MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01071v2
• Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:40:30 GMT
• Title: MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory
• Abstract summary: MemSyco-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems.<n>MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used.
• Score: 32.49512092540906
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning. Despite this emerging risk, existing memory benchmarks primarily evaluate whether memories are correctly stored, retrieved, or updated, while overlooking how retrieved memories influence downstream reasoning and decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose MemSyco-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating memory-induced sycophancy in agent systems. MemSyco-Bench measures when memory should influence a decision and how valid memory should be used. Specifically, it covers five tasks that assess whether agents can reject memory as factual evidence, respect its applicable scope, resolve conflicts between memory and objective evidence, track memory updates, and use valid memory for personalization. All related resources are collected for the community at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/MemSyco-Bench.

Related papers

• Harness the Memory: A Holistic Evaluation of Memory Substrates in Memory Agents [97.19033877543522]
  We present a controlled harness evaluation of memory substrates for memory-augmented agents.<n>We instrument 26 performance and efficiency metrics under a unified harness.<n>These findings motivate substrate routing as a necessary component of adaptive agent memory systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-15T03:29:48Z)
• Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents [72.3752981234916]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks.<n>We present Memory as a Controlled Process (MemCon), a framework that models memory operations as a Markov Decision Process.<n>MemCon consistently outperforms multiple memory baselines by up to 15.2 points in task success while reducing token consumption by 5-20%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T08:32:40Z)
• MEMPROBE: Probing Long-Term Agent Memory via Hidden User-State Recovery [58.64329475683699]
  We argue that long-term memory should be evaluated as an auditable post-interaction artifact.<n>We instantiate this view in MEMPROBE, a benchmark in which a memory-equipped agent assists simulated users.<n>We find that successful assistance and recoverable memory behave as distinct capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T13:52:46Z)
• Beyond Similarity: Trustworthy Memory Search for Personal AI Agents [25.265839311088516]
  We study memory search as a trust boundary in personal AI agents.<n>MemGate is a lightweight and deployable memory plug-in for trustworthy memory search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T11:54:29Z)
• MemGuard: Preventing Memory Contamination in Long-Term Memory-Augmented Large Language Models [56.31411457917676]
  We introduce MemGuard, a type-aware memory framework that preserves functional memory boundaries during memory construction and retrieval.<n>Across hallucination and long-horizon conversation benchmarks, MemGuard improves memory reliability by up to 28.27% while retrieving up to 5.8x fewer memory tokens than prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T06:04:19Z)
• EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective [21.66000179149483]
  EvoMemBench is a unified benchmark organized along two axes: memory scope and memory content.<n>We compare 15 representative memory methods with strong long-context baselines under a standardized protocol.<n>Results show that current memory systems are still far from a general solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T13:54:38Z)
• Causal Intervention-Based Memory Selection for Long-Horizon LLM Agents [0.33842793760651557]
  We propose a causal memory-selection technique that estimates how candidate memories affect the model's answer under controlled interventions.<n>Results show that CMI achieves a stronger balance between answer quality and robustness to misleading memory, suggesting that reliable long-term memory requires selecting context based on causal usefulness rather than relevance alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T20:21:55Z)
• From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents [38.52713500119118]
  We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations.<n>The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending.<n>Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA) is a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T21:31:01Z)
• MemEvoBench: Benchmarking Memory MisEvolution in LLM Agents [78.95081012334116]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) with persistent memory enhances interaction continuity and personalization but introduces new safety risks.<n> contaminated or biased memory accumulation can trigger abnormal agent behaviors.<n>MemeEvoBench is the first benchmark evaluating memory safety in LLM agents against adversarial memory injection, noisy tool outputs, and biased feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T07:29:52Z)
• RMBench: Memory-Dependent Robotic Manipulation Benchmark with Insights into Policy Design [77.30163153176954]
  RMBench is a simulation benchmark comprising 9 manipulation tasks that span multiple levels of memory complexity.<n>Mem-0 is a modular manipulation policy with explicit memory components designed to support controlled ablation studies.<n>We identify memory-related limitations in existing policies and provide empirical insights into how architectural design choices influence memory performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T18:59:59Z)
• MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks [55.145729491377374]
  Existing evaluations of agents with memory typically assess memorization and action in isolation.<n>We introduce MemoryArena, a unified evaluation gym for benchmarking agent memory in multi-session Memory-Agent-Environment loops.<n> MemoryArena supports evaluation across web navigation, preference-constrained planning, progressive information search, and sequential formal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T09:49:14Z)
• MetaMem: Evolving Meta-Memory for Knowledge Utilization through Self-Reflective Symbolic Optimization [57.17751568928966]
  We propose MetaMem, a framework that augments memory systems with a self-evolving meta-memory.<n>During meta-memory optimization, MetaMem iteratively distills transferable knowledge utilization experiences across different tasks.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of MetaMem, which significantly outperforms strong baselines by over 3.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T04:46:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.