Delineating Knowledge Boundaries for Honest Large Vision-Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26419v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:29:44 GMT
- Title: Delineating Knowledge Boundaries for Honest Large Vision-Language Models
- Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable multimodal performance yet remain prone to factual hallucinations.<n>We propose a systematic framework to enhance the refusal capability of VLMs when facing such unknown questions.
- Score: 28.13601862872343
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable multimodal performance yet remain prone to factual hallucinations, particularly in long-tail or specialized domains. Moreover, current models exhibit a weak capacity to refuse queries that exceed their parametric knowledge. In this paper, we propose a systematic framework to enhance the refusal capability of VLMs when facing such unknown questions. We first curate a model-specific "Visual-Idk" (Visual-I don't know) dataset, leveraging multi-sample consistency probing to distinguish between known and unknown facts. We then align the model using supervised fine-tuning followed by preference-aware optimization (e.g., DPO, ORPO) to effectively delineate its knowledge boundaries. Results on the Visual-Idk dataset show our method improves the Truthful Rate from 57.9\% to 67.3\%. Additionally, internal probing also demonstrates that the model genuinely recognizes its boundaries instead of just memorizing refusal patterns. Our framework further generalizes to out-of-distribution medical and perceptual domains, providing a robust path toward more trustworthy and prudent visual assistants.
Related papers
- Uncertainty-Aware Exploratory Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models [53.15468578562038]
We propose an Uncertainty-aware Exploratory Direct Preference Optimization (UE-DPO) method for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We first quantify the uncertainty from the model's failure to ground token predictions in the given image.<n>We then encourage more learning pressure on visually deficient tokens in preferred samples, and alleviate the over-penalization of beneficial knowledge in dispreferred samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T13:08:12Z) - POINTS-Seeker: Towards Training a Multimodal Agentic Search Model from Scratch [84.73366911912512]
We introduce Agentic Seeding, a dedicated phase designed to weave the precursors necessary for eliciting agentic behaviors.<n>We propose V-Fold, an adaptive history-aware compression scheme that preserves recent dialogue turns in high fidelity while folding historical context into the visual space via rendering.<n>We develop POINTS-Seeker-8B, a state-of-the-art multimodal agentic search model that consistently outperforms existing models across six diverse benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-15T16:09:37Z) - LVLM-Aided Alignment of Task-Specific Vision Models [49.96265491629163]
Small task-specific vision models are crucial in high-stakes domains.<n>We introduce a novel and efficient method for aligning small task-specific vision models with human domain knowledge.<n>Our method demonstrates substantial improvement in aligning model behavior with human specifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-26T11:11:25Z) - Graphing the Truth: Structured Visualizations for Automated Hallucination Detection in LLMs [0.0]
This paper introduces a framework that organizes proprietary knowledge and model-generated content into interactive visual knowledge graphs.<n>Users can diagnose inconsistencies, identify weak reasoning chains, and supply corrective feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T23:09:15Z) - Beyond Generation: Multi-Hop Reasoning for Factual Accuracy in Vision-Language Models [0.0]
Visual Language Models (VLMs) are powerful generative tools but often produce factually in- accurate outputs.<n>This work introduces a framework for knowledge-guided reasoning inVLMs, leverag- ing structured knowledge graphs for multi-hop verification.<n>We evaluate the framework using hi- erarchical, triple-based and bullet-point based knowledge representations, analyzing their ef-fectiveness in factual accuracy and logical infer- ence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-25T17:34:32Z) - Envisioning Beyond the Pixels: Benchmarking Reasoning-Informed Visual Editing [84.16442052968615]
We introduce RISEBench, the first benchmark for evaluating Reasoning-Informed viSual Editing (RISE)<n>RISEBench focuses on four key reasoning categories: Temporal, Causal, Spatial, and Logical Reasoning.<n>We conduct experiments evaluating nine prominent visual editing models, comprising both open-source and proprietary models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-03T17:59:56Z) - Transparent and Coherent Procedural Mistake Detection [30.540514590818265]
Procedural mistake detection (PMD) is a challenging problem of classifying whether a human user has successfully executed a task (specified by a procedural text)<n>We extend PMD to require generating visual self-dialog rationales to inform decisions.<n>Given the impressive, mature image understanding capabilities observed in recent vision-and-language models (VLMs), we curate a suitable benchmark dataset for PMD based on individual frames.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T16:13:55Z) - Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance.
Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z) - Bridging Generative and Discriminative Models for Unified Visual
Perception with Diffusion Priors [56.82596340418697]
We propose a simple yet effective framework comprising a pre-trained Stable Diffusion (SD) model containing rich generative priors, a unified head (U-head) capable of integrating hierarchical representations, and an adapted expert providing discriminative priors.
Comprehensive investigations unveil potential characteristics of Vermouth, such as varying granularity of perception concealed in latent variables at distinct time steps and various U-net stages.
The promising results demonstrate the potential of diffusion models as formidable learners, establishing their significance in furnishing informative and robust visual representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T10:36:57Z) - On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical
Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach.
We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset.
We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z) - Who Explains the Explanation? Quantitatively Assessing Feature
Attribution Methods [0.0]
We propose a novel evaluation metric -- the Focus -- designed to quantify the faithfulness of explanations.
We show the robustness of the metric through randomization experiments, and then use Focus to evaluate and compare three popular explainability techniques.
Our results find LRP and GradCAM to be consistent and reliable, while the latter remains most competitive even when applied to poorly performing models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-28T07:10:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.