Representational Harms in LLM-Generated Narratives Against Global Majority Nationalities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22749v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:49:09 GMT
• Title: Representational Harms in LLM-Generated Narratives Against Global Majority Nationalities
• Abstract summary: We study how national origin identities are portrayed by widely-adopted large language models (LLMs)<n>Our findings demonstrate the presence of persistent representational harms by national origin, including harmful stereotypes, erasure, and one-dimensional portrayals of Global Majority identities.<n>We find that the harms we identify cannot be explained away via sycophancy, as US-centric biases persist even when replacing US nationality cues with non-US national identities in the prompts.
• Score: 1.5371856226502076
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for text generation tasks from everyday use to high-stakes enterprise and government applications, including simulated interviews with asylum seekers. While many works highlight the new potential applications of LLMs, there are risks of LLMs encoding and perpetuating harmful biases about non-dominant communities across the globe. To better evaluate and mitigate such harms, more research examining how LLMs portray diverse individuals is needed. In this work, we study how national origin identities are portrayed by widely-adopted LLMs in response to open-ended narrative generation prompts. Our findings demonstrate the presence of persistent representational harms by national origin, including harmful stereotypes, erasure, and one-dimensional portrayals of Global Majority identities. Minoritized national identities are simultaneously underrepresented in power-neutral stories and overrepresented in subordinated character portrayals, which are over fifty times more likely to appear than dominant portrayals. The degree of harm is amplified when US nationality cues (e.g., ``American'') are present in input prompts. Notably, we find that the harms we identify cannot be explained away via sycophancy, as US-centric biases persist even when replacing US nationality cues with non-US national identities in the prompts. Based on our findings, we call for further exploration of cultural harms in LLMs through methodologies that center Global Majority perspectives and challenge the uncritical adoption of US-based LLMs for the classification, surveillance, and misrepresentation of the majority of our planet.

Related papers

• Language Models Change Facts Based on the Way You Talk [38.44076602344941]
  We find that large language models (LLMs) are extremely sensitive to markers of identity in user queries.<n>These biases mean that the use of off-the-shelf LLMs for these applications may cause harmful differences in medical care, foster wage gaps, and create different political factual realities for people of different identities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T13:21:17Z)
• Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese [52.98034458924209]
  This study investigates whether Large Language Models exhibit differential performance when prompted in two variants of written Chinese.<n>We design two benchmark tasks that reflect real-world scenarios: regional term choice and regional name choice.<n>Our analyses indicate that biases in LLM responses are dependent on both the task and prompting language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:56:49Z)
• Sometimes the Model doth Preach: Quantifying Religious Bias in Open LLMs through Demographic Analysis in Asian Nations [8.769839351949997]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating opinions and propagating bias unknowingly.<n>Our work proposes a novel method that quantitatively analyzes the opinions generated by LLMs.<n>We evaluate modern, open LLMs such as Llama and Mistral on surveys conducted in various global south countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T16:32:03Z)
• Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [71.65505524599888]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language.<n>This paper shows that the ideological stance of an LLM appears to reflect the worldview of its creators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z)
• Hate Personified: Investigating the role of LLMs in content moderation [64.26243779985393]
  For subjective tasks such as hate detection, where people perceive hate differently, the Large Language Model's (LLM) ability to represent diverse groups is unclear. By including additional context in prompts, we analyze LLM's sensitivity to geographical priming, persona attributes, and numerical information to assess how well the needs of various groups are reflected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:43:17Z)
• Exploring Changes in Nation Perception with Nationality-Assigned Personas in LLMs [0.0]
  We find that all LLM-persona combinations tend to favor Western European nations. Nation-personas push LLM behaviors to focus more on and treat the nation-persona's own region more favorably. Eastern European, Latin American, and African nations are treated more negatively by different nationality personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T04:44:20Z)
• White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking and Mitigating Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs [58.27353205269664]
  Social biases can manifest in language agency in Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content.<n>We introduce the Language Agency Bias Evaluation benchmark, which comprehensively evaluates biases in LLMs.<n>Using LABE, we unveil language agency social biases in 3 recent LLMs: ChatGPT, Llama3, and Mistral.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T12:27:54Z)
• Laissez-Faire Harms: Algorithmic Biases in Generative Language Models [0.0]
  We show that synthetically generated texts from five of the most pervasive LMs perpetuate harms of omission, subordination, and stereotyping for minoritized individuals. We find widespread evidence of bias to an extent that such individuals are hundreds to thousands of times more likely to encounter LM-generated outputs. Our findings highlight the urgent need to protect consumers from discriminatory harms caused by language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T05:09:03Z)
• ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming [64.86326523181553]
  ALERT is a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T15:01:47Z)
• Whose Side Are You On? Investigating the Political Stance of Large Language Models [56.883423489203786]
  We investigate the political orientation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics. Our investigation delves into the political alignment of LLMs across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics, spanning from abortion to LGBTQ issues. The findings suggest that users should be mindful when crafting queries, and exercise caution in selecting neutral prompt language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T04:02:24Z)
• A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Models [46.43476815725323]
  Large language models (LLMs) can produce harmful responses. This paper introduces a dataset for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs. We then extend it to two other scenarios that can be used to better identify false negative and false positive examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T14:56:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.