QEVA: A Reference-Free Evaluation Metric for Narrative Video Summarization with Multimodal Question Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24052v1
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 05:18:21 GMT
- Title: QEVA: A Reference-Free Evaluation Metric for Narrative Video Summarization with Multimodal Question Answering
- Abstract summary: We propose QEVA, a reference-free metric evaluating candidate summaries directly against source videos through multimodal question answering.<n>We also introduce MLVU(VS)-Eval, a new annotated benchmark derived from the MLVU dataset, comprising 800 summaries generated from 200 videos using state-of-the-art video-language multimodal models.
- Score: 3.991227825628154
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Video-to-text summarization remains underexplored in terms of comprehensive evaluation methods. Traditional n-gram overlap-based metrics and recent large language model (LLM)-based approaches depend heavily on human-written reference summaries, limiting their practicality and sensitivity to nuanced semantic aspects. In this paper, we propose QEVA, a reference-free metric evaluating candidate summaries directly against source videos through multimodal question answering. QEVA assesses summaries along three clear dimensions: Coverage, Factuality, and Chronology. We also introduce MLVU(VS)-Eval, a new annotated benchmark derived from the MLVU dataset, comprising 800 summaries generated from 200 videos using state-of-the-art video-language multimodal models. This dataset establishes a transparent and consistent framework for evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that QEVA shows higher correlation with human judgments compared to existing approaches, as measured by Kendall's $τ_b$, $τ_c$, and Spearman's $ρ$. We hope that our benchmark and metric will facilitate meaningful progress in video-to-text summarization research and provide valuable insights for the development of future evaluation methods.
Related papers
- HAVEN: Hierarchically Aligned Multimodal Benchmark for Unified Video Understanding [1.8482679687103294]
HAVEN is a hierarchically aligned multimodal benchmark for unified video understanding.<n>Built upon this unified annotation paradigm, we propose a comprehensive evaluation suite spanning summarization, temporal reasoning, multimodal grounding, and saliency ranking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T00:48:14Z) - Video-MME-v2: Towards the Next Stage in Benchmarks for Comprehensive Video Understanding [98.3098451637867]
Video-MME-v2 is a comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the robustness and faithfulness of video understanding.<n>To guarantee data quality, Video-MME-v2 is constructed through a rigorously controlled human annotation pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T17:59:56Z) - SummDiff: Generative Modeling of Video Summarization with Diffusion [17.773776413936435]
Video summarization is a task of shortening a video by choosing a subset of frames while preserving its essential moments.<n>Previous works have deterministically regressed to an averaged frame score over multiple raters, ignoring the inherent subjectivity of what constitutes a good summary.<n>We propose a novel problem formulation by framing video summarization as a conditional generation task.<n>Adopting diffusion models for the first time in video summarization, our proposed method, SummDiff, dynamically adapts to visual contexts and generates multiple candidate summaries conditioned on the input video.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T17:03:51Z) - FIOVA: A Multi-Annotator Benchmark for Human-Aligned Video Captioning [15.363132825156477]
We introduce FIOVA, a human-centric benchmark tailored for evaluation of large vision-language models (LVLMs)<n>It comprises 3,002 real-world videos (about 33.6s each), each annotated independently by five annotators.<n>We propose FIOVA-DQ, an event-level evaluation metric that incorporates cognitive weights derived from annotator consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-20T03:59:54Z) - MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z) - UBiSS: A Unified Framework for Bimodal Semantic Summarization of Videos [52.161513027831646]
We focus on a more comprehensive video summarization task named Bimodal Semantic Summarization of Videos (BiSSV)
We propose a Unified framework UBiSS for the BiSSV task, which models the saliency information in the video and generates a TM-summary and VM-summary simultaneously.
Experiments show that our unified framework achieves better performance than multi-stage summarization pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T03:55:25Z) - EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models [70.19437817951673]
We argue that it is hard to judge the large conditional generative models from the simple metrics since these models are often trained on very large datasets with multi-aspect abilities.
Our approach involves generating a diverse and comprehensive list of 700 prompts for text-to-video generation.
Then, we evaluate the state-of-the-art video generative models on our carefully designed benchmark, in terms of visual qualities, content qualities, motion qualities, and text-video alignment with 17 well-selected objective metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T17:50:46Z) - DeVAn: Dense Video Annotation for Video-Language Models [68.70692422636313]
We present a novel human annotated dataset for evaluating the ability for visual-language models to generate descriptions for real-world video clips.
The dataset contains 8.5K YouTube video clips of 20-60 seconds in duration and covers a wide range of topics and interests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T08:02:43Z) - A Closer Look at Debiased Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos:
Dataset, Metric, and Approach [53.727460222955266]
Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos (TSGV) aims to ground a natural language sentence in an untrimmed video.
Recent studies have found that current benchmark datasets may have obvious moment annotation biases.
We introduce a new evaluation metric "dR@n,IoU@m" that discounts the basic recall scores to alleviate the inflating evaluation caused by biased datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T08:58:18Z) - Video Summarization Based on Video-text Modelling [0.0]
We propose a multimodal self-supervised learning framework to obtain semantic representations of videos.
We also introduce a progressive video summarization method, where the important content in a video is pinpointed progressively to generate better summaries.
An objective evaluation framework is proposed to measure the quality of video summaries based on video classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-07T15:21:46Z) - Realistic Video Summarization through VISIOCITY: A New Benchmark and
Evaluation Framework [15.656965429236235]
We take steps towards making automatic video summarization more realistic by addressing several challenges.
Firstly, the currently available datasets either have very short videos or have few long videos of only a particular type.
We introduce a new benchmarking dataset VISIOCITY which comprises of longer videos across six different categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T02:44:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.