Votiverse: A Configurable Governance Platform for Democratic Decision-Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20863v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 21:38:08 GMT
• Title: Votiverse: A Configurable Governance Platform for Democratic Decision-Making
• Abstract summary: Votiverse is a platform for exploring the rest of democracy's possible configurations.<n>It provides organizations, communities, and institutions of any size with a governance engine.<n>This paper formalizes the governance model, situates it within existing work on liquid democracy and participatory decision-making, addresses known failure modes, and describes the architecture of the platform.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Democracy is not a single mechanism. It is a space of possible configurations -- a spectrum stretching from pure direct participation to full delegation of authority. The systems we live under today occupy a narrow band of that spectrum, chosen centuries ago under constraints that no longer apply, and rarely questioned since. Votiverse is a platform for exploring the rest of that space. It provides organizations, communities, and institutions of any size with a configurable governance engine. Participants can vote directly, delegate their vote to trusted individuals by topic, or operate under any hybrid arrangement their group defines. Delegations are revocable, topic-specific, and transitive. A direct vote always overrides a delegation. In this model, traditional representative democracy is not the norm -- it is an edge case: the configuration you get when delegation is forced, universal, non-specific, and irrevocable for a fixed term. Votiverse introduces two structural innovations. First, a governance awareness layer -- a built-in system that monitors the delegation network and delivers contextual, progressive-disclosure reporting to participants at the point of decision. Second, a prediction-tracking accountability layer. Proposals carry falsifiable predictions. Outcomes are recorded. Over time, the platform builds a collective memory of what was decided, what was promised, and what actually happened. Together, these layers transform voting from a momentary act into an ongoing process of collective learning. This paper formalizes the governance model, situates it within existing work on liquid democracy and participatory decision-making, addresses known failure modes, and describes the architecture of the platform. The core platform has been implemented and released as open-source software.

Related papers

• Endorsement Without New Evidence: How Sequential Voting Inflates Mandates in Online Community Governance [4.327699139300453]
  We introduce vote-text divergence, a measure that flags a decisive vote paired with a thin, deferential rationale.<n> Divergence rises as voters arrive later, even after controlling for voter and election fixed effects.<n>The effect is strongest among peripheral voters in the co-voting network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T18:06:15Z)
• Seeing Is Not Deciding: Can Multimodal LLMs Act as Effective CEOs? [53.05042283845008]
  We introduce C-SUITEBENCH, a controlled multimodal benchmark for executive business decisions.<n>We place nine models in the role of a chief executive officer and evaluate their decision-making ability.<n>We uncover a multimodal integration paradox: adding visual business information degrades constrained resource allocation for all nine models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T10:43:33Z)
• Resilient Liquid Democracy: Mitigating Voting Power Imbalances via Secure Delegation Networks [0.0]
  Liquid democracy promises to improve collective decision-making by allowing voters to vote directly, delegate their voting power to trusted participants, or combine both approaches through fallback mechanisms.<n>Existing deployments typically rely on transparent delegation, which exposes voters to popularity-driven herding, makes coercion verifiable, and introduces systemic fragility when highly-backed delegates abstain.<n>We propose a secure liquid democracy mechanism that resolves the tension between informed expertise routing and systemic fragility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T05:38:46Z)
• When Agents Evolve, Institutions Follow [52.359340707289114]
  We argue that multi-agent systems built on large language models face the same challenge.<n>Their central problem is not only individual intelligence, but collective organization.<n>We translate seven historical political institutions, spanning four canonical governance patterns, into executable multi-agent architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T10:30:58Z)
• Learning Resilient Elections with Adversarial GNNs [7.860518501342454]
  We generalise the expressive capability of learned voting rules, and combine improvements in neural network architecture with adversarial training to improve the resilience of voting rules.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T20:12:14Z)
• Knowledge representation and scalable abstract reasoning for simulated democracy in Unity [44.99833362998488]
  We present a novel form of scalable knowledge representation about agents in a simulated democracy, e-polis.<n>Real users respond to social challenges associated with democratic institutions.<n>At the end of the game players vote on the Smart City that results from their collective choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T21:03:02Z)
• Kite: How to Delegate Voting Power Privately [11.967243519550625]
  We introduce Kite, a protocol that enables $textitprivate$ delegation of voting power for members.<n>Voters can freely delegate, proofs, and re-delegate their power without revealing any information about who they delegated to.<n>The only information that is recorded publicly is that the voter delegated or re-delegated their vote to someone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T23:49:45Z)
• Optimal bounds for dissatisfaction in perpetual voting [84.02572742131521]
  We consider a perpetual approval voting method that guarantees that no voter is dissatisfied too many times.<n>We identify a sufficient condition on voter behavior under which a sublinear growth of dissatisfaction is possible.<n>We present a voting method with sublinear guarantees on dissatisfaction under bounded conflicts, based on the standard techniques from prediction with expert advice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T19:58:55Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Drive Anywhere: Generalizable End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Multi-modal Foundation Models [114.69732301904419]
  We present an approach to apply end-to-end open-set (any environment/scene) autonomous driving that is capable of providing driving decisions from representations queryable by image and text. Our approach demonstrates unparalleled results in diverse tests while achieving significantly greater robustness in out-of-distribution situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:56:35Z)
• As Time Goes By: Adding a Temporal Dimension Towards Resolving Delegations in Liquid Democracy [16.219158909792256]
  Our work takes a first step to integrate a time horizon into decision-making problems in Liquid Democracy systems. Our approach, via a computational complexity analysis, exploits concepts and tools from temporal graph theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T15:46:45Z)
• Explainable Abuse Detection as Intent Classification and Slot Filling [66.80201541759409]
  We introduce the concept of policy-aware abuse detection, abandoning the unrealistic expectation that systems can reliably learn which phenomena constitute abuse from inspecting the data alone. We show how architectures for intent classification and slot filling can be used for abuse detection, while providing a rationale for model decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T03:33:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.