Outcome Rewards Do Not Guarantee Verifiable or Causally Important Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22074v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:01:34 GMT
• Title: Outcome Rewards Do Not Guarantee Verifiable or Causally Important Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We show that RLVR does not always lead models to rely on reasoning in the way that is commonly thought.<n>This issue can be remedied with simple modifications to the post-training procedure.
• Score: 42.998601712623525
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) on chain-of-thought reasoning has become a standard part of language model post-training recipes. A common assumption is that the reasoning chains trained through RLVR reliably represent how a model gets to its answer. In this paper, we develop two metrics for critically examining this assumption: Causal Importance of Reasoning (CIR), which measures the cumulative effect of reasoning tokens on the final answer, and Sufficiency of Reasoning (SR), which measures whether a verifier can arrive at an unambiguous answer based on the reasoning alone. Through experiments with the Qwen2.5 model series and ReasoningGym tasks, we find that: (1) while RLVR does improve task accuracy, it does not reliably improve CIR or SR, calling the role of reasoning in model performance into question; (2) a small amount of SFT before RLVR can be a remedy for low CIR and SR; and (3) CIR and SR can be improved even without SFT by applying auxiliary CIR/SR rewards on top of the outcome-based reward. This joint reward matches the accuracy of RLVR while also leading to causally important and sufficient reasoning. These results show that RLVR does not always lead models to rely on reasoning in the way that is commonly thought, but this issue can be remedied with simple modifications to the post-training procedure.

Related papers

• From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement [56.26277769790695]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has driven recent progress in reasoning-oriented large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Reinforcement Learning with Self-Verifiable Rewards (RLSVR), a task-transformation-based training paradigm for extending RLVR to open-ended tasks.<n>We instantiate RLSVR with SpyRL, a Self-PlaY Reinforcement Learning method inspired by social deduction game Who Is the Spy?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-26T19:04:33Z)
• SVR-R1: Bootstrapping Multi-modal Reasoning with Self-verification in Reinforcement Learning [47.4480595602701]
  We introduce Self-Verified Reasoner (SVR-R1), a multi-turn RL framework that turns a model's own verification into a learning signal for multimodal reasoning.<n>For each query, the model proposes an answer using the same weights, and issues a binary self-verdict (Yes/No)<n>A 'No' triggers a second-chance rethink; a 'Yes,' or a turn cap, finalizes the output for computing the outcome-based reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T00:21:30Z)
• SAGE: Shaping Anchors for Guided Exploration in RLVR of LLMs [55.46289074417954]
  reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) reliably improves pass@1 on reasoning tasks, yet often fails to yield comparable gains in pass@k.<n>We argue that a central structural constraint arises from reverse-KL regularization, which stabilizes training but inherently anchors the policy to the reference distribution.<n>We propose SAGE, a principled framework that enables controllable empirical support expansion by reshaping the reverse-KL anchor distribution itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T07:42:21Z)
• Beyond Correctness: Learning Robust Reasoning via Transfer [51.403609251508904]
  We adopt a simple philosophical view, robust reasoning should remain useful beyond the mind that produced it.<n>We introduce Reinforcement Learning with Transferable Reward, which operationalizes robustness via transfer reward.<n>Our approach improves sampling consistency while improving final answer accuracy, and it reaches comparable performance in substantially fewer training steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T10:41:44Z)
• From Verifiable Dot to Reward Chain: Harnessing Verifiable Reference-based Rewards for Reinforcement Learning of Open-ended Generation [52.62655622099456]
  We propose reinforcement learning with verifiable reference-based rewards (RLVRR)<n>Instead of checking the final answer, RLVRR extracts an ordered linguistic signal from high-quality references (i.e., reward chain)<n>In this way, RLVRR decomposes rewards into two dimensions: content, which preserves deterministic core concepts, and style, which evaluates adherence to stylistic properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T14:39:58Z)
• Generalization of RLVR Using Causal Reasoning as a Testbed [20.97376329817835]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising paradigm for post-training large language models.<n>This paper provides an empirical study of RLVR generalization in the setting of probabilistic inference over causal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T20:45:31Z)
• Limits of Generalization in RLVR: Two Case Studies in Mathematical Reasoning [3.437656066916039]
  Reinforcement with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing such capabilities.<n>We investigate RLVR on two problems with fully verifiable solutions.<n>We find that RLVR improves evaluation metrics but often by reinforcing superficial Learning metrics rather than acquiring new reasoning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T23:16:02Z)
• PACR: Progressively Ascending Confidence Reward for LLM Reasoning [55.06373646059141]
  We propose Progressively Ascending Confidence Reward (PACR)<n>PACR is a dense, model-intrinsic reward computed directly from the model's evolving belief in the correct answer.<n>Our results suggest that dense, model-intrinsic shaping signals can make RLVR training more effective and reliable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T11:25:35Z)
• RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers [103.14103272635893]
  We propose RLPR, a simple verifier-free framework that extrapolates RLVR to broader general domains.<n>We find that addressing the high variance of this noisy probability reward is crucial to make it work.<n>RLPR consistently improves reasoning capabilities in both areas for Gemma, Llama, and Qwen based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T02:56:36Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs [35.27561531876348]
  This paper systematically investigates the impact of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We show that RLVR can extend the reasoning boundary for both mathematical and coding tasks.<n>We present a theoretical framework explaining RLVR's incentive mechanism, demonstrating how it can encourage correct reasoning even when rewards are based solely on answer correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T07:06:56Z)
• Don't "Overthink" Passage Reranking: Is Reasoning Truly Necessary? [60.725923225442095]
  We compare reasoning-based pointwise rerankers (ReasonRR) to standard, non-reasoning pointwise rerankers (StandardRR) under identical training conditions.<n>We find that ReasonRR-NoReason is surprisingly more effective than ReasonRR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T16:41:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.