MemeScouts@LT-EDI 2026: Asking the Right Questions -- Prompted Weak Supervision for Meme Hate Speech Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24179v2
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:12:11 GMT
• Title: MemeScouts@LT-EDI 2026: Asking the Right Questions -- Prompted Weak Supervision for Meme Hate Speech Detection
• Abstract summary: We propose a prompted weak supervision (PWS) approach that decomposes meme understanding into targeted, question-based labeling functions.<n>Using a quantized Qwen3-VLM to extract features by answering targeted questions, our method outperforms direct VLM classification.<n>Our results highlight the effectiveness of prompted weak supervision for multilingual multimodal hate speech detection.
• Score: 11.764894232169153
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Detecting hate speech in memes is challenging due to their multimodal nature and subtle, culturally grounded cues such as sarcasm and context. While recent vision-language models (VLMs) enable joint reasoning over text and images, end-to-end prompting can be brittle, as a single prediction must resolve target, stance, implicitness, and irony. These challenges are amplified in multilingual settings. We propose a prompted weak supervision (PWS) approach that decomposes meme understanding into targeted, question-based labeling functions with constrained answer options for homophobia and transphobia detection in the LT-EDI 2026 shared task. Using a quantized Qwen3-VLM to extract features by answering targeted questions, our method outperforms direct VLM classification, with substantial gains for Chinese and Hindi, ranking 1st in English, 2nd in Chinese, and 3rd in Hindi. Iterative refinement via error-driven LF expansion and feature pruning reduces redundancy and improves generalization. Our results highlight the effectiveness of prompted weak supervision for multilingual multimodal hate speech detection.

Related papers

• Explain the Flag: Contextualizing Hate Speech Beyond Censorship [2.796818629124347]
  We present a hybrid approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with three newly created and curated vocabularies to detect and explain hate speech in English, French, and Greek.<n>Our system captures both inherently derogatory expressions tied to identity characteristics and direct group-targeted content through two complementary pipelines.<n>The outputs are fused into grounded explanations that clarify why content is flagged.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-16T13:06:28Z)
• More Than Sum of Its Parts: Deciphering Intent Shifts in Multimodal Hate Speech Detection [49.07221734365168]
  Hate speech on social media is critical for securing cyberspace, yet relies heavily on automated detection systems.<n>We characterize semantic intent shifts where modalities interact to construct implicit hate from benign cues or neutralize toxicity through semantic inversion.<n>We propose the Asymmetric Reasoning via Courtroom Agent DEbate framework to effectively decipher these complex cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T15:46:23Z)
• Synthetic Voices, Real Threats: Evaluating Large Text-to-Speech Models in Generating Harmful Audio [63.18443674004945]
  This work explores a content-centric threat: exploiting TTS systems to produce speech containing harmful content.<n>We present HARMGEN, a suite of five attacks organized into two families that address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T03:00:04Z)
• Fine-Grained Chinese Hate Speech Understanding: Span-Level Resources, Coded Term Lexicon, and Enhanced Detection Frameworks [13.187315629074428]
  We introduce the Span-level Target-Aware Toxicity Extraction dataset (STATE ToxiCN), the first span-level Chinese hate speech dataset.<n>We conduct the first comprehensive study on Chinese coded hate terms, LLMs' ability to interpret hate semantics.<n>We propose a method to integrate an annotated lexicon into models, significantly enhancing hate speech detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T13:19:18Z)
• Leveraging the Potential of Prompt Engineering for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages [2.8811725782388686]
  This paper investigates how we can overcome the limitation via prompt engineering on large language models (LLMs) focusing on low-resource Bengali language.<n>We investigate six prompting strategies - zero-shot prompting, refusal suppression, flattering the classifier, multi-shot prompting, role prompting, and finally our innovative metaphor prompting to detect hate speech effectively in low-resource languages.<n>To prove the effectiveness of our metaphor prompting in the low-resource Bengali language, we also evaluate it in another low-resource language Hindi, and two high-resource languages - English and German.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:59:25Z)
• CLAIM: Mitigating Multilingual Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models with Cross-Lingual Attention Intervention [56.08815340137881]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive multimodal abilities but remain prone to multilingual object hallucination.<n>We propose Cross-Lingual Attention Intervention for Mitigating multilingual object hallucination (CLAIM) in LVLMs, a novel near training-free method by aligning attention patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T11:17:16Z)
• Can Prompting LLMs Unlock Hate Speech Detection across Languages? A Zero-shot and Few-shot Study [59.30098850050971]
  This work evaluates LLM prompting-based detection across eight non-English languages.<n>We show that while zero-shot and few-shot prompting lag behind fine-tuned encoder models on most of the real-world evaluation sets, they achieve better generalization on functional tests for hate speech detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T16:00:01Z)
• Delving Deeper into Cross-lingual Visual Question Answering [115.16614806717341]
  We show that simple modifications to the standard training setup can substantially reduce the transfer gap to monolingual English performance. We analyze cross-lingual VQA across different question types of varying complexity for different multilingual multimodal Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T18:22:18Z)
• Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Lingual Hate Speech Detection [115.1352779982269]
  In this paper we focus on cross-lingual transfer learning to support hate speech detection in low-resource languages. We leverage cross-lingual word embeddings to train our neural network systems on the source language and apply it to the target language. We investigate the issue of label imbalance of hate speech datasets, since the high ratio of non-hate examples compared to hate examples often leads to low model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T20:48:14Z)
• Leveraging Transformers for Hate Speech Detection in Conversational Code-Mixed Tweets [36.29939722039909]
  This paper describes the system proposed by team MIDAS-IIITD for HASOC 2021 subtask 2. It is one of the first shared tasks focusing on detecting hate speech from Hindi-English code-mixed conversations on Twitter. Our best performing system, a hard voting ensemble of Indic-BERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and Multilingual BERT, achieved a macro F1 score of 0.7253.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-18T19:27:33Z)
• Cross-lingual hate speech detection based on multilingual domain-specific word embeddings [4.769747792846004]
  We propose to address the problem of multilingual hate speech detection from the perspective of transfer learning. Our goal is to determine if knowledge from one particular language can be used to classify other language. We show that the use of our simple yet specific multilingual hate representations improves classification results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T02:24:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.