Personality Shapes Gender Bias in Persona-Conditioned LLM Narratives Across English and Hindi: An Empirical Investigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23600v1
• Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:25:09 GMT
• Title: Personality Shapes Gender Bias in Persona-Conditioned LLM Narratives Across English and Hindi: An Empirical Investigation
• Abstract summary: We present a controlled study of persona-conditioned story generation in English and Hindi.<n>We find that personality traits are significantly associated with both the magnitude and direction of gender bias.
• Score: 16.70411532307821
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in persona-driven applications such as education, customer service, and social platforms, where models are prompted to adopt specific personas when interacting with users. While persona conditioning can improve user experience and engagement, it also raises concerns about how personality cues may interact with gender biases and stereotypes. In this work, we present a controlled study of persona-conditioned story generation in English and Hindi, where each story portrays a working professional in India producing context-specific artifacts (e.g., lesson plans, reports, letters) under systematically varied persona gender, occupational role, and personality traits from the HEXACO and Dark Triad frameworks. Across 23,400 generated stories from six state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that personality traits are significantly associated with both the magnitude and direction of gender bias. In particular, Dark Triad personality traits are consistently associated with higher gender-stereotypical representations compared to socially desirable HEXACO traits, though these associations vary across models and languages. Our findings demonstrate that gender bias in LLMs is not static but context-dependent. This suggests that persona-conditioned systems used in real-world applications may introduce uneven representational harms, reinforcing gender stereotypes in generated educational, professional, or social content.

Related papers

• Investigating Gender Bias in LLM-Generated Stories via Psychological Stereotypes [8.091664636677637]
  We investigate gender bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) using gender stereotypes studied in psychology.<n>We introduce a novel dataset called StereoBias-Stories containing short stories either unconditioned or conditioned on (one, two, or six) random attributes from 25 psychological stereotypes.<n>We analyze how the gender contribution in the overall story changes in response to these attributes and present three key findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T10:10:26Z)
• From Individuals to Interactions: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Multimodal Large Language Models from the Lens of Social Relationship [13.416624729344477]
  We introduce Genres, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate gender bias in MLLMs through the lens of social in relationships generated narratives.<n>Our findings underscore the importance of relationship-aware benchmarks for diagnosing subtle, interaction-driven gender bias in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T06:03:21Z)
• More Women, Same Stereotypes: Unpacking the Gender Bias Paradox in Large Language Models [3.154053412440065]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet concerns persist regarding their tendency to reflect or amplify social biases.<n>This study introduces a novel evaluation framework to uncover gender biases in LLMs.<n>A systematic analysis of ten prominent LLMs shows a consistent pattern of overrepresenting female characters across occupations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T07:15:45Z)
• Gender Bias in Text-to-Video Generation Models: A case study of Sora [63.064204206220936]
  This study investigates the presence of gender bias in OpenAI's Sora, a text-to-video generation model.<n>We uncover significant evidence of bias by analyzing the generated videos from a diverse set of gender-neutral and stereotypical prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T18:08:13Z)
• Revealing and Reducing Gender Biases in Vision and Language Assistants (VLAs) [82.57490175399693]
  We study gender bias in 22 popular image-to-text vision-language assistants (VLAs)<n>Our results show that VLAs replicate human biases likely present in the data, such as real-world occupational imbalances.<n>To eliminate the gender bias in these models, we find that fine-tuning-based debiasing methods achieve the best trade-off between debiasing and retaining performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T05:59:44Z)
• Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts [49.97673761305336]
  We evaluate three large language models (LLMs) for their alignment with human narrative styles and potential gender biases. Our findings indicate that, while these models generally produce text closely resembling human authored content, variations in stylistic features suggest significant gender biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:26:11Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Representation Bias in Gendered Language Corpora [9.959039325564744]
  Large language models (LLMs) often inherit and amplify social biases embedded in their training data.<n>Gender bias is the association of specific roles or traits with a particular gender.<n>Gender representation bias is the unequal frequency of references to individuals of different genders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T16:30:58Z)
• Hire Me or Not? Examining Language Model's Behavior with Occupation Attributes [7.718858707298602]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into production pipelines, like recruitment and recommendation systems.<n>This paper investigates LLMs' behavior with respect to gender stereotypes, in the context of occupation decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T18:09:32Z)
• Are Personalized Stochastic Parrots More Dangerous? Evaluating Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems [103.416202777731]
  We study "persona biases", which we define to be the sensitivity of dialogue models' harmful behaviors contingent upon the personas they adopt. We categorize persona biases into biases in harmful expression and harmful agreement, and establish a comprehensive evaluation framework to measure persona biases in five aspects: Offensiveness, Toxic Continuation, Regard, Stereotype Agreement, and Toxic Agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T21:03:18Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.