Progressing beyond Art Masterpieces or Touristic Clichés: how to assess your LLMs for cultural alignment?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25654v2
• Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 12:05:22 GMT
• Title: Progressing beyond Art Masterpieces or Touristic Clichés: how to assess your LLMs for cultural alignment?
• Abstract summary: We propose design guidelines for annotators and report on the construction of a dataset built according to these principles.<n>Results demonstrate that our design yields test sets with greater discriminative power.
• Score: 3.9253233234793394
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Although the cultural (mis)alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) has attracted increasing attention -- often framed in terms of cultural bias -- until recently there has been limited work on the design and development of datasets for cultural assessment. Here, we review existing approaches to such datasets and identify their main limitations. To address these issues, we propose design guidelines for annotators and report on the construction of a dataset built according to these principles. We further present a series of contrastive experiments conducted with this dataset. The results demonstrate that our design yields test sets with greater discriminative power, effectively distinguishing between models specialized for a given culture and those that are not, ceteris paribus.

Related papers

• Appear2Meaning: A Cross-Cultural Benchmark for Structured Cultural Metadata Inference from Images [28.09239790313765]
  We introduce a multi-category, cross-cultural benchmark for this task and evaluate vision-language models (VLMs)<n>To assess cultural reasoning, we report exact-match, partial-match, and attribute-level accuracy across cultural regions.<n>Results show that models capture fragmented signals and exhibit substantial performance variation across cultures and metadata types, leading to inconsistent and weakly grounded predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T17:53:26Z)
• Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Cross-cultural Differences? [53.481048019144644]
  We develop a scenario-based benchmark to evaluate large language models' cross-cultural understanding and reasoning.<n>Grounded in cultural theory, we categorize cross-cultural capabilities into nine dimensions.<n>The dataset supports continuous expansion, and experiments confirm its transferability to other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T01:21:58Z)
• CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs [57.653830744706305]
  CultureScope is the most comprehensive evaluation framework to date for assessing cultural understanding in large language models.<n>Inspired by the cultural iceberg theory, we design a novel dimensional schema for cultural knowledge classification.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively evaluate cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T17:47:48Z)
• CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluation [61.130639734982395]
  We introduce CAIRe, a novel evaluation metric that assesses the degree of cultural relevance of an image.<n>Our framework grounds entities and concepts in the image to a knowledge base and uses factual information to give independent graded judgments for each culture label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T17:16:23Z)
• CulFiT: A Fine-grained Cultural-aware LLM Training Paradigm via Multilingual Critique Data Synthesis [41.261808170896686]
  CulFiT is a novel training paradigm that leverages multilingual data and fine-grained reward modeling to enhance cultural sensitivity and inclusivity.<n>Our approach synthesizes diverse cultural-related questions, constructs critique data in culturally relevant languages, and employs fine-grained rewards to decompose cultural texts into verifiable knowledge units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T04:08:26Z)
• From Surveys to Narratives: Rethinking Cultural Value Adaptation in LLMs [62.9861554207279]
  Adapting cultural values in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents significant challenges.<n>Prior work primarily aligns LLMs with different cultural values using World Values Survey (WVS) data.<n>We investigate WVS-based training for cultural value adaptation and find that relying solely on survey data cane cultural norms and interfere with factual knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:00:01Z)
• CAReDiO: Cultural Alignment of LLM via Representativeness and Distinctiveness Guided Data Optimization [50.90288681622152]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) more deeply integrate into human life across various regions.<n>Existing approaches develop culturally aligned LLMs through fine-tuning with culture-specific corpora.<n>We introduce CAReDiO, a novel cultural data construction framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T13:40:13Z)
• CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models [63.452948673344395]
  This paper introduces CulturePark, an LLM-powered multi-agent communication framework for cultural data collection. It generates high-quality cross-cultural dialogues encapsulating human beliefs, norms, and customs. We evaluate these models across three downstream tasks: content moderation, cultural alignment, and cultural education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:49:02Z)
• Navigating Cultural Chasms: Exploring and Unlocking the Cultural POV of Text-To-Image Models [32.99865895211158]
  We explore the cultural perception embedded in Text-To-Image (TTI) models by characterizing culture across three tiers. We propose a comprehensive suite of evaluation techniques, including intrinsic evaluations using the CLIP space. To bolster our research, we introduce the CulText2I dataset, derived from six diverse TTI models and spanning ten languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T10:13:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.