Strategic Bidding in 6G Spectrum Auctions with Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24156v1
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:13:11 GMT
- Title: Strategic Bidding in 6G Spectrum Auctions with Large Language Models
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are bidding agents in 6G spectrum auctions with budget constraints in vehicular networks.<n>This work provides the first systematic evaluation of LLM bidders in repeated spectrum auctions.<n>It offers new insights into how AI-driven agents can interact strategically and reshape market dynamics in future 6G networks.
- Score: 4.078328754149022
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Efficient and fair spectrum allocation is a central challenge in 6G networks, where massive connectivity and heterogeneous services continuously compete for limited radio resources. We investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as bidding agents in repeated 6G spectrum auctions with budget constraints in vehicular networks. Each user equipment (UE) acts as a rational player optimizing its long-term utility through repeated interactions. Using the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism as a benchmark for incentive-compatible, dominant-strategy truthfulness, we compare LLM-guided bidding against truthful and heuristic strategies. Unlike heuristics, LLMs leverage historical outcomes and prompt-based reasoning to adapt their bidding behavior dynamically. Results show that when the theoretical assumptions guaranteeing truthfulness hold, LLM bidders recover near-equilibrium outcomes consistent with VCG predictions. However, when these assumptions break -- such as under static budget constraints -- LLMs sustain longer participation and achieve higher utilities, revealing their ability to approximate adaptive equilibria beyond static mechanism design. This work provides the first systematic evaluation of LLM bidders in repeated spectrum auctions, offering new insights into how AI-driven agents can interact strategically and reshape market dynamics in future 6G networks.
Related papers
- Tackling Length Inflation Without Trade-offs: Group Relative Reward Rescaling for Reinforcement Learning [74.5532558466687]
Group Relative Reward Rescaling (GR$3$) is a general, continuous, and reward-dependent gating mechanism.<n> GR$3$maintains training dynamics and downstream performance comparable to standard GRPO.<n>It significantly mitigates length inflation, outperforming state-of-the-art length-regularized baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T08:41:34Z) - Large Language Models as Bidding Agents in Repeated HetNet Auction [4.305340565419997]
This paper investigates the integration of large language models (LLMs) as reasoning agents in repeated spectrum auctions within heterogeneous networks (HetNets)<n>We propose a distributed auction-based framework in which each base station (BS) independently conducts its own multi-channel auction, and user equipments (UEs) strategically decide both their association and bid values.<n> Simulation results reveal that the LLM-empowered UE achieves consistently higher channel access frequency and improved budget efficiency compared to benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T07:30:01Z) - Auction-Based RIS Allocation With DRL: Controlling the Cost-Performance Trade-Off [2.217288163160845]
We study the allocation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) in a multi-cell wireless network, where base stations compete for control of shared RIS units deployed at the cell edges.<n>We integrate deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents that learn to maximize performance while adhering to budget constraints.<n>Our results highlight the potential of combining auction-based allocation with adaptive RL mechanisms for efficient and fair utilization of RISs in next-generation wireless networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T06:22:14Z) - MAESTRO: Meta-learning Adaptive Estimation of Scalarization Trade-offs for Reward Optimization [56.074760766965085]
Group-Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as an efficient paradigm for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose MAESTRO, which treats reward scalarization as a dynamic latent policy, leveraging the model's terminal hidden states as a semantic bottleneck.<n>We formulate this as a contextual bandit problem within a bi-level optimization framework, where a lightweight Conductor network co-evolves with the policy by utilizing group-relative advantages as a meta-reward signal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T05:02:48Z) - Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z) - Symbiotic Agents: A Novel Paradigm for Trustworthy AGI-driven Networks [1.5684305805304426]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based autonomous agents are expected to play a vital role in the evolution of 6G networks.<n>We introduce a novel agentic paradigm that combines LLMs real-time optimization algorithms towards Trustworthy AI.<n>We propose an end-to-end architecture for AGI networks and evaluate it on a 5G testbed capturing channel fluctuations from moving vehicles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-23T17:01:23Z) - ReAgent-V: A Reward-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Video Understanding [71.654781631463]
ReAgent-V is a novel agentic video understanding framework.<n>It integrates efficient frame selection with real-time reward generation during inference.<n>Extensive experiments on 12 datasets demonstrate significant gains in generalization and reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T04:23:21Z) - Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure [91.7459076316849]
We establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning.<n>We show that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism.<n>We propose Supervised Optimism Correction, which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T07:50:03Z) - Enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) for Telecommunications using Knowledge Graphs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [52.8352968531863]
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in general-purpose natural language processing tasks.<n>This paper presents a novel framework that combines knowledge graph (KG) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques to enhance LLM performance in the telecom domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T15:58:08Z) - Highly Dynamic and Flexible Spatio-Temporal Spectrum Management with AI-Driven O-RAN: A Multi-Granularity Marketplace Framework [8.664317254613792]
Current spectrum-sharing frameworks struggle with adaptability, often being either static or insufficiently dynamic.<n>We propose an adaptive, AI-driven spectrum-sharing framework within the O-RAN architecture, integrating discriminative and generative AI (AI) to forecast spectrum needs across multiple timescales and spatial granularities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T17:21:10Z) - Towards Bridging the FL Performance-Explainability Trade-Off: A
Trustworthy 6G RAN Slicing Use-Case [0.5156484100374059]
6G network slicing requires highly performing AI models for efficient resource allocation and explainable decision-making.
This paper presents a novel explanation-guided in-hoc federated learning (FL) approach.
We quantitatively validate the faithfulness of the explanations via the so-called attribution-based confidence metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-24T15:51:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.