply universal, static policies that overlook a fundamental reality: the contexts that are worth storing in memory are different across users.<n>We introduce PerMemBench, the first benchmark for evaluating personalized memory systems.<n>We propose session level storage gating, a lightweight framework that selectively bypasses memory operations for transient sessions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T07:48:33Z)
• AdaMem: Adaptive User-Centric Memory for Long-Horizon Dialogue Agents [49.63422082885992]
  We propose AdaMem, an adaptive user-centric memory framework for long-horizon dialogue agents.<n>AdaMem organizes dialogue history into working, episodic, persona, and graph memories.<n>We evaluate AdaMem on the LoCoMo and PERSONAMEM benchmarks for long-horizon reasoning and user modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T13:22:54Z)
• According to Me: Long-Term Personalized Referential Memory QA [27.402232752643275]
  ATM-Bench is the first benchmark for multimodal, multi-source personalized referential Memory QA.<n>Guided Memory (SGM) structurally represents memory items originated from different sources.<n>We find poor performance (under 20% accuracy) on the ATM-Bench-Hard set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T15:42:29Z)
• MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks [55.145729491377374]
  Existing evaluations of agents with memory typically assess memorization and action in isolation.<n>We introduce MemoryArena, a unified evaluation gym for benchmarking agent memory in multi-session Memory-Agent-Environment loops.<n> MemoryArena supports evaluation across web navigation, preference-constrained planning, progressive information search, and sequential formal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T09:49:14Z)
• OP-Bench: Benchmarking Over-Personalization for Memory-Augmented Personalized Conversational Agents [55.27061195244624]
  We formalize over-personalization into three types: Irrelevance, Repetition, and Sycophancy.<n>Agents tend to retrieve and over-attend to user memories even when unnecessary.<n>Our work takes an initial step toward more controllable and appropriate personalization in memory-augmented dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T08:27:13Z)
• Evaluating Long-Term Memory for Long-Context Question Answering [100.1267054069757]
  We present a systematic evaluation of memory-augmented methods using LoCoMo, a benchmark of synthetic long-context dialogues annotated for question-answering tasks.<n>Our findings show that memory-augmented approaches reduce token usage by over 90% while maintaining competitive accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T18:03:50Z)
• Multiple Memory Systems for Enhancing the Long-term Memory of Agent [9.43633399280987]
  Existing methods, such as MemoryBank and A-MEM, have poor quality of stored memory content.<n>We have designed a multiple memory system inspired by cognitive psychology theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T06:29:42Z)
• LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory [68.97819665784442]
  We introduce LongMemEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate five core long-term memory abilities of chat assistants.<n>LongMemEval presents a significant challenge to existing long-term memory systems.<n>We present a unified framework that breaks down the long-term memory design into three stages: indexing, retrieval, and reading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:59:44Z)
• Evaluating Long-Term Memory in 3D Mazes [10.224858246626171]
  Memory Maze is a 3D domain of randomized mazes designed for evaluating long-term memory in agents. Unlike existing benchmarks, Memory Maze measures long-term memory separate from confounding agent abilities. We find that current algorithms benefit from training with truncated backpropagation through time and succeed on small mazes, but fall short of human performance on the large mazes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T16:32:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.