Defeasible Conditional Obligation in a Two-tiered Preference-based Semantics (Extended Version)
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26977v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:04:26 GMT
- Title: Defeasible Conditional Obligation in a Two-tiered Preference-based Semantics (Extended Version)
- Abstract summary: The paper extends a Hansson-Lewis style preference semantics for dyadic deontic logic.<n>A nonmonotonic reasoning mechanism enables previously derived obligations to be withdrawn when new, potentially conflicting information comes in.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In response to a concern raised by Horty, this paper develops a two-tiered, preference-based semantic framework for modeling defeasible conditional obligations. The paper extends a Hansson-Lewis style preference semantics for dyadic deontic logic by incorporating a nonmonotonic reasoning mechanism that enables previously derived obligations to be withdrawn when new, potentially conflicting information comes in. The account is bi-preferential: two orderings--ideality and normality--on worlds are employed to address shortcomings in earlier approaches, with a separate ranking method for each. At the nonmonotonic layer, a number of postulates are considered, including antecedent strengthening, inclusion and no-drowning. A connection is established with so-called constrained input/output (I/O) logic--an existing standard for normative reasoning based on a different methodology.
Related papers
- A Minimal $κ$--$τ$ Logic for Risk-Sensitive Abduction [0.0]
This paper argues that in risk-sensitive domains, the timing of commitment is itself a governed decision.<n>We present a minimal $$--$$ logical framework built on two primitives.<n>The framework provides formal machinery for domains in which the distinction between highly likely and commit-worthy is operationally consequential.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-08T15:35:32Z) - Where Paths Split: Localized, Calibrated Control of Moral Reasoning in Large Language Models [15.280774412504101]
We present Convergent-Divergent Routing, which traces and edits minimal branch points inside transformer blocks.<n>Gating non-target branches at these loci blocks the downstream propagation while leaving upstream computations intact.<n>Experiments on real-life moral dilemmas show that our method reliably achieves preference preference largely preserves general capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T10:30:44Z) - MidSteer: Optimal Affine Framework for Steering Generative Models [53.89402578892719]
MidSteer is a more general affine framework for concept manipulation that relaxes assumptions and enables directed, minimal-disturbance transformations.<n>We demonstrate that MidSteer performs favorably across a range of tasks, modalities, and architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-17T19:23:33Z) - Technical Report -- A Context-Sensitive Multi-Level Similarity Framework for First-Order Logic Arguments: An Axiomatic Study [2.599882743586164]
Similarity in formal argumentation has recently gained attention due to its significance in problems such as argument aggregation in semantics and enthymeme decoding.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework for FOL argument similarity, built upon: (1) an extended axiomatic foundation; (2) a four-level parametric model covering predicates, literals, clauses, and formulae similarity; and (3) two model families, one syntax-sensitive via language models, both integrating contextual weights for nuanced and explainable similarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T10:05:03Z) - Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verification [49.506412445511934]
Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, yet their next-token prediction creates logical inconsistencies and reward hacking.<n>We introduce a formal logic verification-guided framework that dynamically interleaves formal symbolic verification with the natural language generation process.<n>We operationalize this framework via a novel two-stage training pipeline that synergizes formal logic verification-guided supervised fine-tuning and policy optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T07:01:25Z) - Rational Inference in Formal Concept Analysis [0.4499833362998487]
Defeasible conditionals are a form of non-monotonic inference.<n>KLM framework defines a semantics for the propositional case of defeasible conditionals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T20:15:20Z) - A Canonicalization Perspective on Invariant and Equivariant Learning [54.44572887716977]
We introduce a canonicalization perspective that provides an essential and complete view of the design of frames.
We show that there exists an inherent connection between frames and canonical forms.
We design novel frames for eigenvectors that are strictly superior to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T17:22:15Z) - A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended
Version) [72.77805489645604]
We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability.
Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity.
We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z) - On Regularization and Inference with Label Constraints [62.60903248392479]
We compare two strategies for encoding label constraints in a machine learning pipeline, regularization with constraints and constrained inference.
For regularization, we show that it narrows the generalization gap by precluding models that are inconsistent with the constraints.
For constrained inference, we show that it reduces the population risk by correcting a model's violation, and hence turns the violation into an advantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-08T03:39:22Z) - Logical Satisfiability of Counterfactuals for Faithful Explanations in
NLI [60.142926537264714]
We introduce the methodology of Faithfulness-through-Counterfactuals.
It generates a counterfactual hypothesis based on the logical predicates expressed in the explanation.
It then evaluates if the model's prediction on the counterfactual is consistent with that expressed logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-25T03:40:59Z) - Formal context reduction in deriving concept hierarchies from corpora
using adaptive evolutionary clustering algorithm star [15.154538450706474]
The process of deriving concept hierarchies from corpora is typically a time-consuming and resource-intensive process.
The resulting lattice of formal context is evaluated to the standard one using concept lattice-invariants.
The results show that adaptive ECA* performs concept lattice faster than other mentioned competitive techniques in different fill ratios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-10T07:18:03Z) - Reasoning about Typicality and Probabilities in Preferential Description
Logics [0.15749416770494704]
We describe preferential Description Logics of typicality, a nonmonotonic extension of standard Description Logics by means of a typicality operator T.
This extension is based on a minimal model semantics corresponding to a notion of rational closure.
We consider other strengthening of the rational closure semantics and construction to avoid the so-called blocking of property inheritance problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T14:50:31Z) - Modeling Contrary-to-Duty with CP-nets [19.561116525421316]
Conditional preference nets (CP-nets) are a compact formalism to express and analyse ceteris paribus preferences.
This paper shows how deontic concepts can be captured through conditional preference models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-23T18:23:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.