Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20062v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 23:51:00 GMT
- Title: Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure
- Abstract summary: The rise of IoT devices and the uptake of cloud computing have informed a new era of data-driven intelligence.<n>Traditional centralized machine learning models that require a large volume of data to be stored in a single location have become more susceptible to data breaches, privacy violations, and regulatory non-compliance.<n>This report presents a thorough examination of the merging of Federated Learning (FL) and blockchain technology in a cloud-edge setting.
- Score: 0.0695155813793092
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The rise of IoT devices and the uptake of cloud computing have informed a new era of data-driven intelligence. Traditional centralized machine learning models that require a large volume of data to be stored in a single location have therefore become more susceptible to data breaches, privacy violations, and regulatory non-compliance. This report presents a thorough examination of the merging of Federated Learning (FL) and blockchain technology in a cloud-edge setting, demonstrating it as an effective solution to the stated concerns. We are proposing a detailed four-dimensional architectural categorization that meticulously assesses coordination frameworks, consensus algorithms, data storage practices, and trust models that are significant to these integrated systems. The manuscript presents a comprehensive comparative examination of two cutting-edge frameworks: the Multi-Objectives Reinforcement Federated Learning Blockchain (MORFLB), which is designed for intelligent transportation systems, and the Federated Blockchain-IoT Framework for Sustainable Healthcare Systems (FBCI-SHS), elucidating their distinctive contributions and inherent limitations. Lastly, we engage in a thorough evaluation of the literature that integrates a comparative perspective on current frameworks to discern the singular nature of this research within existing knowledge systems. The manuscript culminates in delineating the principal challenges and offering a strategic framework for prospective research trajectories, emphasizing the advancement of adaptive, resilient, and standardized BCFL systems across diverse application domains.
Related papers
- A Survey on Generative Recommendation: Data, Model, and Tasks [55.36322811257545]
generative recommendation reconceptualizes recommendation as a generation task rather than discriminative scoring.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive examination through a unified tripartite framework spanning data, model, and task dimensions.<n>We identify five key advantages: world knowledge integration, natural language understanding, reasoning capabilities, scaling laws, and creative generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T04:02:58Z) - A Survey on Cloud-Edge-Terminal Collaborative Intelligence in AIoT Networks [49.90474228895655]
Cloud-edge-terminal collaborative intelligence (CETCI) is a fundamental paradigm within the artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) community.<n>CETCI has made significant progress with emerging AIoT applications, moving beyond isolated layer optimization to deployable collaborative intelligence systems.<n>This survey describes foundational architectures, enabling technologies, and scenarios of CETCI paradigms, offering a tutorial-style review for CISAIOT beginners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T08:38:01Z) - Blockchain-Enabled Federated Learning [15.579343834528231]
BCFL addresses challenges of trust, privacy, and coordination in AI systems.<n>This chapter provides comprehensive architectural analysis of BCFL systems.<n>We analyze design patterns from blockchain-verified centralized coordination to fully decentralized peer-to-peer networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T15:47:55Z) - Secure and Scalable Blockchain Voting: A Comparative Framework and the Role of Large Language Models [0.0]
This paper presents a comparative framework for analyzing blockchain-based E-Voting architectures, consensus mechanisms, and cryptographic protocols.<n>We propose optimization strategies that include hybrid consensus, lightweight cryptography, and decentralized identity management.<n>Our findings offer a foundation for designing secure, scalable, and intelligent blockchain-based E-Voting systems suitable for national-scale deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T21:34:21Z) - Does Machine Unlearning Truly Remove Knowledge? [80.83986295685128]
We introduce a comprehensive auditing framework for unlearning evaluation comprising three benchmark datasets, six unlearning algorithms, and five prompt-based auditing methods.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of different unlearning strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T09:19:07Z) - Federated Learning-Enhanced Blockchain Framework for Privacy-Preserving Intrusion Detection in Industrial IoT [0.0]
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) systems have become integral to smart manufacturing, yet their growing connectivity has exposed them to significant cybersecurity threats.<n>Traditional intrusion detection systems (IDS) often rely on centralized architectures that raise concerns over data privacy, latency, and single points of failure.<n>We propose a novel Federated Learning-Enhanced Framework (FL-BCID) for privacy-preserving intrusion detection tailored for IIoT environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T11:11:44Z) - Federated Learning: A Survey on Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Intelligence [0.0]
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a transformative paradigm in the field of distributed machine learning.<n>This survey provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of Federated Learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-24T16:10:29Z) - Swarm Learning: A Survey of Concepts, Applications, and Trends [3.55026004901472]
Deep learning models have raised privacy and security concerns due to their reliance on large datasets on central servers.<n>Federated learning (FL) has introduced a novel approach to building a versatile, large-scale machine learning framework.<n>Swarm learning (SL) has been proposed in collaboration with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)<n>SL represents a decentralized machine learning framework that leverages blockchain technology for secure, scalable, and private data management.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T14:59:24Z) - Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities.
Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy.
This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z) - Exploring Federated Unlearning: Review, Comparison, and Insights [101.64910079905566]
federated unlearning enables the selective removal of data from models trained in federated systems.<n>This paper examines existing federated unlearning approaches, examining their algorithmic efficiency, impact on model accuracy, and effectiveness in preserving privacy.<n>We propose the OpenFederatedUnlearning framework, a unified benchmark for evaluating federated unlearning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T01:34:33Z) - RoFL: Attestable Robustness for Secure Federated Learning [59.63865074749391]
Federated Learning allows a large number of clients to train a joint model without the need to share their private data.
To ensure the confidentiality of the client updates, Federated Learning systems employ secure aggregation.
We present RoFL, a secure Federated Learning system that improves robustness against malicious clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T15:42:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.