Small Language Model Helps Resolve Semantic Ambiguity of LLM Prompt

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23263v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 12:13:26 GMT
• Title: Small Language Model Helps Resolve Semantic Ambiguity of LLM Prompt
• Abstract summary: We propose a pre-inference prompt optimization mechanism via explicit prompt disambiguation.<n>We identify semantic risks in the prompt, check their multi-perspective consistency, and resolve any semantic conflicts.<n>Our method improves reasoning performance by 2.5 points at a cost of only $0.02.
• Score: 13.863963355859175
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in various complex reasoning tasks due to their excellent instruction following capability. However, the model's performance is highly dependent on the open-ended characteristics of the users' input prompt. Natural prompts often do not follow proper syntactic rules, which creates ambiguous queries that yield multiple interpretations. Such ambiguous prompts confuse the model in choosing the correct reasoning paths to answer questions. Prior works address this challenge by applying query editing during the LLM inference process without explicitly solving the root cause of the ambiguity. To address this limitation, we propose a pre-inference prompt optimization mechanism via explicit prompt disambiguation. Particularly, we identify semantic risks in the prompt, check their multi-perspective consistency, and resolve any semantic conflicts that arise. Finally, we organize the resolved ambiguities in a logically structured manner as a clean input to the LLM. By explicitly resolving semantic ambiguity, our method can produce a more focused attention distribution to the semantically essential tokens. We also leverage small language models (SLMs) as the main executor of prompt disambiguation to benefit from their efficient computation. Through comprehensive experiments on multiple benchmarks, we demonstrate that our method improves reasoning performance by 2.5 points at a cost of only \$0.02. Our study promotes explicit prompt disambiguation as an effective prompt optimization method without disturbing the internal mechanism of LLM inference.

Related papers

• ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation [54.788849448970154]
  We introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench.<n>Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T09:58:59Z)
• Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z)
• Ambiguity in LLMs is a concept missing problem [12.039364223570479]
  Ambiguity in natural language is a significant obstacle for achieving accurate text to structured data mapping.<n>We adopt a different approach that characterizes representation differences of ambiguous text in the latent space.<n>We introduce a new distance measure based on a path kernel over concepts to distinguish ambiguous from unambiguous questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T20:39:30Z)
• Clarifying Ambiguities: on the Role of Ambiguity Types in Prompting Methods for Clarification Generation [5.259846811078731]
  We focus on the concept of ambiguity for clarification, seeking to model and integrate ambiguities in the clarification process.<n>We name this new prompting scheme Ambiguity Type-Chain of Thought (AT-CoT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T14:21:02Z)
• Short-Path Prompting in LLMs: Analyzing Reasoning Instability and Solutions for Robust Performance [33.16322104912836]
  Large language models' (LLMs) reasoning is largely due to the chain-of-thought (CoT) approaches.<n>LLMs are instruction-tuned to provide long and detailed CoT pathways when responding to reasoning-related questions.<n>Human beings are naturally cognitive misers and will prompt language models to give rather short responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T14:12:14Z)
• Prompting Strategies for Enabling Large Language Models to Infer Causation from Correlation [68.58373854950294]
  We focus on causal reasoning and address the task of establishing causal relationships based on correlation information.<n>We introduce a prompting strategy for this problem that breaks the original task into fixed subquestions.<n>We evaluate our approach on an existing causal benchmark, Corr2Cause.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T15:32:27Z)
• Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models [97.26827060106581]
  We propose a new inference paradigm that decomposes the complex inference process into two distinct and clear actions.<n>Our experiment results show that this decomposition improves model performance and enhances the interpretability of the inference process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T17:55:38Z)
• Do LLMs Understand Ambiguity in Text? A Case Study in Open-world Question Answering [15.342415325821063]
  Ambiguity in natural language poses significant challenges to Large Language Models (LLMs) used for open-domain question answering. We compare off-the-shelf and few-shot LLM performance, focusing on measuring the impact of explicit disambiguation strategies. We demonstrate how simple, training-free, token-level disambiguation methods may be effectively used to improve LLM performance for ambiguous question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T10:27:26Z)
• DynaThink: Fast or Slow? A Dynamic Decision-Making Framework for Large Language Models [42.95876831743256]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent capabilities across diverse reasoning tasks via Chains-of-Thought prompting. This paper addresses the challenge of enabling LLMs to autonomously select between fast and slow inference methods. We introduce a dynamic decision-making framework that categorizes tasks into two distinct pathways: 'Fast', designated for tasks where the LLM quickly identifies a high-confidence solution, and 'Slow', allocated for tasks that the LLM perceives as complex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T06:45:13Z)
• Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity [22.078095273053506]
  We propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns language models to deal with ambiguous queries. Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries. Our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T07:59:53Z)
• Large Language Models as an Indirect Reasoner: Contrapositive and Contradiction for Automated Reasoning [74.90592233107712]
  We propose a Direct-Indirect Reasoning (DIR) method, which considers Direct Reasoning (DR) and Indirect Reasoning (IR) as multiple parallel reasoning paths that are merged to derive the final answer.<n>Our DIR method is simple yet effective and can be straightforwardly integrated with existing variants of CoT methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T03:41:12Z)
• SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
  We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer. We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.