Instrumental Variable Analysis Without Structural Equations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24660v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 16:24:35 GMT
• Title: Instrumental Variable Analysis Without Structural Equations
• Abstract summary: We consider debiased inference on at-squares solutions to inverse problems as a way to avoid having to assume exact solutions exist.<n>Our approach instead allows us to conduct inference on a quantity that is defined regardless of solutions existing.
• Score: 48.321087914639854
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We consider debiased inference on least-squares solutions to inverse problems as a way to avoid having to assume exact solutions exist. Such assumptions are substantive and not innocuous and their failure may well imperil inference when we impose them on the statistical model. Our approach instead allows us to conduct inference on a quantity that is defined regardless of solutions existing and coincides with the usual estimands when they do. For the case of instrumental variables, this means we can motivate the analysis with structural models but these do not need to hold exactly for the inferential procedure to remain valid.

Related papers

• The conditional-mean barrier: From deterministic regression to conditional distribution learning [6.160113667162026]
  This tutorial develops a self-contained module centered on the conditional-mean barrier.<n>Adding latent randomness to a squared-loss predictor collapses it back to the conditional mean.<n>We briefly organize common distributional objectives, including negative log-likelihood, moment and observable matching, variational objectives, adversarial divergences, and score matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T07:31:42Z)
• Non-Parametric Rehearsal Learning via Conditional Mean Embeddings [88.89267783967263]
  We propose a non-parametric rehearsal learning approach for textitavoiding undesired future (AUF) problems.<n>Specifically, we use kernel machinery to reformulate the AUF objective into a unified representation that disentangles desirability modeling from action-induced distributional changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T15:30:52Z)
• Nonparametric Factor Analysis and Beyond [14.232694150264628]
  We propose a general framework for identifying latent variables in the non-negligible settings.<n>We show that the generative model is identifiable up to certain submanifold indeterminacies even in the presence of non-negligible noise.<n>We have also developed corresponding estimation methods and validated them in various synthetic and real-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T05:45:03Z)
• Formalising causal inference as prediction on a target population [7.09435109588801]
  In this paper, we develop a version of the potential outcomes framework due to Neyman and Rubin.<n>We construes causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable in retrospect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T16:07:57Z)
• Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects [1.9253333342733674]
  Many causal estimands are only partially identifiable since they depend on the unobservable joint distribution between potential outcomes. We propose a unified and model-agnostic inferential approach for a wide class of partially identified estimands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T08:17:30Z)
• A Bias-Variance-Covariance Decomposition of Kernel Scores for Generative Models [13.527864898609398]
  We introduce the first bias-variance-covariance decomposition for kernel scores. We derive a kernel-based variance and entropy for uncertainty estimation. Based on the wide applicability of kernels, we demonstrate our framework via generalization and uncertainty experiments for image, audio, and language generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T16:22:11Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• Exploiting Independent Instruments: Identification and Distribution Generalization [3.701112941066256]
  We exploit the independence for distribution generalization by taking into account higher moments. We prove that the proposed estimator is invariant to distributional shifts on the instruments. These results hold even in the under-identified case where the instruments are not sufficiently rich to identify the causal function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T21:49:04Z)
• Disentangling Observed Causal Effects from Latent Confounders using Method of Moments [67.27068846108047]
  We provide guarantees on identifiability and learnability under mild assumptions. We develop efficient algorithms based on coupled tensor decomposition with linear constraints to obtain scalable and guaranteed solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T07:48:45Z)
• Estimation of Accurate and Calibrated Uncertainties in Deterministic models [0.8702432681310401]
  We devise a method to transform a deterministic prediction into a probabilistic one. We show that for doing so, one has to compromise between the accuracy and the reliability (calibration) of such a model. We show several examples both with synthetic data, where the underlying hidden noise can accurately be recovered, and with large real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-11T04:02:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.