Firstborn Advantage in the Ivory Tower: Mass Science, Expanding Scholarly Families, and the Reshaping of Academic Stratification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20864v2
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:57:35 GMT
• Title: Firstborn Advantage in the Ivory Tower: Mass Science, Expanding Scholarly Families, and the Reshaping of Academic Stratification
• Abstract summary: We propose a new framework that integrates concepts and methodological tools from demography into the social study of science.<n>By introducing a demographic framework into the study of science, this paper offers a new perspective on scientific stratification.
• Score: 3.3390650922528184
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the mechanisms underlying scientific stratification in the era of transition from elite to mass science. Existing scholarship has largely examined scientific stratification through the Matthew effect framework at the individual, institutional, and lineage levels, but this theoretical lens has grown limited in today's academic landscape, where mass, team-based, and lab-centered research has become the dominant mode of knowledge production. As scientists increasingly share institutional and lineage backgrounds, considerable variation within these units remains unexplained. We propose a new framework that integrates concepts and methodological tools from demography into the social study of science. Drawing on the parallel between biological families and scholarly lineages as fundamental units of reproduction, we adapt the concept of birth order to examine how the sequence of doctoral students within a lineage shapes their career trajectories. Using data on more than one million U.S. doctoral graduates, our analysis shows that, much like in biological families, later students systematically perform worse than earlier ones across multiple dimensions of academic achievement, both short and long term. Examining the underlying mechanisms, we find that later students receive less cognitive stimulation from mature scholars and instead more from peers, and specialize in narrower intellectual domains as senior siblings occupy adjacent territories. These factors constrain their intellectual development as independent scholars. By introducing a demographic framework into the study of science, this paper offers a new perspective on scientific stratification and demonstrates how demographic concepts can be fruitfully extended to analyze broader social and epistemic systems.

Related papers

• SCALE: Scientific Concept Aggregation via LLMs and Embeddings for Fine-Grained Taxonomy Extension [0.815557531820863]
  Author keywords offer greater specificity, but their fragmentation, redundancy, and terminological variability limit their use as stable units of knowledge organization.<n>We introduce SCALE, a framework that extends the OpenAlex taxonomy with a new level of scientific Concepts below Topics.<n>The resulting taxonomy enables scientific literature to be read through an intermediate conceptual level between broad research topics and individual documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T14:12:15Z)
• Towards a new paradigm of scientific discovery with socialized artificial intelligence [48.48034861871986]
  We introduce Bridging Literature, Agents, and Zero-gap Experimentation (BLAZE), a paradigm of socialized scientific intelligence.<n>BLAZE conceives AI not as an assistant for isolated research tasks, but as an organizational infrastructure for scientific discovery.<n>Its purpose is not to replace human discovery, but to extend the scale, depth, and continuity of collective scientific inquiry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T18:18:39Z)
• SciAtlas: A Large-Scale Knowledge Graph for Automated Scientific Research [64.97707567378497]
  We introduce SciAtlas, a large-scale, multi-disciplinary, heterogeneous academic resource knowledge graph.<n>By integrating over 43M papers from 26 disciplines, and a total of 157M entities and 3B triplets, SciAtlas provides a structured topological cognitive substrate.<n>We develop a neuro-symbolic retrieval algorithm featuring tri-path collaborative recall and graph reranking, achieving a seamless transition from simple semantic matching to deterministic association discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T16:03:29Z)
• Embodied Science: Closing the Discovery Loop with Agentic Embodied AI [73.54118756665221]
  We argue for embodied science, a paradigm that reframes scientific discovery as a closed loop tightly coupling agentic reasoning with physical execution.<n>We propose a unified Perception-Language-Action-Discovery (PLAD) framework, wherein embodied agents perceive experimental environments, reason over scientific knowledge, execute physical interventions, and internalize outcomes to drive subsequent exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T09:20:12Z)
• BABE: Biology Arena BEnchmark [51.53220868983288]
  BABE is a benchmark designed to evaluate the experimental reasoning capabilities of biological AI systems.<n>Our benchmark provides a robust framework for assessing how well AI systems can reason like practicing scientists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T16:39:20Z)
• A Brain-like Synergistic Core in LLMs Drives Behaviour and Learning [50.68188138112555]
  We show that large language models spontaneously develop synergistic cores.<n>We find that areas in middle layers exhibit synergistic processing while early and late layers rely on redundancy.<n>This convergence suggests that synergistic information processing is a fundamental property of intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T10:48:35Z)
• Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physics [82.55776608452017]
  Large language models (LLMs) provide a flexible and versatile framework that orchestrates interactions with human scientists, natural language, computer language and code, and physics.<n>This paper presents our view and vision of LLM-based scientific agents and their growing role in transforming the scientific discovery lifecycle.<n>We identify open research challenges and outline promising directions for building more robust, generalizable, and adaptive scientific agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T22:26:26Z)
• Persistence Paradox in Dynamic Science [4.641069902222306]
  We focus on the deep learning revolution catalyzed by AlexNet in 2012.<n>Analyzing the 20-year career trajectories of over 5,000 scientists, we examine how their research focus and output evolved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-28T02:21:19Z)
• Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists [72.3420699173245]
  An autonomous generalist scientist (AGS) concept combines agentic AI and embodied robotics to automate the entire research lifecycle.<n>AGS aims to significantly reduce the time and resources needed for scientific discovery.<n>As these autonomous systems become increasingly integrated into the research process, we hypothesize that scientific discovery might adhere to new scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T14:00:27Z)
• Bridging the Early Science Gap with Artificial Intelligence: Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools for Early Childhood Science Education [0.0]
  Early childhood science education is crucial for developing scientific literacy.<n> translating complex scientific concepts into age-appropriate content remains challenging for educators.<n>Our study evaluates four leading Large Language Models (LLMs) on their ability to generate preschool-appropriate scientific explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T10:55:41Z)
• Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domains [47.97810890521825]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative power in enhancing natural language comprehension. The application of LLMs extends beyond conventional linguistic boundaries, encompassing specialized linguistic systems developed within various scientific disciplines. As a burgeoning area in the community of AI for Science, scientific LLMs warrant comprehensive exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T05:33:34Z)
• Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field [0.0]
  We discuss issues at the intersection of developmental biology, computer science, and robotics. In the context of biological robots, we explore changes across concepts and previously distinct fields. We hope new fields can emerge as boundaries arising from technological limitations are overcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T17:06:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.