Learning AI Without a STEM Background: Mixed-Methods Evidence from a Diverse, Mixed-Cohort AIED Program

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20870v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 01:29:36 GMT
• Title: Learning AI Without a STEM Background: Mixed-Methods Evidence from a Diverse, Mixed-Cohort AIED Program
• Abstract summary: This paper presents and evaluates an NSF-funded, innovative mixed-cohort AI education model.<n>We examine learners' academic agency, confidence navigating AI concepts, and perceived expansion of career trajectories.<n>Our findings suggest that human-centered instructional supports, such as ethical scaffolding, mentorship, and structured discussion, are essential components of equitable AI education.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite growing interest in AI education, most AIED initiatives remain narrowly targeted toward STEM-prepared students, limiting participation by non-STEM learners and adults seeking to engage with AI in public-interest, policy, or workforce contexts. This paper presents and evaluates an NSF-funded, innovative mixed-cohort AI education model that intentionally integrates non-STEM undergraduates and adult learners into a shared learning environment centered on ethical reasoning, socio-technical judgment, and applied AI literacy rather than technical proficiency alone. Drawing on mixed-methods data from course surveys, open-ended reflections, and educator reports, we examine learners' academic agency, confidence navigating AI concepts, critical engagement with ethical tradeoffs, and perceived expansion of postsecondary and career trajectories. Quantitative results indicate significant gains in confidence and perceived relevance of AI across cohorts' participants, while qualitative analyses reveal a consistent emphasis on responsibility, judgment, and contextual reasoning over technical mastery. Instructors and near-peer mentors corroborated high levels of engagement and productive challenge, particularly in dialogic and scenario-based learning activities. Our findings suggest that human-centered instructional supports, such as ethical scaffolding, mentorship, and structured discussion, are essential components of equitable AI education, especially in heterogeneous and non-traditional learner populations. We argue that ethical judgment should be treated as a core learning outcome in AIED alongside AI literacy, and we offer design implications for expanding access to AI education in policy-relevant and workforce-adjacent contexts.

Related papers

• Rethinking AI Evaluation in Education: The TEACH-AI Framework and Benchmark for Generative AI Assistants [8.591535882390918]
  TEACH-AI is a domain-independent, pedagogically grounded, and stakeholder-aligned framework for guiding the design, development, and evaluation of generative AI systems in education.<n>Our work invites the community to reconsider what constructs "effective" AI in education and to design model evaluation approaches that promote co-creation, inclusivity, and long-term human, social, and educational impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T17:42:36Z)
• AI Literacy for Community Colleges: Instructors' Perspectives on Scenario-Based and Interactive Approaches to Teaching AI [0.500208619516796]
  This research category full paper investigates how community college instructors evaluate interactive, no-code AI literacy resources designed for non-STEM learners.<n>As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into everyday technologies, AI literacy has emerged as a critical skill across disciplines.<n>We developed AI User, an interactive online curriculum that introduces core AI concepts through scenario - based activities set in real - world contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T15:51:53Z)
• Integration of AI in STEM Education, Addressing Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings [0.0]
  The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence into K-12 STEM education presents transformative opportunities alongside significant ethical challenges.<n>This paper examines the dual-edged impact of AI in STEM classrooms, analyzing its benefits (e.g., adaptive learning, real-time feedback) and drawbacks (e.g., surveillance risks, pedagogical limitations) through an ethical lens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T03:07:26Z)
• Methodological Foundations for AI-Driven Survey Question Generation [41.94295877935867]
  This paper presents a methodological framework for using generative AI in educational survey research.<n>We explore how Large Language Models can generate adaptive, context-aware survey questions.<n>We examine ethical issues such as bias, privacy, and transparency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T09:50:34Z)
• Synergizing Self-Regulation and Artificial-Intelligence Literacy Towards Future Human-AI Integrative Learning [92.34299949916134]
  Self-regulated learning (SRL) and Artificial-Intelligence (AI) literacy are becoming key competencies for successful human-AI interactive learning.<n>This study analyzed data from 1,704 Chinese undergraduates using clustering methods to uncover four learner groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T13:41:21Z)
• What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the Ethos of AI-driven Higher education [0.6216023343793144]
  This study introduces the Human-Driven AI in Higher Education (HD-AIHED) Framework to ensure compliance with UNESCO and OECD ethical standards.<n>The study applies a participatory co-system, Phased Human Intelligence, SWOC analysis, and AI ethical review boards to assess AI readiness and governance strategies for universities and HE institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T11:13:31Z)
• Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
  This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z)
• The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Measurement: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges [2.569083526579529]
  AI in education raises ethical concerns regarding validity, reliability, transparency, fairness, and equity. Various stakeholders, including educators, policymakers, and organizations, have developed guidelines to ensure ethical AI use in education. In this paper, a diverse group of AIME members examines the ethical implications of AI-powered tools in educational measurement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T05:28:40Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Toward enriched Cognitive Learning with XAI [44.99833362998488]
  We introduce an intelligent system (CL-XAI) for Cognitive Learning which is supported by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The use of CL-XAI is illustrated with a game-inspired virtual use case where learners tackle problems to enhance problem-solving skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T16:13:47Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.