MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23321v1
- Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 14:15:05 GMT
- Title: MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models
- Abstract summary: Multimodal embedding models aim to map heterogeneous inputs, such as text, images, videos, and audio, into a shared semantic space.<n>We introduce MMEB-V3, a benchmark that evaluates embeddings across text, image, video, audio, as well as agent-centric scenarios.<n>We conduct a systematic analysis of full-modality embeddings and identify three key findings.
- Score: 70.34265674686516
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal embedding models aim to map heterogeneous inputs, such as text, images, videos, and audio, into a shared semantic space. However, existing methods and benchmarks remain largely limited to partial modality coverage, making it difficult to systematically evaluate full-modality representation learning. In this work, we take a step toward the full-modality setting. We introduce MMEB-V3, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates embeddings across text, image, video, audio, as well as agent-centric scenarios. To enable more fine-grained diagnosis, we further construct OmniSET (Omni-modality Semantic Equivalence Tuples), where semantically equivalent instances are represented across modalities, allowing us to disentangle semantic similarity from modality effects. Through experiments on MMEB-V3, we conduct a systematic analysis of full-modality embeddings and identify three key findings: (1) models often fail to retrieve the intended target modality; (2) cross-modal retrieval is highly asymmetric and dominated by query-modality bias; and (3) instruction-induced shifts are either insufficient or misaligned with the target modality, and therefore do not reliably improve retrieval. These results indicate that current multimodal embeddings are not yet capable of reliably enforcing modality constraints specified by instructions, and consequently fail to exhibit consistent modality-aware retrieval behavior. We hope MMEB-V3 provides a useful benchmark for understanding and diagnosing these limitations, and for guiding future research on full-modality embeddings.
Related papers
- Learning from Reliable Latent Prompts for Visual Recognition with Missing Modalities [0.0]
Large-scale multimodal models (LMMs) have achieved superior performance in visual recognition by synergizing information across diverse, massive-scale paired modalities.<n>In real-world scenarios, however, missing-modality inputs are ubiquitous, causing models optimized for modality-complete data to exhibit precipitous performance degradation.<n>Existing research has introduced prompt learning to mitigate this issue, typically by generating dynamic prompts from instance-level features.<n>As higher missing rates increase the proportion of incomplete modalities, the resulting instability in prompt learning limits the model's performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T17:36:47Z) - Progressive Representation Learning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis with Incomplete Modalities [26.613566093134065]
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis seeks to infer human emotions by integrating textual, acoustic, and visual cues.<n>Existing approaches often rely on all modalities are completeness, whereas real-world applications frequently encounter noise, hardware failures, or privacy restrictions that result in missing modalities.<n>We propose PRLF, a Progressive Representation Learning Framework designed for MSA under uncertain missing-modality conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T02:45:02Z) - I$^3$-MRec: Invariant Learning with Information Bottleneck for Incomplete Modality Recommendation [56.55935146424585]
We introduce textbfI$3$-MRec, which learns with textbfInformation bottleneck principle for textbfIncomplete textbfModality textbfRecommendation.<n>By treating each modality as a distinct semantic environment, I$3$-MRec employs invariant risk minimization (IRM) to learn preference-oriented representations.<n>I$3$-MRec consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art MRS methods across various modality-missing scenarios
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T09:29:50Z) - Test-Time Consistency in Vision Language Models [26.475993408532304]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks.<n>Recent benchmarks, such as MM-R3, highlight that even state-of-the-art VLMs can produce divergent predictions across semantically equivalent inputs.<n>We propose a simple and effective test-time consistency framework that enhances semantic consistency without supervised re-training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-27T17:09:44Z) - Dynamic Modality Scheduling for Multimodal Large Models via Confidence, Uncertainty, and Semantic Consistency [0.0]
We propose Dynamic Modality Scheduling (DMS), a novel framework that adaptively adjusts the contribution of each modality at a per-sample level.<n> Experimental results on VQA, image-text retrieval, and captioning tasks show that DMS significantly improves both clean and robust performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-15T05:15:52Z) - Benchmarking Multi-modal Semantic Segmentation under Sensor Failures: Missing and Noisy Modality Robustness [61.87055159919641]
Multi-modal semantic segmentation (MMSS) addresses the limitations of single-modality data by integrating complementary information across modalities.<n>Despite notable progress, a significant gap persists between research and real-world deployment due to variability and uncertainty in multi-modal data quality.<n>We introduce a robustness benchmark that evaluates MMSS models under three scenarios: Entire-Missing Modality (EMM), Random-Missing Modality (RMM), and Noisy Modality (NM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-24T08:46:52Z) - Cross-Attention is Not Enough: Incongruity-Aware Dynamic Hierarchical
Fusion for Multimodal Affect Recognition [69.32305810128994]
Incongruity between modalities poses a challenge for multimodal fusion, especially in affect recognition.
We propose the Hierarchical Crossmodal Transformer with Dynamic Modality Gating (HCT-DMG), a lightweight incongruity-aware model.
HCT-DMG: 1) outperforms previous multimodal models with a reduced size of approximately 0.8M parameters; 2) recognizes hard samples where incongruity makes affect recognition difficult; 3) mitigates the incongruity at the latent level in crossmodal attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T01:24:15Z) - Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal
Representation Learning [53.68371566336254]
We argue that the key to better performance lies in meaningful latent modality structures instead of perfect modality alignment.
Specifically, we design 1) a deep feature separation loss for intra-modality regularization; 2) a Brownian-bridge loss for inter-modality regularization; and 3) a geometric consistency loss for both intra- and inter-modality regularization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-10T14:38:49Z) - Exploiting modality-invariant feature for robust multimodal emotion
recognition with missing modalities [76.08541852988536]
We propose to use invariant features for a missing modality imagination network (IF-MMIN)
We show that the proposed model outperforms all baselines and invariantly improves the overall emotion recognition performance under uncertain missing-modality conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-27T12:16:25Z) - Self-attention fusion for audiovisual emotion recognition with
incomplete data [103.70855797025689]
We consider the problem of multimodal data analysis with a use case of audiovisual emotion recognition.
We propose an architecture capable of learning from raw data and describe three variants of it with distinct modality fusion mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:04:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.