A systematic evaluation of vision-language models for observational astronomical reasoning tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24589v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:11:31 GMT
• Title: A systematic evaluation of vision-language models for observational astronomical reasoning tasks
• Abstract summary: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed as general-purpose tools for scientific data interpretation, yet their reliability on real astronomical observations remains untested.<n>We present AstroVLBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising over 4,100 expert-verified instances across five tasks spanning optical imaging, radio interferometry, multi-wavelength photometry, time-domain light curves, and optical spectroscopy.
• Score: 3.608879177162859
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed as general-purpose tools for scientific data interpretation, yet their reliability on real astronomical observations across diverse modalities remains untested. We present AstroVLBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising over 4,100 expert-verified instances across five tasks spanning optical imaging, radio interferometry, multi-wavelength photometry, time-domain light curves, and optical spectroscopy. Evaluating six frontier models, we find that performance is strongly modality-dependent: while one model (Gemini 3 Pro) emerges as the most consistently capable across tasks, task-specific strengths vary, and all models substantially underperform domain-specialized methods. Mechanistic ablations reveal that performance depends not only on directing attention to salient visual features but also on grounding those features in physical knowledge. Phenomenological prompts describing what to look for improve accuracy by sharpening model focus, but physical prompts explaining why those features matter perform better overall and yield more balanced classifications with reduced class-specific bias. Consistent with this picture, presenting the underlying one-dimensional measurements directly as numerical tables instead of rendered plots yields up to 13 percentage points improvement. Reasoning quality analysis further demonstrates that, without explicit physical grounding, models may reach correct predictions from phenomenologically plausible cues while providing physically imprecise justifications, establishing that accuracy alone is insufficient for trustworthy scientific deployment. These findings provide the first systematic, multi-modal baselines for VLMs in observational astronomy and identify the specific representation, grounding, and reasoning bottlenecks where current models fail.

Related papers

• Trimming the Long-Tail of Visual World Modeling Evaluation [67.17191772079316]
  We introduce Tailor-Bench, a benchmark that challenges world models to simulate irregular physical interactions.<n>Regular scenarios reflect common tool-task pairs, Unconventional scenarios replace conventional tools with attribute-compatible substitutes, and Impossible scenarios introduce attribute-violating tools.<n>Our experimental results reveal a clear long-tail gap in physical world modeling, indicating limited generalization beyond common interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T07:43:41Z)
• The Art of Saying "Maybe": A Conformal Lens for Uncertainty Benchmarking in VLMs [6.159508352834952]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in complex visual understanding across scientific and reasoning tasks.<n>We conduct a comprehensive uncertainty benchmarking study, evaluating 16 state-of-the-art VLMs across 6 multimodal datasets with 3 distinct scoring functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T08:17:39Z)
• Radio Astronomy in the Era of Vision-Language Models: Prompt Sensitivity and Adaptation [5.711705587813085]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are positioned as general-purpose AI systems capable of reasoning across domains.<n>We assess whether generic VLMs, presumed to lack exposure to astronomical corpora, can perform morphology-based classification of radio galaxies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-31T14:31:47Z)
• Migration as a Probe: A Generalizable Benchmark Framework for Specialist vs. Generalist Machine-Learned Force Fields [1.572216094651749]
  Machine-learned force fields (MLFFs) are transforming computational materials science by enabling ab initio-level accuracy at molecular dynamics scales.<n>Yet their rapid rise raises a key question: should researchers train specialist models from scratch, fine-tune generalist foundation models, or use hybrid approaches?<n>We introduce a benchmarking framework using defect migration pathways, evaluated through elastic band trajectories, as diagnostic probes.<n>Fine-tuned models substantially outperform from-scratch and zero-shot approaches for kinetic properties but show partial loss of long-range physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T13:24:41Z)
• SpatialViz-Bench: An MLLM Benchmark for Spatial Visualization [44.427830927596204]
  SpatialViz-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for spatial visualization with 12 tasks across 4 sub-abilities, comprising 1,180 automatically generated problems.<n>Our evaluation of 33 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals wide performance variations and uncovers counter-intuitive findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T10:27:20Z)
• MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning [15.17428354380373]
  We introduce MagiC, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate grounded multimodal cognition.<n>We evaluate 15 vision-language models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters across four dimensions: final answer correctness, reasoning validity, grounding fidelity, and self-correction ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T21:44:12Z)
• Do Vision-Language Models Have Internal World Models? Towards an Atomic Evaluation [54.3628937181904]
  Internal world models (WMs) enable agents to understand the world's state and predict transitions.<n>Recent large Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as OpenAI o3, GPT-4o and Gemini, exhibit potential as general-purpose WMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T03:24:29Z)
• When Does Multimodality Lead to Better Time Series Forecasting? [96.26052272121615]
  We investigate whether and under what conditions such multimodal integration consistently yields gains.<n>Our findings reveal that the benefits of multimodality are highly condition-dependent.<n>Our study offers a rigorous, quantitative foundation for understanding when multimodality can be expected to aid forecasting tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T23:55:56Z)
• ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [68.46716645478661]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z)
• PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning? [49.083544963243206]
  Existing benchmarks fail to capture a crucial aspect of intelligence: physical reasoning.<n>We introduce PhyX: the first large-scale benchmark designed to assess models capacity for physics-grounded reasoning in visual scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T18:33:50Z)
• What Matters When Repurposing Diffusion Models for General Dense Perception Tasks? [49.84679952948808]
  Recent works show promising results by simply fine-tuning T2I diffusion models for dense perception tasks.<n>We conduct a thorough investigation into critical factors that affect transfer efficiency and performance when using diffusion priors.<n>Our work culminates in the development of GenPercept, an effective deterministic one-step fine-tuning paradigm tailed for dense visual perception tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T04:23:24Z)
• VisFIS: Visual Feature Importance Supervision with Right-for-the-Right-Reason Objectives [84.48039784446166]
  We show that model FI supervision can meaningfully improve VQA model accuracy as well as performance on several Right-for-the-Right-Reason metrics. Our best performing method, Visual Feature Importance Supervision (VisFIS), outperforms strong baselines on benchmark VQA datasets. Predictions are more accurate when explanations are plausible and faithful, and not when they are plausible but not faithful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T17:02:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.