Investigation of cardinality classification for bacterial colony counting using explainable artificial intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20026v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:11:20 GMT
- Title: Investigation of cardinality classification for bacterial colony counting using explainable artificial intelligence
- Abstract summary: MicrobiaNet is the best-performing cardinality classification model for colony counting.<n>We show that high visual similarity across classes is the key issue hindering further performance improvement.
- Score: 2.578548162794322
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Automatic bacterial colony counting is a highly sought-after technology in modern biological laboratories because it eliminates manual counting effort. Previous work has observed that MicrobiaNet, currently the best-performing cardinality classification model for colony counting, has difficulty distinguishing colonies of three or more individuals. However, it is unclear if this is due to properties of the data together with inherent characteristics of the MicrobiaNet model. By analysing MicrobiaNet with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), we demonstrate that XAI can provide insights into how data properties constrain cardinality classification performance in colony counting. Our results show that high visual similarity across classes is the key issue hindering further performance improvement, revising prior assertions about MicrobiaNet. These findings suggest future work should focus on models that explicitly incorporate visual similarity or explore density estimation approaches, with broader implications for neural network classifiers trained on imbalanced datasets.
Related papers
- Colony Grounded SAM2: Zero-shot detection and segmentation of bacterial colonies using foundation models [0.0]
We propose a zero-shot inference pipeline to detect and segment bacterial colonies in multiple settings without any further training.<n>By utilizing the pre-trained foundation models Grounding DINO and Segment Anything Model 2, we developed a model that is robust to data changes.<n>Results showed a mean Average Precision of 93.1% and a $Dice@detection score of 0.85, showing excellent detection and segmentation capabilities on out-of-distribution datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T09:46:17Z) - Masked Autoencoders for Microscopy are Scalable Learners of Cellular Biology [2.7280901660033643]
This work explores the scaling properties of weakly supervised classifiers and self-supervised masked autoencoders (MAEs)
Our results show that ViT-based MAEs outperform weakly supervised classifiers on a variety of tasks, achieving as much as a 11.5% relative improvement when recalling known biological relationships curated from public databases.
We develop a new channel-agnostic MAE architecture (CA-MAE) that allows for inputting images of different numbers and orders of channels at inference time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T02:42:06Z) - Application of data engineering approaches to address challenges in
microbiome data for optimal medical decision-making [0.0]
The study addresses the issues inherent to microbiome datasets and could be highly beneficial for providing personalized medicine.
The prototype employed in the study addresses the issues inherent to microbiome datasets and could be highly beneficial for providing personalized medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-30T05:36:39Z) - Optimizations of Autoencoders for Analysis and Classification of
Microscopic In Situ Hybridization Images [68.8204255655161]
We propose a deep-learning framework to detect and classify areas of microscopic images with similar levels of gene expression.
The data we analyze requires an unsupervised learning model for which we employ a type of Artificial Neural Network - Deep Learning Autoencoders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T13:45:28Z) - CausalBench: A Large-scale Benchmark for Network Inference from
Single-cell Perturbation Data [61.088705993848606]
We introduce CausalBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating causal inference methods on real-world interventional data.
CaulBench incorporates biologically-motivated performance metrics, including new distribution-based interventional metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T13:04:07Z) - Digital Fingerprinting of Microstructures [44.139970905896504]
Finding efficient means of fingerprinting microstructural information is a critical step towards harnessing data-centric machine learning approaches.
Here, we consider microstructure classification and utilise the resulting features over a range of related machine learning tasks.
In particular, methods that leverage transfer learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), pretrained on the ImageNet dataset, are generally shown to outperform other methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-25T15:40:44Z) - Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process.
Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting.
We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z) - Deep neural networks approach to microbial colony detection -- a
comparative analysis [52.77024349608834]
This study investigates the performance of three deep learning approaches for object detection on the AGAR dataset.
The achieved results may serve as a benchmark for future experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-23T12:06:00Z) - On the Efficacy of Adversarial Data Collection for Question Answering:
Results from a Large-Scale Randomized Study [65.17429512679695]
In adversarial data collection (ADC), a human workforce interacts with a model in real time, attempting to produce examples that elicit incorrect predictions.
Despite ADC's intuitive appeal, it remains unclear when training on adversarial datasets produces more robust models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T00:48:33Z) - Automatic Cell Counting in Flourescent Microscopy Using Deep Learning [0.0]
We propose a Machine Learning approach that exploits a fully-convolutional network in a binary segmentation fashion to localize objects of interest.
Counts are then retrieved as the number of detected items.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-24T23:04:47Z) - Towards an Automatic Analysis of CHO-K1 Suspension Growth in
Microfluidic Single-cell Cultivation [63.94623495501023]
We propose a novel Machine Learning architecture, which allows us to infuse a neural deep network with human-powered abstraction on the level of data.
Specifically, we train a generative model simultaneously on natural and synthetic data, so that it learns a shared representation, from which a target variable, such as the cell count, can be reliably estimated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T08:36:51Z) - A Trainable Optimal Transport Embedding for Feature Aggregation and its
Relationship to Attention [96.77554122595578]
We introduce a parametrized representation of fixed size, which embeds and then aggregates elements from a given input set according to the optimal transport plan between the set and a trainable reference.
Our approach scales to large datasets and allows end-to-end training of the reference, while also providing a simple unsupervised learning mechanism with small computational cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T08:35:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.