Walking Through Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of Uncertainty Estimation for Audio-Aware Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25591v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:56:22 GMT
• Title: Walking Through Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of Uncertainty Estimation for Audio-Aware Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic empirical study of uncertainty estimation in audio-aware large language models (ALLMs)<n>We benchmark five representative methods, including predictive entropy, length-normalized entropy, semantic entropy, discrete semantic entropy, and P(True)<n>Our results reveal two key findings. First, semantic-level and verification-based methods consistently outperform token-level baselines on general audio reasoning benchmarks.
• Score: 54.041320081289996
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent audio-aware large language models (ALLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse audio understanding and reasoning tasks, but they still frequently produce hallucinated or overly confident outputs. While uncertainty estimation has been extensively studied in text-only LLMs, it remains largely unexplored for ALLMs, where audio-conditioned generation introduces additional challenges such as perceptual ambiguity and cross-modal grounding. In this work, we present the first systematic empirical study of uncertainty estimation in ALLMs. We benchmark five representative methods, including predictive entropy, length-normalized entropy, semantic entropy, discrete semantic entropy, and P(True), across multiple models and diverse evaluation settings spanning general audio understanding, reasoning, hallucination detection, and unanswerable question answering. Our results reveal two key findings. First, semantic-level and verification-based methods consistently outperform token-level baselines on general audio reasoning benchmarks. Second, on trustworthiness-oriented benchmarks, the relative effectiveness of uncertainty methods becomes notably more model- and benchmark-dependent, indicating that conclusions drawn from general reasoning settings do not straightforwardly transfer to hallucination and unanswerable-question scenarios. We further explore uncertainty-based adaptive inference as a potential downstream application. We hope this study provides a foundation for future research on reliable, uncertainty-aware audio-language systems.

Related papers

• The Origins of Stochasticity: Comprehensive Investigations on Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models [12.213066436465601]
  We propose a granular uncertainty taxonomy that attributes uncertainty into input-level, parameter-level, token-level, and decoding-process sources.<n>We introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework covering diverse generation settings and metrics.<n>Our experimental results demonstrate that (i) the effectiveness of UQ methods is sensitive to task types and generation settings; (ii) consensus-based methods consistently outperform other UQ approaches; and (iii) larger model scales correlate with lower uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T03:05:04Z)
• The Anatomy of Uncertainty in LLMs [10.50144444577399]
  We advocate for an uncertainty decomposition framework that dissects uncertainty into three distinct semantic components.<n>Our framework provides a better understanding to audit LLM reliability and detect hallucinations, paving the way for targeted interventions and more trustworthy systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T02:59:40Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models: Foundations, Methodology, and Future Directions [28.64896454455385]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain prone to hallucinations that produce plausible but factually incorrect outputs.<n>Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has emerged as a central research direction to address this issue.<n>We examine the role of UQ in hallucination detection, where quantifying uncertainty provides a mechanism for identifying unreliable generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T00:49:04Z)
• Towards Reliable LLM-based Robot Planning via Combined Uncertainty Estimation [68.106428321492]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities, enabling robots to understand natural language instructions and generate high-level plans with appropriate grounding.<n>LLMs hallucinations present a significant challenge, often leading to overconfident yet potentially misaligned or unsafe plans.<n>We present Combined Uncertainty estimation for Reliable Embodied planning (CURE), which decomposes the uncertainty into epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, each estimated separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T10:26:58Z)
• Semantic Reformulation Entropy for Robust Hallucination Detection in QA Tasks [13.230578301939907]
  Existing entropy-based semantic-level uncertainty estimation methods are limited by sampling noise and unstable clustering of variable-length answers.<n>We propose Semantic Reformulation Entropy (SRE), which improves uncertainty estimation in two ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T07:38:45Z)
• Semantic Volume: Quantifying and Detecting both External and Internal Uncertainty in LLMs [13.982395477368396]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks by encoding vast amounts of factual knowledge.<n>They are still prone to hallucinations, generating incorrect or misleading information, often accompanied by high uncertainty.<n>We introduce Semantic Volume, a novel measure for quantifying both external and internal uncertainty in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T17:09:08Z)
• CLUE: Concept-Level Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models [49.92690111618016]
  We propose a novel framework for Concept-Level Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models (LLMs) We leverage LLMs to convert output sequences into concept-level representations, breaking down sequences into individual concepts and measuring the uncertainty of each concept separately. We conduct experiments to demonstrate that CLUE can provide more interpretable uncertainty estimation results compared with sentence-level uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T18:27:12Z)
• To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM [51.2579827761899]
  We explore uncertainty quantification in large language models (LLMs) We derive an information-theoretic metric that allows to reliably detect when only epistemic uncertainty is large. We conduct a series of experiments which demonstrate the advantage of our formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T17:58:18Z)
• Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similarities [79.9629927171974]
  Uncertainty in Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for applications where safety and reliability are important. We propose Kernel Language Entropy (KLE), a novel method for uncertainty estimation in white- and black-box LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T12:42:05Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.