Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24700v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:04:17 GMT
• Title: Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI
• Abstract summary: Green Shielding is a user-centric agenda for building evidence-backed deployment guidance.<n>We instantiate Green Shielding in medical diagnosis through HealthCareMagic-Diagnosis.<n>Although instantiated here in medical diagnosis, the agenda extends naturally to other decision-support settings and agentic AI systems.
• Score: 19.485991712624095
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, yet their outputs can be highly sensitive to routine, non-adversarial variation in how users phrase queries, a gap not well addressed by existing red-teaming efforts. We propose Green Shielding, a user-centric agenda for building evidence-backed deployment guidance by characterizing how benign input variation shifts model behavior. We operationalize this agenda through the CUE criteria: benchmarks with authentic Context, reference standards and metrics that capture true Utility, and perturbations that reflect realistic variations in the Elicitation of model behavior. Guided by the PCS framework and developed with practicing physicians, we instantiate Green Shielding in medical diagnosis through HealthCareMagic-Diagnosis (HCM-Dx), a benchmark of patient-authored queries, together with structured reference diagnosis sets and clinically grounded metrics for evaluating differential diagnosis lists. We also study perturbation regimes that capture routine input variation and show that prompt-level factors shift model behavior along clinically meaningful dimensions. Across multiple frontier LLMs, these shifts trace out Pareto-like tradeoffs. In particular, neutralization, which removes common user-level factors while preserving clinical content, increases plausibility and yields more concise, clinician-like differentials, but reduces coverage of highly likely and safety-critical conditions. Together, these results show that interaction choices can systematically shift task-relevant properties of model outputs and support user-facing guidance for safer deployment in high-stakes domains. Although instantiated here in medical diagnosis, the agenda extends naturally to other decision-support settings and agentic AI systems.

Related papers

• Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
  CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z)
• Same Patient, Different Words, Different Diagnosis? Evaluating Semantic Stability in Clinical LLMs [5.580559622582594]
  We introduce three metrics to quantify model sensitivity: MeaningPreserving Variation Sensitivity (MVS), confidence variation (C), and Worst-Case Instability (WCI)<n>Our results demonstrate that differences between domain-specific (DS) models are mixed and highly model-dependent, i.e., domain specialization does not consistently improve or reduce robustness to meaning-preserving prompt reformulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T23:03:43Z)
• Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study [72.46211022258122]
  Current AI systems struggle with calibrated reasoning under uncertainty.<n>We propose a framework for AI systems that can make practically useful but formally transparent clinical predictions under uncertainty.<n>We show how an initial proof-of-concept of this framework can be used for differential diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T19:30:16Z)
• Harmonized Feature Conditioning and Frequency-Prompt Personalization for Multi-Rater Medical Segmentation [4.894018780140715]
  Multi-rater medical image segmentation captures the inherent ambiguity of clinical interpretation.<n>We propose a harmonized probabilistic framework that disentangles acquisition artifacts from genuine annotator variability.<n>A lightweight Harmonizer Network implicitly models scanner-specific artifacts and performs dynamic feature modulation to standardize latent representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T09:13:38Z)
• A Multi-Agent Framework for Interpreting Multivariate Physiological Time Series [9.72130666902599]
  We present Vivaldi, a role-structured multi-agent system that explains multivariate physiological time series.<n>Our experiments show that agentic pipelines substantially benefit non-thinking and medically fine-tuned models.<n>We find that explicit tool-based computation is decisive for codifiable clinical metrics, whereas subjective targets, such as pain scores and length of stay, show limited or inconsistent changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T14:55:46Z)
• Overalignment in Frontier LLMs: An Empirical Study of Sycophantic Behaviour in Healthcare [1.9010852820067994]
  We propose the Adjusted Sycophancy Score, a novel metric that isolates alignment bias by accounting for model instability, or "confusability"<n>Our results suggest that benchmark performance is not a proxy for clinical reliability, and that simplified reasoning structures may offer superior robustness against expert-driven sycophancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T10:21:34Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• MMedExpert-R1: Strengthening Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Domain-Specific Adaptation and Clinical Guideline Reinforcement [63.82954136824963]
  Medical Vision-Language Models excel at perception tasks with complex clinical reasoning required in real-world scenarios.<n>We propose a novel reasoning MedVLM that addresses these challenges through domain-specific adaptation and guideline reinforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T02:32:07Z)
• Benchmarking Egocentric Clinical Intent Understanding Capability for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [48.95516224614331]
  We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation.<n>Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical, and implicit adherence to safety protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T02:20:40Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• Clinically Grounded Agent-based Report Evaluation: An Interpretable Metric for Radiology Report Generation [32.410641778559544]
  ICARE (Interpretable and Clinically-grounded Agent-based Report Evaluation) is an interpretable evaluation framework.<n>Two agents, each with either the ground-truth or generated report, generate clinically meaningful questions and quiz each other.<n>By linking scores to question-answer pairs, ICARE enables transparent, and interpretable assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T18:28:03Z)
• Embeddings to Diagnosis: Latent Fragility under Agentic Perturbations in Clinical LLMs [0.0]
  We propose a geometry-aware evaluation framework, LAPD (Latent Agentic Perturbation Diagnostics), which probes the latent robustness of clinical LLMs under structured adversarial edits.<n>Within this framework, we introduce Latent Diagnosis Flip Rate (LDFR), a model-agnostic diagnostic signal that captures representational instability when embeddings cross decision boundaries in PCA-reduced latent space.<n>Our results reveal a persistent gap between surface robustness and semantic stability, underscoring the importance of geometry-aware auditing in safety-critical clinical AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-27T16:48:53Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• An autonomous agent for auditing and improving the reliability of clinical AI models [11.225863068085266]
  We introduce ModelAuditor, a self-reflective agent that converses with users.<n>ModelAuditor simulates context-dependent, clinically relevant distribution shifts.<n>It then generates interpretable reports explaining how much performance likely degrades during deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T07:58:52Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
  Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.